Connect with us

Calgary Flames

Tim Erixon and David Schlemko on Waivers – Free Defense?

Published

on

There’s no question that the Calgary Flames find themselves rather short on the blue line. The team was already slim before this season and the signing of Deryk Engelland has kind of flamed out (see what I did there?). He played 11 minutes on the second pairing last night and has been putting up rather poor performances over the course of the entire season. He’s due too much money over the course of the next three seasons, too. This is not good.

The other problem for the Flames is that there’s not exactly a litany of depth on the team or down on the farm. They have a 31-year-old journeyman on the roster in Corey Potter, a 21-year-old relative unknown quantity in Tyler Wotherspoon and from there maybe a 24-year-old journeyman in Mark Cundari. While they have a 65.1 percent chance to make the playoffs, they’re also in the beginning part of a rebuild and don’t want to send away future assets which makes acquiring players rather difficult. This is also not good.

If only there was some way to improve the defense while not having to give anything up. Fortunately there is! Two different okay defenders were placed on waivers today. Flames fans are familiar with the first one: Tim Erixon, a first round draft pick by the Flames in 2009 was waived by the Chicago Blackhawks today. The other, David Schlemko, was waived by the Dallas Stars.

How exactly would these defenders improve the team? At the very least, one would be replacing Deryk Engelland. Both individuals are left handed while Engelland plays on the right hand side of another right handed defender. Adding one of the two would put Diaz back to his normal side. The other would have to replace another left handed defenseman or just stay a scratch. Here's the W.O.W.Y. breakdown for the potentially displaced and incoming and some summaries.

Deryk Engelland

Goal Stats
Year Sample Minutes With Without Difference
GF GA GF% GF GA GF% GF GA GF%
12 4977.0 2.033 1.724 54.12% 2.400 2.041 54.05% -.367 -.317 .07%
13 2445.8 2.056 1.516 57.55% 2.146 1.622 56.96% -.091 -.105 .58%
14 3012.7 1.620 1.978 45.02% 1.809 1.766 50.59% -.189 .212 -5.57%
15 2967.8 1.047 2.051 33.79% 1.679 1.627 50.79% -.632 .424 -17.00%
Total 13403.3 1.726 1.816 48.74% 2.061 1.811 53.23% -.335 .005 -4.50%
Corsi Stats
Year Sample Minutes With Without Difference
CF CA CF% CF CA CF% CF CA CF%
12 4977.0 45.449 41.997 51.97% 48.465 39.362 55.18% -3.016 2.634 -3.21%
13 2445.8 41.451 45.317 47.77% 42.702 43.700 49.42% -1.251 1.617 -1.65%
14 3012.7 36.957 46.952 44.04% 40.693 42.691 48.80% -3.736 4.261 -4.76%
15 2967.8 34.052 47.300 41.86% 37.086 45.394 44.96% -3.034 1.906 -3.11%
Total 13403.3 40.287 44.891 47.30% 43.147 42.238 50.53% -2.860 2.653 -3.23%

Wow, those numbers are pretty bad. In 56 games this season, he has four points, zero goals, taken five more penalties than he's drawn and posted a Corsi of under 40 percent. He gets pretty easy zone starts too. Simply put he's awful. Just about the only positive thing anybody can say about Engelland is "Sometimes fights" and maybe "is big."

Tim Erixon

Goal Stats
Year Sample Minutes With Without Difference
GF GA GF% GF GA GF% GF GA GF%
12 963.0 1.848 2.285 44.72% 1.780 1.615 52.42% .069 .669 -7.70%
13 1977.5 2.104 1.669 55.76% 1.515 1.694 47.21% .589 -.025 8.55%
14 122.3 5.887 1.962 75.00% 1.731 1.692 50.57% 4.156 .270 24.43%
15 1503.3 1.809 1.929 48.40% 1.711 2.144 44.38% .098 -.215 4.02%
Total 4566.1 2.054 1.892 52.05% 1.641 1.826 47.34% .413 .067 4.72%
Corsi Stats
Year Sample Minutes With Without Difference
CF CA CF% CF CA CF% CF CA CF%
12 963.0 35.661 44.737 44.36% 39.049 43.526 47.29% -3.388 1.211 -2.93%
13 1977.5 37.583 41.497 47.53% 37.153 42.175 46.83% .430 -.678 .69%
14 122.3 46.934 50.532 48.15% 40.737 42.442 48.98% 6.197 8.090 -.82%
15 1503.3 48.612 44.900 51.98% 41.030 44.892 47.75% 7.582 .008 4.23%
Total 4566.1 41.059 43.543 48.53% 38.925 43.362 47.30% 2.134 .181 1.23%

Erixon's numbers are much better than Engelland's. He's still young at the age of 24, he has some size at 191 CM and 91 KG. Sure the sample size is smaller, but he's had a better effect on the team. The only down side is he doesn't score as much – he has one point in 27 games. Oh and Burke, he's American.

David Schlemko

Goal Stats
Year Sample Minutes With Without Difference
GF GA GF% GF GA GF% GF GA GF%
12 3236.5 2.113 1.922 52.37% 1.838 1.604 53.40% .276 .318 -1.03%
13 1831.0 2.294 1.202 65.63% 1.724 1.840 48.38% .569 -.638 17.25%
14 2896.3 1.899 1.602 54.24% 1.623 1.751 48.12% .276 -.149 6.13%
15 1662.5 1.768 2.406 42.36% 1.463 2.232 39.59% .306 .174 2.78%
Total 9626.3 2.024 1.772 53.31% 1.687 1.801 48.36% .337 -.029 4.95%
Corsi Stats
Year Sample Minutes With Without Difference
CF CA CF% CF CA CF% CF CA CF%
12 3236.5 45.005 48.873 47.94% 44.583 44.886 49.83% .422 3.988 -1.89%
13 1831.0 45.187 46.859 49.09% 46.389 44.484 51.05% -1.202 2.374 -1.96%
14 2896.3 49.008 42.668 53.46% 43.832 43.873 49.98% 5.175 -1.205 3.48%
15 1662.5 45.355 49.998 47.56% 43.721 45.679 48.91% 1.634 4.320 -1.34%
Total 9626.3 46.304 46.818 49.72% 44.552 44.642 49.95% 1.753 2.176 -.23%

Schlemko is basically a break even guy in possession, but carries some positive score effects. He's a bit older at 27 and his numbers aren't as good as Erixon's, but they're far greater than Engelland's. He's certainly worth a claim for a guy team with no depth. Claiming him would also cut into Dallas's depth as they're chasing the Flames in the standings.

So yeah, the Flames should definitely be considering a claim or two. They have a fantastic opportunity to improve upon a blue line that desperately needs improvement without having to give up any rebuilding assets. They seem like no brain moves. Let's see how intelligent the front office is.

by Les Mavus