Game 26 Recap: Canucks usual on Flames
As per the game preview, as the Flames are to the Oilers, the Canucks are to Calgary. Simply have had their number for a good stretch of time now. A win was not the betting man's expectation.
It was the typical affair reduced to a goon show in the third with another unnecessary run at a Goalie. Props to Matt Stajan for showing some fire and going into battle. Guy is not a fighter but he gave it the old college try. Jackman and Kosto - where were you?
Long gone are the days of Trevor Linden's Vancouver Canucks who played with respect for the game.
This is the team the rest of the league despises and they showed us why again. Despite their high level of skill, they have no on-ice respect or class in their game. No player leadership to call their team to account.
Exhibit A: Karlsson takes an injury in the third and with the game essentially over at 5-1, Kipper comes in to mop up and close it out. What do the Canucks via David Booth do immediately on the next shift? Take a run directly at Kipper. In the recent wake of runs at Goalies what does this say? Why do such a thing in a game when you already have the Win in the bag?
Total douche move and the crowd at Rogers does the wave in the background. Need I say more.
They are a squad devoid of character leadership. There is no Linden or Iginla like leader to take Booth to the side and say "Hey, that isn't necessary." The silent sheltered Sedins shrug it off and assume that is hockey in the NHL or Kesler who probably giggles with Booth afterward and says next time you get the concussion on Kipper. "Hee hee hee".
They will dive for a win. They will cheap-shot for a win. They will bite for a win. They will run your goalie when they are up 4 goals. They are the Canucks. They will trample all the unwritten rules of the game in their pursuit of a win and they think they are a better team because of it.
They aren't, they are simply a team that despite unquestionable skill, no one respects.
The game started off very good for the Flames with a strong first period. A 5 on 3 PP for the Canucks was killed by the Flames and a Alex Tanguay bank shot off Roberto Luongo had the Flames up by one. It was a solid frame for the good guys.
The second period was a significantly weaker effort. A borderline call on Jarome Iginla for goaltender interference resulted in a PP goal for the Canucks by Kevin Bieksa. Late in the second Chris Higgins threw another one in, late in the frame and the Flames were down 2-1 leaving the 2nd period.
In the third the wheels came off the cart. I would sum it up that young Henrik Karlsson simply was not focused or ready when the puck dropped in the third period. David Booth got his first goal of the game to go with his previous 2 assists 40 seconds in, on a very stoppable wrap around.
Little over a minute later another stoppable shot got by Jannik Hansen, deflection or not, got by him and we can see that the area that young Karlsson needs to focus on is between the ears. Focus and fortitude to weather and shrug off bad goals is what this young man needs to get a handle on, if he is looking for an NHL career.
The final goal on him was some Sedin stuff we have seen before on a PP. No fault of his just the usual Sedin stuff. Tight angle shot that Daniel Sedin found the breadbasket on.
Here are the highlights
Karlsson left the game injured and we can speculate that Leland Irving may be called up. This is potentially a good thing as more and more Flames rookies are seeing NHL ice. How Irving does may be worth a gander and this may be a good season to do so.
The other possibility is that Karlsson is not injured and may have wanted to just get the hell out of the game. If that is the case it is not a good sign. The between the ears stuff is critical for NHL goalies. Karlsson only needs to look to the end of the ice to see a Goalie famous for butter between the ears despite his skill.
You have to be able to stay focused despite bad goals and weather rough loud ugly crowds if you want to play NHL hockey.
Matt Stajan gets my 'A' for effort award. He was hustling and props for him for seriously stepping out of his role and fighting Maxim Lapierre in the third. Kipper had just been run over and somebody had to do something. Nod to Stajan for his heart, guy takes non-stop flak for his contract but at least he stood up for his Goalie tonight.
Brent Sutter's take on the game, just in case you think I am overblowing the run on Kipper, he mentions it as well.
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Brendan Morrison?
Trade him, waive him, do something with him.
For all of Stajan’s hussle he can’t win a faceoff for the life of him and is always a minus player.
Is this it? Has Calgary Flames fallen so low that Match Sticks and Gasoline attack another teams character in order to feel better? Honestly, one day the Canucks aren’t tough enough, the next day they’re dirty head hunters.
Booth is not the sort of player. He tried to cut in front of the net and got road into Kiprusoff by the Flames defense men. Consider that that the Flames injured their own goaltender in another in moment of carelessness a moment earlier.
Wait- are you honestly trying to justify what Booth did? I like Booth as a player, and I think that was a dirty/unnecessary play. The fact is he made no attempt to score and only attempted to level Kipper. Grow up.
reading that really made my brain hurt
by Justin Azevedo on Dec 5, 2011 10:53 AM PST up reply actions
I don't know if he was justifying
but the guy cut to the net, and with the defenseman on him, the only option he had is to stop.
It was probably unneeded, I get where that can be seen that way, but that is not something that has been part of Booth’s game. He does go to the net a lot though. I would hesitate to call it “dirty” though. Tootoo left the puck and jumped into Miller with a forearm shiver to the head. Booth just kept going and clattered into the goalie. The former was dirty, the latter was more hard play, I thought.
I did read that some were trying to blame Hodgson for the Karlsson injury ( I think he was just injured, not wanting to get out), when it sure looked like Kostopolous lost an edge and clattered into him. Hope the kid is OK.
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Ghandi. I think he was a Canucks fan...
@Vancitydan Writer at Nucks Misconduct
Really?
"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"
I didn't like the play either, but come on man.
Booth had the puck on his stick. That’s the difference between he and Tootoo for me. It was dumb, no question, but this is being blown WAY out of proportion. It was a run on the goalie (never been done by any team by the Canucks, obviously), and the Flames responded as they should have.
To take that play as an indictment of the Sedins’ leadership or lack thereof, however, is ridiculous. Unless you have first hand knowledge of Sedins/Kesler encouraging goalie-running or “giggling away”, as you put it, I don’t see how the twins or Kesler have anything to do with this play at all.
I’m not necessarily agreeing with that idea- just the fact that it was a dangerous unnecessary play. Leadership is 90% bullshit anyways, if you’ve ever read anything I’ve ever written here.
Fair enough, and I haven’t really read anything you’ve written, was just responding to what I saw above.
I agree it was dangerous; my point of view, however, is that it was a drive to the net and an unintentional collision. Obviously I’m going to give Booth the benefit of the doubt; he plays for my team and he’s never had a history of being a dirty player (same reason I’m not going to give Tootoo the benefit of the doubt, same reason I wouldn’t really give Burrows or Lap the benefit of the doubt).
Well done sir, I had a good laugh at this. Also, it proves that it is possible to make fun of the false narrative about the rivalry (and our team’s crap play) without calling one of our fans an idiot. I look forward to the day when things balance out and we start to see some closer matches between our teams.
In the meantime, I shall pay tribute and kiss the Sedins’ Stanley Cup rings. :)
Hockey fan guaranteed comments:
Flames fan: We won a cup once 20-some years ago…we’ll always be better for that!
Leafs fan: So, we’re the best, we won a bunch twice as long ago.
Hawks fan: Losers! We won one two years ago. I know cuz that’s when I started watching.
Wings fan: Why does everyone hate us?
Canucks fan: f#@k it, let’s break something.
Habs fan: Sacre Le Bleu! Les Bruins est le goons!
Oilers fan: RYAN NUGENT HOPKINS!!!!!!!!! also gretzky, but RYAN NUGENT HOPKINS!!!!!
Coyotes fan: Wait…we have a hockey team?
"Planet Earth is blue, and there's nothing I can do."
Dropping F-bombs since the early 70's.
'Nucks Misconduct Sr. VP of Inappropriateness and Questionable Conduct, second director of immaturity. @Twitchy67
by Twitchy2010 on Dec 5, 2011 4:19 PM PST up reply actions 3 recs

























