Why are the Flames sending Backlund to Abbotsford?
Today the Flames announced that they'll be sending Mikael Backlund down from the big club to Abbotsford of the AHL. Backlund has been a healthy scratch since December 18th.
With 4 goals and 4 assists in 32 games, Backlund hasn't exactly been lighting up the traditional NHL stat line, but has been +4 on the season. Obviously Brent Sutter and interim GM Jay Feaster felt he wasn't bringing enough to the Flames squad and are backed up in that assertion by the Flames recent winning streak with Backlund in street clothes.
But as we all know here at M&G, the traditional stat line doesn't tell the whole story. In fact, the Flames appear to be making a huge mistake by sending Backlund down to the Heat. Not only are they wasting a year of his entry level contract, but he's actually holding his own as a third line player at an age when NHL forwards typically develop the fastest. Denying him time in the NHL is likely hurting his development.
More after the jump.....
Backlund has played 55 games with the Flames over the past two seasons and has been a solid possession player facing 3rd line competition.
Click on the table if you'd like to see it in larger form. Info is from BehindtheNet.ca
Although he is facing relatively weak competition and definitely getting the easiest zone starts of any center on the Flames roster, Backlund is outplaying his competition. His Corsi rate is fantastic, and his scoring differential shows that the results are following the dominance in possession. His Relative +/- was the best among Flames centers last year and 2nd best this season.
While Backlund seems to have regressed in his scoring rate, that can at least be partially explained by a PDO drop of 39 points from last season. He got a few lucky bounces last year and has had poor puck luck this season.
There has been some discussion on the topic that Backlund may be carried by his linemates. Here are Backlund's top winger combinations so far this year according to DobberHockey.com
- Glencross & Morrison
- Bourque & Hagman
- Hagman & Moss
- Bourque & Glencross
- Glencross & Jackman
While all six of those players are solid possession-wise and conscious defenders, none aside from Bourque would be considered a top 6 offensive player on most teams in the NHL.
Backland's Corsi is better than any of his linemates but his points are lower by 0.2-0.5 per 60 minutes. Regardless, it's not like he's been paired with a couple superstars and is riding their coat tails.
Critics could point to the fact that the team is forced to shield Backlund by giving him the easier matchups and cushy zone starts. This makes sense as it could force coach Sutter to feed other lines into situations that are less than advantageous. That said, if the Flames are forced into sheltering a rookie's minutes, at least they know he is consistently outplaying his matchups. Over time he will need to graduate to more difficult minutes, but he hasn't even played a full NHL season yet. Most players start to take on tough minutes as their careers progress, not immediately.
The typical high draft pick usually needs to spend a few years in the AHL, over in a European league or some other development experience between the time they're drafted and when they crack an NHL squad. Very few make the leap at the age of 18. But eventually, they need the challenge and the experience at the big club to put the finishing touches on their development. Backlund is holding his own and needs time against the best in the world if he's to continue developing. At the age of 21, it's time to give him a prolonged shot at being a regular NHL player.
If the Flames can't manage one rookie forward on their roster, there isn't much hope that trading some of their established veterans for prospects would be a viable strategy for rebuilding an aging squad.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Jay Feaster, in his interview with CBC’s “After Hours” last night suggested that the Abbotsford trip was more of a conditioning stint as it would allow Backland to get a few games in (they play four games this week), he’d never be more than an hour flight to either Calgary or Vancouver if they wanted to call him back up, and that he’d likely be back with the team before the January 11th road trip.
True, but he’s probably just going to sit in the pressbox again when he is called back up. Ryans just showing that this stint isn’t needed because he should be playing in the ’chell over a guy like Kotalik or Kostopolous.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Jan 2, 2011 4:47 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Yeah, I heard the same stuff about conditioning but it’s not like he isn’t practicing with the Flames. Put the damn kid in the game. We may be on a nice little run right now but the real goal with Backlund is to turn him into a regular NHLer and he isn’t going to learn that in Abby. He’s badly outplaying his matchups Corsi-wise and he’s only 55 games in to his NHL career.
Ryan
Matchsticks & Gasoline, Sports Opinionated, Pink Shirt Wise Guys: Italian Soccer Podcast & occasionally even Hockey Prospectus. Apparently I have commitment problems.
One of the Flames problems under Sutter was just this – their indifference to developing guys at this level (with possible one notable exception – Phaneuf). Every other young-ish player got the tentative “play till we lose or you screw up” option. And when kids are in the line-up, they play as bottom six players and never get PP time.
Now, to be fair, it’s not like the club had a lot of viable guys anyways. But at some point you have to give the home-grown players the at-bats to improve. Especially when they’re keeping their above water like Backlund has been.
phaneuf and pardy. that’s what you meant, right ?
by walkinvisible on Jan 2, 2011 9:39 PM PST up reply actions
This seems fairly obvious to me. Backlund is a rookie, the only rookie save the goalie, on a team full of veterans with contracts, on a team which, for whatever reason, is desperately trying to maintain the illusion, both for the fans and for themselves, that the playoffs are a real possibility.
Brents just being, polite, but that isnt quite the right word, to the veterans on the team. I don’t know why he is doing that, because he doesn’t owe them anything, but that seems to be why guys like Kotalik are in instead of #11.
This club has made decisions all season that aren’t based on whats best hockey wise, this is just another example.
i think this was darryl’s influence up until recently, and i wouldn’t be surprised to see some changes upcoming.
by walkinvisible on Jan 3, 2011 9:21 PM PST up reply actions
The argument has been made that the AHL might help simply because Backlund would be playing up to twice the minutes there. I personally would prefer he either be in a top 6 role with Tanguay/Iginla or on a 3rd line with decent linemates (and some god damned PP time), but at least AHL is better than pressbox/4th line.
Backlund is playing 11+ minutes of ES time right now. If he was given a bit of PP time, that’s plenty. At most in the AHL he’s going to get 15 min ES and that’s pushing it. That said, it’s against much worse competition. I just don’t see the benefit when he’s already holding his own against better players than reside in the AHL.
Ryan
Matchsticks & Gasoline, Sports Opinionated, Pink Shirt Wise Guys: Italian Soccer Podcast & occasionally even Hockey Prospectus. Apparently I have commitment problems.
Ryan, I’d like to argue that you’re undervalueing the AHL. Sure, he won’t be playing against the Sedins and Crosbys of the world, but the AHL is pretty solid defensively. And that might just be what Mickis needs for a few games.
Take Josh Bailey of the Isles for example. Gets injured about a month in the season, comes back, isn’t the same. Eventually gets sent down to Bridgeport for 11 games, comes back and starts playing 19 minutes a game (average of 18:58 specifically) while getting more consistent shots on goal and just skating better in general.
My thoughts are Feaster/Sutter want Mickis to get some good ice time again before throwing him out against NHL level competition after sitting for five games.
Of course I expect to get lambasted by half the readers for even suggesting that Backlund should spend just a few games in Abby, but still, if the front office is all but saying Mickis won’t be there long, not a big deal.
Josh Bailey might not be the right example because Backlund could easily get 18 minutes a game on the Isles. That said, I see your point. The AHL for a few games is fine. And the AHL for developing players in their leap from junior to NHL serves an extremely valuable purpose. It’s just that once a player can play with the big boys, it’s time to let him do it. Backlund is outplaying the bottom 50% of the NHL right now with some easy zone starts. His game definitely needs refinement and progress – but he will only get that refinement in the NHL.
If the trip to Abby is only 5 games that’s one thing. If he’s going to stay down there or come back to the Flames and sit in the press box, then the Flames still don’t understand what to do with young players.
Ryan
Matchsticks & Gasoline, Sports Opinionated, Pink Shirt Wise Guys: Italian Soccer Podcast & occasionally even Hockey Prospectus. Apparently I have commitment problems.
Right now, (as I mention in my most recent Feaster piece) I’m trying to believe in the best until given a reason to the contrary. And yes, you’re right about Bailey and the quality of the Isles, the real point was that it’s not uncommon to send them down for a quick “confidence booster”. And hopefully that’s all this is.






















