SBN's Mock NHL Expansion Draft--Which Flames Would You Protect?
With the dearth of NHL news in the weeks leading up to training camp, SB Nation's hockey division has decided to run a little experiment in the form of a mock NHL expansion draft. Leading up to this exercise, two new locations were chosen (Winnipeg and Quebec city) along with names for the new franchises (the Jets and Nordiques)--you can all stop holding your collective breath now. Former SBNer James Mirtle will act as the GM of the faux Nordiques while Behind The Net's Gabriel Desjardins will oversee hockey operations for the Jets. The actual draft goes down later this week, but first, the matter of which players each team wishes to protect from being pilfered by the new franchises must be settled. Here are the rules, as per On The Forecheck, after the jump:
Ground rules on protected lists:
- Teams can protect either "1 goalie, 5 defensemen and 9 forwards" OR "2 goalies, 3 defensemen and 7 forwards."
- If you go the two goalie route, at least one goalie left unprotected must have played in at least 10 games last season OR 25 games in the last two seasons combined. One game = at least 31 minutes.
- Each team must leave unprotected at least one defenseman who appeared in 40 games last season OR 70 games in the last two seasons combined.
- Each team must leave unprotected at least two forwards who appeared in 40 games last season OR 70 games in the last two seasons combined.
- Players who have played in 49 or fewer games are automatically exempt and do not need to be protected.
All Flames goalies outside of Mikka Kiprusoff are exempt on the basis of not having played enough games at the NHL level, so we can safely select the "one goalie" option at the top of the list. Mikael Backlund, Ryan Stone, and Brett Sutter, along with several other prospects whom have appeared in fewer than 49 games with the Flames would also be exempt from the draft. The following Flames defencemen would hypothetically qualify for exposure in an expansion draft, according to the rules listed above:
I think most people's lists will look nearly identical here; right off the bat, my five protected defencemen would be Bouwmeester, Regehr, White, Giordano, and then probably Pardy. I have zero issues with jettisoning any of the remaining three (Staios, Sarich, Kronwall) Eastward; let's take a look at the forwards:
Again, the selection of the nine protected forwards will likely be fairly unanimous; I'll go with Iginla, Bourque, Tanguay, Glencross, Langkow, Moss, Stajan, Hagman, and Jokinen. I pondered protecting Conroy, but at his age, the likelihood that either hypothetical team would snap him up is debatable; Jokinen and Stajan are younger, and are probably better bets to score goals and provide offence--even if they can't handle tough minutes--which is what Langkow is there for. My list also leaves Kotalik, Ivanans, and Jackman exposed--but the issue with Kotalik being on the list is that he has a limited NTC.
Each team's list of protected and unprotected players is due by Thursday, so I'd love to get everyone's opinion on the subject before then. Who makes your list?
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You have it right, Hayley. I’m an admirer of long standing when we discuss Craig Conroy, but he’d almost certainly retire if he were selected, and would likely advise teams of that fact. The rest of the selections make themselves due to ability or contractual reasons (Pardy over Sarich). If Kotalik can’t be exposed, you’re likely stuck with having Moss on the list. The Flames wouldn’t be hurt a lick by this sort of draft, IMO. Every worthwhile player could be protected.
Easy
You nailed it for me.
As to the NTC for Kotalik – you’d think if the league was creating new jobs for the players through expansion these would be universally waived for the expansion draft only.
Thumbs up.
Put that list in. Kotalik and Sarich would likely be the two that get taken.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Aug 31, 2010 10:10 PM PDT reply actions
Is it Xmas?
The thought of making Staios and Kotalik available for other teams to just take seems like a great dream. I like the list you have Hayley, my preference would be to keep Pardy, purely because it is the more cap-friendly option and the Flames could use all the help they can get cap-wise.
Ryan
Matchsticks & Gasoline, Sports Opinionated, Front Office Fans, Pink Shirt Wise Guys: Italian Soccer Podcast & occasionally even Puck Prospectus. Yes, I'm a sports-writing whore...don't hate me.
It doesn’t mean they would be taken either. If this was a true expansion draft – it probably would have been done much earlier – and given the teams also the opportunity to stock through free agency; so they might not pick from the available lists if they thought they could do better on the FA market. Even now there are probably guys of much better value than Staios that you could get for a million.
Agreed that the only decision for us is Pardy vs. Sarich, and frankly, I’d expose Pardy. Sarich has some trade value, where Pardy doesn’t. Sarich is also a veteran who can play tough minutes if needed. Pardy could be replaced with any of Kronwall, Pelech or Negrin without missing a beat.
You might only get a mid round draft pick for Sarich, but that is worth more to me than losing him for nothing.
Coronas & Iginlas Reporting!
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Sep 5, 2010 8:58 PM PDT up reply actions

by 



























