Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Madonna Promises No Wardrobe Malfunctions

Flames Sign Conroy To One-Year, Two-Way Deal

The Flames announced the signing of soon-to-be thirty-nine year old centre Craig Conroy to a one-year deal today. The terms were not disclosed by the club, but the deal is allegedly a two-way contract at league minimum, as per the Herald's Vicki Hall. With the health of Daymond Langkow still in question and the ability of any of the other three centres currently on the roster to handle tough minutes at even strength on the penalty kill, retaining Conroy certainly makes sense for the Flames, especially at that dollar figure with a versatile contract.

I'm not sure whether or not Conroy makes the team is really a question, I think there's too much respect there; perhaps he'll retire if he gets demoted, because I can't imagine a thirty-nine year old player with a family wants to spend what is potentially his last season traipsing around the AHL, but who knows, he could prove to be a useful influence on what looks to be a very young Abbotsford team. What say you?

Poll
Re-Signing Conroy is...
A good move--he still has value to the team
150 votes
A bad move--he's over the hill
42 votes

192 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 22 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

For as much as Sutter is disliked around these parts, Craig Conroy is the #1 example of why I’m still a fan of Darryl. Back when we eliminated Detroit in the 04 playoffs, CBC interviewed Conroy right after and he said that he at first considered being traded to Calgary a low point in his career. By that series, he said it was one of the best things to happen to him. He’s also suggested regrets at leaving Calgary for LA to chase the money. Conroy’s attitude towards the Flames mirrors the massive growth in reputation this team has enjoyed under Sutter and King. And that reputation is only enhanced today. People around the league know how close Conroy is to his silver stick, and for the Flames to give a guy who has been a warrior for us for nearly a decade the chance to earn it will be noted.

I think he definitely gets his nine games in. After that, it becomes interesting. Signing a two-way deal indicates to me that he is willing to go to Abbotsford if one of the kids beats him out. Conroy in a teaching role down in the sticks, with a likely call up for a playoff run would be great for the development system.

by Resolute on Aug 11, 2010 4:14 PM PDT reply actions  

I think he’s in town for the duration if he breaks camp with the big club, Res. The Flames had a full roster before Conroy’s deal, and with the news that Kronwall wants to head home, adding Conroy would leave the team with the standard 14F 7D 2G arrangement. He’s still a pretty worthwhile NHLer in that 10th to 14th F spot on the roster, and with Langkow’s uncertain future, he’s nice insurance. I don’t doubt he’d be terrific as a coach-on-the-ice type in Abby, but I think he’s still got enough tread on his tire to play in a sensible bottom six role for one more year. At any rate, good signing no matter how it shakes out.

by Robert Cleave on Aug 11, 2010 4:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

I expect you are right, but if age does catch up, and someone like Brett Sutter shows he can do a better job… Ultimately, it will come down to penalty killing. If Conroy is still effective, he’s not going anywhere. That really is the role he is here for at this point.

by Resolute on Aug 11, 2010 5:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Cap limit-trade coming?

Conroy will be valuable, he is better than most goon types and actually can win faceoffs when shorthanded and play the penalty killer roll perfectly. i just have to wonder what the Flames are going to do to meet the cap-a trade must be coming, or Kotalik, Staois, or Sarich must be on the move. Maybe a top four defenceman is going to allow the cap to be met. A first round pick and at least one prospect for any top tier veterans would be beneficial. My confidence in the player(s) for player(s) trades by Sutter and company is waning. I think a multiplayer deal might spice things up, not sure if Calgary is headed for a Cup soon, therefore, some horse-trading would be entertaining. Chicago has proven that young prospects developed quickly can win a cup, even with a shaky goaltending stable.
Chicago dumped so many players it kind of symbolizes a fundamental change in NHL roster maneuvering, gone are the days of slowly developing players-speed, youth, and quick development are necessary. Players then demand big money and they have to be dealt for more prospects and drafts to keep yourself under the cap. Calgary, unfortunately is trying to buck this trend. I’m not a GM but I see the economic reality of the cap.

by budgie d on Aug 11, 2010 7:03 PM PDT reply actions  

It’s a good possibility that our best centre on opening night is making 500k.

I’m not just talking “best” as in “oh how cute! a complete player! that means he can play defense!” but as in “hey look he can actually outplay his opponents”.

It’d be funny if it wasn’t so damn sad.

Also: what’s with all the rebuild junkies? Did we forget how terrible losing hockey is to watch?

by R O on Aug 11, 2010 8:38 PM PDT reply actions  

Confirmation bias. People look at the sexy example of the Penguins, Hawks and Capitals. They choose to ignore the Oilers, Panthers, Blue Jackets, Thrashers, Islanders, Wild, etc.

by Resolute on Aug 11, 2010 9:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

TRADE IGINALAA WE NEEDZ PROSPECTT

The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go

by Justin Azevedo on Aug 12, 2010 12:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

Rebuilders anonymous

I hadn’t even waded in here yet and you guys are already shouting me down !!

Darryl has chosen his direction for this year. I give him until the All Start Break to see if this group can contend. The only move he (might) need to make now is a salary cap move as discussed; the return will be negligible. As I said somewhere else, return on veterans will be inflated at deadline time.

Res- losing hockey is terrible to watch – but it is far worse to watch when the average age of the team is 30, than when the average age is 24. Hope is the fuel that feeds the flames of a fans passion.

by PrairieStew on Aug 13, 2010 7:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

No rebuilding, just re-stocking

A complete rebuilding purge isn’t needed. The farm does need a few top prospects though. It would be nice to see Backlund actually beat out Conroy, not just be handed his job. The same goes for defensive depth or a scoring winger that could have made the Tanguay signing a luxury rather than a stark need. If the Flames had players coming through the ranks, they could be pickier in free agency.

By the way, I have yet to see a logical defense for the Jackman and Ivanans signings while buying out Dawes. Those 3 moves scare the *@#$ out of me when I try to have faith in the front office.

Ryan

Matchsticks & Gasoline, Sports Opinionated, Front Office Fans, Pink Shirt Wise Guys: Italian Soccer Podcast & occasionally even Puck Prospectus. Yes, I'm a sports-writing whore...don't hate me.

by SO_RyanP on Aug 15, 2010 7:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

The lowest I see Backs going is 3rd line, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he ends up on the 2nd (or 1st, if BSutt ever lets the Tang/Joker/Iggy combo break up). I think the kid’s one potential achilles heel is confidence, but if he gets his head straight and keeps it that way, he can rise quickly.

by SmellOfVictory on Aug 16, 2010 10:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Oilers are a team I’d leave out of that. They’ve only been in ‘rebuild’ mode for what, three seasons? And either next season or the following one, they’re going to be a damn fun team to watch. It’s clear that going for a rebuild is a risky move oft times, but at the same time it’s not the complete shitshow that a lot of people think of it. And although I don’t want the Flames to do that (don’t think it’s necessary, really), if my team is hypothetically rebuilding and losing a bunch of games, it’s relatively easy for me to enjoy if there are a couple of exciting youngsters that I get to watch develop into stars (ie thinking of watching Edmonton next season).

by SmellOfVictory on Aug 16, 2010 10:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nope, the Oilers definitely fit the pattern. Most “rebuilds” are forced on teams as the result of either gross incompetence or an utter lack of money. The Oilers today are basically where the Blackhawks were five years ago: Managed by morons who couldn’t find their own ass with both hands and a map. They certainly have spent a lot more money to suck than teams in similar position, but they are still in the same boat: many years of losing, many years of high draft picks. To date, many of their “can’t miss” prospects have been utter busts.

We’ll see if Eberle, Hall and MPS can be something more than the next Schremp, Cogliano and Nilsson. I expect they will be, but I don’t expect Bambi and Lowe to build anything of value around them.

by Resolute on Aug 17, 2010 8:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Langkow is vital, and I hope Backlund or Stagan step up

Good point, Conroy could be the best two-way centre if Langkow isn’t healthy. A total rebuild isn’t necessary and agreed its brutal for fans. Financially Calgary is over the cap with depth at defence. Calgary needs to unload a couple of salaries and restock the draft picks. The Jolkinen deal with Phoenix cost plenty and no drafts from the Phaneuf deal. Its nice to get veteran players in trades but they all end up being RFAs or UFAs and gone in a year or two. I’m not sure what the perfect mix is, but I am quite certain a couple of prospects have to be mixed in the roster to meet the salary cap. Its not rebuilding, its having a balance of a few top salaries-superstars(?) a bulk of highly paid-2-4 mill, and a few younger break in players at 500,00.
Remember when Calgary had injury problems last year, they couldn’t ice a full roster due to cap restrictions. Its better to have a couple of prospects in the roster. A total rebuild doesn’t work anymore, your players will eventually put you well over the cap if your rebuild is successful. Its a catch 22-good point about all round players RO.

by budgie d on Aug 11, 2010 9:37 PM PDT reply actions  

34 and 39

The age of the best 2 centres. 6 and 11 years past the peak for most hockey players. The younger of which is injured and could be out for a long time.

Backlund, Stajan, White and Bouw need to be 100% better than they were last year just to staunch the bleeding.

by PrairieStew on Aug 13, 2010 7:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Meh.

Hey look, that dog has a poofy tail! Teeheehee, here poof!

DARRYL: DO SOMETHING USEFUL!!!!

by TheBurnward on Aug 12, 2010 12:04 AM PDT reply actions  

Signing Conroy is a good move, but then let me ask… Why did we get Tim Jackman and Raitis Ivanans again? I do hope they are some kind of trading bait to get us under the CAP and get ‘something’ back. And of course, we have our beloved Kotalik and Staois which i am sure our team can do without as well. I do hope Darryl do somethin’, something useful.

by Outz on Aug 12, 2010 6:42 AM PDT reply actions  

Why did we get Tim Jackman and Raitis Ivanans again?

Indeed. Stone-Conroy-Dawes would have been a killer fourth line.

by R O on Aug 12, 2010 7:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

agree. nobody knows if Conroy might still have the legs or can still contribute as play maker as we know he can, but I am really puzzle by Jackman and Ivanans…

by Outz on Aug 12, 2010 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

You can ask

But you won’t find an answer here.

by PrairieStew on Aug 13, 2010 7:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

Conroy with Richard Park on the Right Wing, and Glencross on the left… is a nice fourth line… If you move some salaries… I also like Glencross-Conroy-Moss as a fourth line. They played well together as a third line last in the past…

by Everton Fan on Aug 12, 2010 11:42 AM PDT reply actions  

2004 Roster-versus 2010 Roster

Player by Player I think we might be ahead of 2004, the year of the Cup Finalist Team
Small tweaking needed but it looks pretty competitive
    
        2004 2010
34 Miikka Kiprusoff G Kiprusoff, Miikka
1 Roman Turek G Karlsson, Henrik

2 Mike Commodore D Giordano, Mark
21 Andrew Ference D Pardy, Adam
3 Denis Gauthier D Sarich, Cory
4 Jordan Leopold D Pelech Matt
32 Toni Lydman D Bouwmeester, Jay
5 Steve Montador D White, Ian D
28 Robyn Regehr D Regehr, Robyn
44 Rhett Warrener D Kronwall, Staffan D

Martin Gelinas LW Hagman, Niklas
 Oleg Saprykin LW Tanguay, Alex
 Ville Nieminen LW Glencross, Curtis
 Marcus Nilson LW Sutter, Brett
 Chris Simon LW Ivanans, Raitis
 
 Craig Conroy C Conroy, Craig
 Matthew Lombardi C Jokinen, Olli
 Dean McAmmond C Langkow, Daymond
Steve Reinprecht C Backlund, Mikael
Stephane Yelle C Stajan, Matt

 Chris Clark RW Bourque, Rene
 Shean Donovan RW Jackman, Tim
 Jarome Iginla RW Iginla, Jarome
 Chuck Kobasew RW Moss, David

by budgie d on Aug 13, 2010 3:31 PM PDT reply actions  

except

Your best players in 2004 are still your best players in 2010 and they are over 30. 2004 Iggy is not 2010 Iggy, or Conroy or Regehr. Kipper might perform close to 2004 level ( 1.69 GAA ??) , but the rest need to be significantly better for it to be close.

by PrairieStew on Aug 16, 2010 7:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Calgary Flames.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Funny-pictures-chippy-the-attack-gopher-1hv_small
20 wins required
Necks_small
Dave Shoalts says ridiculous stuff about goaltending
Needles_small
New Team, for me anyway...
Necks_small
Are the Flames the team where Shooting Percentage comes to die?
Lax-xl_small
Flames and Roughnecks
Funny-pictures-chippy-the-attack-gopher-1hv_small
Defensive imbalance

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 51 31 15 5 67
Minnesota 51 25 19 7 57
Calgary 52 24 22 6 54
Colorado 53 26 25 2 54
Edmonton 51 20 26 5 45

(updated 2.4.2012 at 12:36 AM PST)

24 - 22 - 6

Won 1


Certified Executives of the Office of Management

52987_1302804284_tb_small ArikJames

Photo_71_small Hayley

Officiants of the Bureau of Editing

Ryan_small SO_RyanP

Dsc03339_small Mitch Smith

Bureaucrats

E571c235251f6540d35494b73d613163_small Justin Azevedo

Luongo_small DownGoesLuongo

Redfordnewmanbutchcassidy19_small Scott Lepp

Mcinnismonday_small BookoflooB