Tuesday Afternoon Tidbits: Kotalik Clears Waivers, Flames Ink Karlsson
After being placed on waivers by the Flames yesterday, Ales Kotalik cleared without being claimed by another NHL team, and a decision on his future is expected by tomorrow--the NHL buyout deadline. According to several members of the hockey media, however, the Flames have no intentions of buying out the remainder of Kotalik's contract, and have yet to subject the Czech forward to unconditional waivers--an apparent pre-requisite for any potential buyout:
As per Sportsnet's John Shannon's Twitter:
To be clear, It is not the Flames intention to buy Ales Kotalik out. They just don't want his dollars on the Cap.
While TSN's Bob McKenzie had this to say:
I do not believe CGY intends to buy out Kotalik. More like "we can now bury you in the minors, maybe you want to play in Europe instead?"
CGY cant afford to use valuable cap space on buyout. Aim is to find spot for Kotalik where he doesnt count against cap and someone else pays
He also confirmed that a player put on waivers tomorrow could still be bought out if he clears on Thursday, and attested to the existence of a secondary buyout window following the conclusion of salary arbitration. CBC's Elliotte Friedman further complicated matters with these tweets earlier this afternoon:
One note about Kotalik: Flames did not put him on unconditional waivers, so he cannot be bought out. Maybe they will do it tomorrow...
...But, as of now, he is not eligible for buyout under CBA. The Oilers and Rangers players, for example, were put on unconditional waivers.
So Kotalik has cleared waivers and likely will not be bought out, as it appears the Flames have other plans for him that would take his cap hit off the books for good (i.e. Convincing him to leave North America and go home to Europe one year earlier than he had planned). I can't help but wonder if the two sides already have a deal in place behind closed doors, much like Marcus Nilson and Darryl Sutter did two summers ago, especially considering that Kotalik was reluctant to come to Calgary in the first place.
Reports in the Calgary Herald claim that Darryl Sutter is still trying to come to terms on a new deal with Chris Higgins' agent Matt Keator before free agency begins on Thursday, and the dollars saved with Kotalik's departure would help sweeten the pot, no doubt, but could also be put towards acquiring offensive talent through a trade or free agency.
In other Flames news, the team has signed recently acquired goalie Henrik Karlsson to a one-year, one-way $500,000 contract according to CapGeek, guaranteeing him the role of Kiprusoff's little-used back-up for next season. While Karlsson is unproven at the NHL level, he's twenty-six years old and comes significantly cheaper than any of the other worthwhile free agent 'tenders that will be on the market come July 1st, and comes off as a steal when his new salary is compared to the $1.325M cap hit he incurred last season.
That's it for now, stay tuned for updates on Kotalik's contract status and your long-awaited free agency primer coming up tomorrow.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I wouldn’t say Karlsson is guaranteed the backup role. If he fails to make the team, he might get loaned out to the KHL, taking him off the books.
Daz isn’t going to sign another goalie. Unless Keetley outperforms him significantly in training camp, it’s Karlsson’s job to lose.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Jun 29, 2010 6:58 PM PDT up reply actions
Or Shantz, or Irving, etc.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Jun 29, 2010 6:59 PM PDT up reply actions
Irving
Would have to be lights out better than Karlsson with his first round pick cap hit at close to $1.3. I’d say Henrik has the inside track.
by PrairieStew on Jun 30, 2010 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions
The NHL seems so passive-aggressive. “IMMA PUT U ON WAIVERS. TAKE A HINT”
How about just straight up saying “you cost too much for us. Please go to Europe, else we may have to place you in the AHL.”
HEY ALES, I LIKE YOUR WAIVERS, AND IMMA LET YOU FINISH, BUT NIGEL DAWES WAS THE GREATEST WAIVER PICKUP OF ALL TIME. OF ALL TIME!
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Jun 29, 2010 8:04 PM PDT up reply actions
Kotalik looks very much like a shifty account i once went to. It was a big mistake, but not millions of dollars in troublesome cap-era big mistake like the REAL Kotalik. The point being, i got screwed by that damn accountant!!!!
Darryl Sutter just offered me a NTC. I don't even know the guy..... And it was at an Irish bar.......
by Archbishop Rude on Jun 30, 2010 12:25 AM PDT reply actions
I’ve seen Karlsson play here in Sweden a bit and he is somewhat similar in style to Jonas Gustafsson. Big and calm.
As a side note, my father was part of the training staff on one of his former teams and only has good things to say about him.
by shep_ on Jun 30, 2010 4:20 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
Also played for håkan loobs Färjestad last season = good
by shep_ on Jun 30, 2010 4:22 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
Thanks for that link. Some of King’s comments certainly add some context to this piece by Eric Francis.
by Robert Cleave on Jun 30, 2010 8:01 AM PDT up reply actions
By the way, just read that Francis piece…I see what you mean by context. Had I not seen King’s quotes, I would have been "WTF is he talking about?!?! " Weak on Francis’ part to not source his article. So, if Tanguay signs and it works out does he then say, “Told you so!”
by TheBurnward on Jun 30, 2010 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions
I should add, apologies to Francis if this was posted before King’s newser. If it was, well done sir!
by TheBurnward on Jun 30, 2010 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions
Parts of Calgarypuck are melting down over that.
Reminds me a lot of the general attitude towards Boyd and Bertuzzi. Some fans look at the goals scored and go "OMG (t)he(y) was so great! WTF? When you look at the whole package, you see the player is less than he seems. Losing Dawes is not something to get upset over.
Dawes cost 850k and had strong stats across the board. From efficiency to possession to scoring chances. He’s an excellent bet to provide value for that cap hit. He’s also just 25 years old, right in the meaty part of an NHL players career arc.
Alone, he’s not going to make a huge difference either way, because like a the huge middle class in the league, he’s not a difference maker. His contract and age are favorable though.
And it’s rarely a bad thing to hold into a decent young player until they hit RFA status again, at the very least. I would assume Sutter decided he needed all the cap space he could spare RIGHTNOW.
by SmellOfVictory on Jun 30, 2010 7:25 PM PDT up reply actions
I get what you’re saying, it’s much like the Boyd deal. You don’t want GMs to be penny-wise and pound-foolish.
Still, there is no rationalization for this deal (none that make sense). Much like the Boyd deal, one begins to wonder about the underlying decision-making process.
Plus lately I’ve been questioning lately whether Sutter isn’t pound-foolish.

by 


























