Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Madonna Promises No Wardrobe Malfunctions

Cgy/Det Post Game - A Big One That Didn't Get Away

H2H Ice

Corsi

Faceoffs


 Scoring Chances

Through two periods, this sure appeared to be another in a long line of frustrating Flames games this year.  Playing a very good team with tough PvP matchups, the Flames were losing the top 6 battles, winning the bottom 6 battles, taking too many penalties, not giving up a ton of great chances but not generating many.  And they were down a goal.  And 2-16-3 on the year when trailing after two.  And playing a team that was 21-1-4 leading after two.  And on the road.

On the other hand, the Craig Conroy - David Moss - Niklas Hagman line had a lot of jump and was dominating the lesser lights for Detroit (I'm looking squarely at you, Sparklepants) and you just had a feeling they'd be rewarded in the 3rd period for their efforts.  Sure, it was hard watching Jarome Iginla, Matt Stajan and Rene Bourque in tough and generating next to nothing for two periods - incidentally, is Pavel Datsyuk not one of the top three players in the league, or is it just the Flames he looks so damn good against - but Conroy et al was about to break out!

Star-divide

And sure enough - Conroy et al continued to push the puck in the right direction and...continued not to score. So much for that theory.  But real life has a way of blowing theory out of the water.  Everyone on the team started going one-way (the good way) in the third period, including the big guns, and the whole team reaped the reward.

Six minutes into the period, the trio of Iggy, Stajan and Bourque managed to get onto the ice mid-shift against two defencemen not named Nicklas Lidstrom and Brian Rafalski (in this case, Brad Stuart and Niklas Kronwall) and a mix of forwards.  One nice blue-line to blue-line pass by Steve Staios later, the Flames had a mini three on two which ended up on Iggy's stick and in the net.  (In a sweet bit of irony, the forward late to the play was Datsyuk - the irony is that he wasn't quite in position to make a play because he'd just come on the ice for another forward who'd made a lazy slow change as the puck moved up ice - yes, Todd Bertuzzi just continues to give and give!).

Less than a minute later, after a 4th line shift was ended abruptly by Lidstrom knocking the stick out of Eric Nystrom's hands, the Stajan line came right back on and got the puck in deep again.  This pressure led to the winning goal, and the whole sequence was a good example of how forward matchups against the other team's forwards are as important (or more important) than matching up defencemen against the other team's forwards.  Detroit had also managed to change four of their five skaters - Lidstrom, Rafalski, Johan Franzen and Tomas Holmstrom.  But, Darren Helm was stuck out there instead of Datsyuk and he was a step behind the entire shift.  Including at the end of the shift when he was the first to fish the puck out of the net after Bourque's goal! 

Clearly, Datsyuk is the defensive conscience of that group and it was to the Flame's credit that they took advantage of his absence.  Charlie Simmer mentioned at least twice in the replay of the goal that the Flames made the quick change back to Iggy's line to get away from Lidstrom and how well it worked.  Never mind that the number 5 on the back Lidstrom's jersey took up half the screen while he was talking.  Announcers tend to fixate on the importance of getting the shutdown defense against the top line, but this goal was as good an indication as any how that is a short sighted fixation.

It's also to the coaching staff's credit that Calgary avoided "The Shell" once they took the lead.  The majority of the shots, faceoffs, and hits from the time of Bourque's goal to the Higgins goal (the what? let me check that again...yep, it definitely says Goal, Chris Higgins...) - anyway, the majority of events took place in the Red Wing zone.  Also, Sutter leaned on the top three lines nearly exclusively the last 13 minutes - the last shift Jamal Mayers took is the one that included the Staios hooking penalty, and that's the kind of ice time distribution in a one goal game that I can get behind.

Robert ended his game thread preamble with the following:

 As I've mentioned, this is the type of contest that might well give us a proper feel for where this Flames' season is headed.

Considering the opposition and the location of the game, this was the Flames' best effort since before the long losing streak.  I'd love to feel that this is an indication the Flames' season is headed to the postseason, but we've been burned too many times to feel that.  Nevertheless, it's two big points in a season where the Flames will need all they can get and it gets the blood pumping already for the Thursday home tilt with Ottawa.  As fans, that's all we can ask.

Random Notes:  Three games into Steve Staios' Flames career, he's 3-0.  Which shows just how great a trade that was to acquire him!  Honestly, I'm still not sure he's better than Adam Pardy (his poor positioning exemplified when he was forced to take a penalty mid-third period has been far too common) and his current top-4 defenceman role is cause for concern going forward.  But he is 3-0!...At least two times I saw Jay Bouwmeester jumping up on the play to provide offense, which is two more times than in a typical game.  Whether this lack of offensive impulse is a result of coaching or his own inhibitions I don't know.  But, to be as valuable as I think he can be, he needs to join the rush more often...Congratulations Mr. Higgins, eventually we'll all remember your first Flame goal as a critical shorthanded effort (never mind the empty net).  Nice to see the big smiles all around on the bench after that one.

Comment 41 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Great third period by the Flames. I was really glad that they didn’t quit after they gave up the second period lead.

Also, is it just me or does Detroit always get away with a ton of pick plays?

by Firefox444 on Mar 9, 2010 8:23 PM PST reply actions  

Wow. 3 goals in the 3rd period? I likey

by 44stampede on Mar 9, 2010 8:36 PM PST reply actions  

Holy crap maybe 6th place isn’t that far off.

Avs blow a 4-0 lead to fall to the Canucks 6-4. I knew the March to the Playoffs for them wouldn’t be cupcakes and sprinkles.

But right now the main goal is just to start pegging off these Wins one game at a time. Ottawa Thursday, @ Vancouver Sunday, Detroit Monday, @ Colorado on the 17th, San Jose on the 19th. Very very tough stretch and the Flames can really get their Home Record going and that will matter come April if they’re still playing and they way they’ve played the last three Bring it on!

What you see is, What you get.

GO FLAMES GO!!!

by CofRed on Mar 9, 2010 8:38 PM PST reply actions  

they = the.

must proofread more.

What you see is, What you get.

GO FLAMES GO!!!

by CofRed on Mar 9, 2010 8:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Bookie at Lowetide was noting the use of the upside down exclamation point that some African cultures use as a mark to denote sarcasm. With that in mind:

Three games into Steve Staios’ Flames career, he’s 3-0.

That’s because he’s awesome, maimster ¡

Detroit didn’t seem to have much in the tank tonight once the Flames didn’t roll over after two. Hopefully that trend continues.

by Robert Cleave on Mar 9, 2010 8:42 PM PST reply actions  

The tilde isn’t universal eh

by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 9, 2010 9:00 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Great analysis…
As someone else noticed re: Staios, he’s also been on the ice for every single even strength goal in those 3 games.
But those “intangibles” like “leadership” and “veteran presence” must be making the difference.

by Wittmeier on Mar 9, 2010 9:08 PM PST up reply actions  

he’s also been on the ice for a hell of a lot of goals against in those three games.

by walkinvisible on Mar 9, 2010 9:09 PM PST up reply actions  

yes, I meant every single goal against

by Wittmeier on Mar 9, 2010 9:10 PM PST up reply actions  

great summary, maimster !!!! please note the right-side-up punctuation….. huge congrats to higgins. <3

also, um, has anyone else noticed that ottawa is tied with edmonton at ones after two ??? oh how the mighty have fallen…

by walkinvisible on Mar 9, 2010 8:48 PM PST reply actions  

They lead now but still they remind of the Flames of last year. VERY VERY STREAKY.

What you see is, What you get.

GO FLAMES GO!!!

by CofRed on Mar 9, 2010 8:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Geez. Even we can beat Edmonton!

Go Flames Go
Goals? Where we're going, we don't need goals.

by Justin Azevedo on Mar 10, 2010 2:00 AM PST up reply actions  

Just a great post-game Maimster, I dig your detailed analysis.

I spent most of the game cooking so what I saw of the game was at an angle to the TV but a ton of the action seemed to end up in our zone for the first 30. And the opposite for the last 30.

I did read through the game thread and noticed that RCleave mentioned that Stajan played well :-) which is awesome of course, I would rather really be wrong about him. From Maimster’s post-game it seems like Iggy and co. were being put in primo offensive situations? Not a bad way to go at all.

by R O on Mar 9, 2010 9:02 PM PST reply actions  

I just threw that in to see if you were paying attention, R O ;-) He did have a terrific shift on the Bourque goal which won’t be reflected on the score sheet. That line really was in a bad way in the first part of the game, but they were cash money in the third, so your surmise certainly describes their night to a tee.

by Robert Cleave on Mar 9, 2010 9:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh yeah two things I did see were Staois with that post plus Staois on that odd-man getting behind the opposing defence.

Again! That’s twice in three games!

I don’t watch too many Oilers games but I’m pretty sure this is a record for him.

by R O on Mar 9, 2010 9:04 PM PST reply actions  

When he had better legs in the early part of his Oiler tenure, my memory seems to be that he made a few more of those forays.

by Robert Cleave on Mar 9, 2010 9:12 PM PST up reply actions  

I can’t get too down against Staios since he’s been on for a whack of chances against but also a whack of chances for. Plus he’s playing tough comp behind our defacto first line (or whatever you want to call it, it’s not quite a PVP line) and is still managing to chip in on some glorious chances too.

Damn the other game he looked 25 again the way he joined the rush with Iggy. But he’s got 40 year old hands, probably why he became a defenseman in the first place :-)

by R O on Mar 9, 2010 9:12 PM PST reply actions  

i will freely admitthat i prefer staios on the “top pairing” over sarich. so i guess that’s good.

by walkinvisible on Mar 9, 2010 9:38 PM PST up reply actions  

He had another rush like that last night.
~ Maybe we don’t give Sutter enough credit sometimes. ~

Go Flames Go
Goals? Where we're going, we don't need goals.

by Justin Azevedo on Mar 10, 2010 2:02 AM PST up reply actions  

Azevedo giving credit to Kotalik now Sutter, what a turnaround from a week or two ago

by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 10, 2010 7:04 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

It just occurred to me – Steve Staios is our new Dion Phaneuf! :-)

by maimster on Mar 10, 2010 7:20 AM PST up reply actions  

Only 5 points back of Colorado now!
Stat of the week: on their current road trip, the Vancouver Canucks are 8-5, even though they have been outscored 25-6 in the first period of said roadtrip. (!!!)

Go Flames Go
Goals? Where we're going, we don't need goals.

by Justin Azevedo on Mar 10, 2010 2:05 AM PST reply actions  

Yeah they have the Mariano Riviera of hockey. The Copenhagen Closer Jannik Hansen, always clutching up late in the 3rd

by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 10, 2010 7:05 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Imagine where we would be if the Avs had the same luck against us that they do against Vancouver? Sorry Colorado, but the bounces won’t always go your way, even if Anderson is a hell of a goalie.

by Resolute on Mar 10, 2010 7:14 AM PST up reply actions  

thank you guys for beating detroit

we in st louis needed it

"HOLY JUMPIN!"

by stlAJ on Mar 10, 2010 4:56 AM PST reply actions  

That was good

Now to repeat it against Ottawa on Thursday (otherwise my co-workers will be all over me… again). Living in Ottawa sucks as a Flames fan, especially when Ottawa is rolling your team.

by brisulph on Mar 10, 2010 6:40 AM PST reply actions  

staios

brings a lot of intangibles to the table with his leadership. Unfortunately, this is seemingly at the cost of any tangibles he possesses.

by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 10, 2010 7:03 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

Pretty damn obvious that the Wings are not the Wings of old anymore. They weren’t that special all night long – playing for their playoff lives no less. Even when we went down 2-1, it felt that if we were going to lose, it wouldn’t have been because of anything great that Detroit did. Glad to see the Flames come back hard in the third.

Confidence is picking up at the right time – though later than I would have liked – and we’re starting to get friendly bounces again. Top line is scoring, and a lot of guys who were in the doldrums for so long are coming out of it. Thank effing god!

Target has to be 6th place – Vancouver/Colorado will, as usual, be the easiest opponent for the teams in the bottom half of the bracket, but San Jose is vulnerable too. Chicago would probably kill us, but part of me would be happy with an 8th place finish and a chance to knock them off.

by Resolute on Mar 10, 2010 7:17 AM PST reply actions  

I think Lady Luck decided that she had punished the Flames enough….or at least I hope so. It’s actually nice to see a lucky bounce FOR Calgary this time around, and the GWG no less.

by Avalain on Mar 10, 2010 7:27 AM PST reply actions  

Was at the game last night, what a game! Really happy with the performance from most of the guys, Kotalik was shaky out there. Conroy was good one shift, horrible the next. Sarich didn’t take any stupid penalties so that was a plus. Gio took a shot off the leg, limped off, but was back out a few minutes later, was scared for a minute, LOVE that he owned Berts. The way I saw it, it was a pretty defensive battle and the first half of the game the Flames were trying to be too pretty, any shift when they cycled and got the puck to the net was when they were having success, hard work pays off as they got the two somewhat chip in/garbage goals at the end. We’ll take em however we can get em!

by dotfras on Mar 10, 2010 10:01 AM PST reply actions  

just watched the last two periods.

lidström is such an intelligent player. computerlike.

4-28 and 22-21 is just the unit you want out on the ice in the end.

old man conroy looked better than vs the wild.

28-3 had a good game, 6-5 can really shut down bottom 6 opposition. love 4.

11 looks a bit slower than usual, maybe a leg/foot injury?

first unit looks good, good thing sutter finally elevated 17 to it.

by shep_ on Mar 10, 2010 12:57 PM PST reply actions  

Hags did jam his knee on the bench door in the 1st period I believe so maybe it was lingering through out the game.

What you see is, What you get.

GO FLAMES GO!!!

by CofRed on Mar 10, 2010 1:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Scoring chances. Iginla’s been on the ice for 19 scoring chances for in the last 2 games.

That’s more like it, folks.

by Kent Wilson on Mar 11, 2010 7:10 AM PST reply actions  

Big third period there. Comsidering that the bulk of the Flames EV chances in that period landed when they were tied/leading… and considering that we ended the game in the black… huge game.

by R O on Mar 11, 2010 11:09 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

He’s been noticeably better for several weeks now. You could see his play rebounding back in a positive direction before the Olympics.

by Resolute on Mar 11, 2010 11:54 AM PST up reply actions  

And then the real upsurge since he and Bourque have had a shot together. Funny how that happens…

by SarahM on Mar 11, 2010 1:20 PM PST up reply actions  

why are bloggers not coaches ? or, more specifically, why do coaches not consult the blogs ?

by walkinvisible on Mar 11, 2010 3:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Because they don’t want to be associated with recluses who live in their parents collective basements.

Go Flames Go
Goals? Where we're going, we don't need goals.

by Justin Azevedo on Mar 11, 2010 6:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Calgary Flames.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Funny-pictures-chippy-the-attack-gopher-1hv_small
20 wins required
Necks_small
Dave Shoalts says ridiculous stuff about goaltending
Needles_small
New Team, for me anyway...
Necks_small
Are the Flames the team where Shooting Percentage comes to die?
Lax-xl_small
Flames and Roughnecks
Funny-pictures-chippy-the-attack-gopher-1hv_small
Defensive imbalance

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 51 31 15 5 67
Minnesota 51 25 19 7 57
Colorado 53 26 25 2 54
Calgary 51 23 22 6 52
Edmonton 51 20 26 5 45

(updated 2.3.2012 at 6:29 AM PST)

24 - 22 - 6

Won 1


Certified Executives of the Office of Management

52987_1302804284_tb_small ArikJames

Photo_71_small Hayley

Officiants of the Bureau of Editing

Ryan_small SO_RyanP

Dsc03339_small Mitch Smith

Bureaucrats

E571c235251f6540d35494b73d613163_small Justin Azevedo

Luongo_small DownGoesLuongo

Redfordnewmanbutchcassidy19_small Scott Lepp

Mcinnismonday_small BookoflooB