Cgy/Det Post Game - A Big One That Didn't Get Away
Through two periods, this sure appeared to be another in a long line of frustrating Flames games this year. Playing a very good team with tough PvP matchups, the Flames were losing the top 6 battles, winning the bottom 6 battles, taking too many penalties, not giving up a ton of great chances but not generating many. And they were down a goal. And 2-16-3 on the year when trailing after two. And playing a team that was 21-1-4 leading after two. And on the road.
On the other hand, the Craig Conroy - David Moss - Niklas Hagman line had a lot of jump and was dominating the lesser lights for Detroit (I'm looking squarely at you, Sparklepants) and you just had a feeling they'd be rewarded in the 3rd period for their efforts. Sure, it was hard watching Jarome Iginla, Matt Stajan and Rene Bourque in tough and generating next to nothing for two periods - incidentally, is Pavel Datsyuk not one of the top three players in the league, or is it just the Flames he looks so damn good against - but Conroy et al was about to break out!
And sure enough - Conroy et al continued to push the puck in the right direction and...continued not to score. So much for that theory. But real life has a way of blowing theory out of the water. Everyone on the team started going one-way (the good way) in the third period, including the big guns, and the whole team reaped the reward.
Six minutes into the period, the trio of Iggy, Stajan and Bourque managed to get onto the ice mid-shift against two defencemen not named Nicklas Lidstrom and Brian Rafalski (in this case, Brad Stuart and Niklas Kronwall) and a mix of forwards. One nice blue-line to blue-line pass by Steve Staios later, the Flames had a mini three on two which ended up on Iggy's stick and in the net. (In a sweet bit of irony, the forward late to the play was Datsyuk - the irony is that he wasn't quite in position to make a play because he'd just come on the ice for another forward who'd made a lazy slow change as the puck moved up ice - yes, Todd Bertuzzi just continues to give and give!).
Less than a minute later, after a 4th line shift was ended abruptly by Lidstrom knocking the stick out of Eric Nystrom's hands, the Stajan line came right back on and got the puck in deep again. This pressure led to the winning goal, and the whole sequence was a good example of how forward matchups against the other team's forwards are as important (or more important) than matching up defencemen against the other team's forwards. Detroit had also managed to change four of their five skaters - Lidstrom, Rafalski, Johan Franzen and Tomas Holmstrom. But, Darren Helm was stuck out there instead of Datsyuk and he was a step behind the entire shift. Including at the end of the shift when he was the first to fish the puck out of the net after Bourque's goal!
Clearly, Datsyuk is the defensive conscience of that group and it was to the Flame's credit that they took advantage of his absence. Charlie Simmer mentioned at least twice in the replay of the goal that the Flames made the quick change back to Iggy's line to get away from Lidstrom and how well it worked. Never mind that the number 5 on the back Lidstrom's jersey took up half the screen while he was talking. Announcers tend to fixate on the importance of getting the shutdown defense against the top line, but this goal was as good an indication as any how that is a short sighted fixation.
It's also to the coaching staff's credit that Calgary avoided "The Shell" once they took the lead. The majority of the shots, faceoffs, and hits from the time of Bourque's goal to the Higgins goal (the what? let me check that again...yep, it definitely says Goal, Chris Higgins...) - anyway, the majority of events took place in the Red Wing zone. Also, Sutter leaned on the top three lines nearly exclusively the last 13 minutes - the last shift Jamal Mayers took is the one that included the Staios hooking penalty, and that's the kind of ice time distribution in a one goal game that I can get behind.
Robert ended his game thread preamble with the following:
As I've mentioned, this is the type of contest that might well give us a proper feel for where this Flames' season is headed.
Considering the opposition and the location of the game, this was the Flames' best effort since before the long losing streak. I'd love to feel that this is an indication the Flames' season is headed to the postseason, but we've been burned too many times to feel that. Nevertheless, it's two big points in a season where the Flames will need all they can get and it gets the blood pumping already for the Thursday home tilt with Ottawa. As fans, that's all we can ask.
Random Notes: Three games into Steve Staios' Flames career, he's 3-0. Which shows just how great a trade that was to acquire him! Honestly, I'm still not sure he's better than Adam Pardy (his poor positioning exemplified when he was forced to take a penalty mid-third period has been far too common) and his current top-4 defenceman role is cause for concern going forward. But he is 3-0!...At least two times I saw Jay Bouwmeester jumping up on the play to provide offense, which is two more times than in a typical game. Whether this lack of offensive impulse is a result of coaching or his own inhibitions I don't know. But, to be as valuable as I think he can be, he needs to join the rush more often...Congratulations Mr. Higgins, eventually we'll all remember your first Flame goal as a critical shorthanded effort (never mind the empty net). Nice to see the big smiles all around on the bench after that one.
41 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Holy crap maybe 6th place isn’t that far off.
Avs blow a 4-0 lead to fall to the Canucks 6-4. I knew the March to the Playoffs for them wouldn’t be cupcakes and sprinkles.
But right now the main goal is just to start pegging off these Wins one game at a time. Ottawa Thursday, @ Vancouver Sunday, Detroit Monday, @ Colorado on the 17th, San Jose on the 19th. Very very tough stretch and the Flames can really get their Home Record going and that will matter come April if they’re still playing and they way they’ve played the last three Bring it on!
What you see is, What you get.
GO FLAMES GO!!!
Bookie at Lowetide was noting the use of the upside down exclamation point that some African cultures use as a mark to denote sarcasm. With that in mind:
Three games into Steve Staios’ Flames career, he’s 3-0.
That’s because he’s awesome, maimster ¡
Detroit didn’t seem to have much in the tank tonight once the Flames didn’t roll over after two. Hopefully that trend continues.
The tilde isn’t universal eh
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 9, 2010 9:00 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Great analysis…
As someone else noticed re: Staios, he’s also been on the ice for every single even strength goal in those 3 games.
But those “intangibles” like “leadership” and “veteran presence” must be making the difference.
he’s also been on the ice for a hell of a lot of goals against in those three games.
by walkinvisible on Mar 9, 2010 9:09 PM PST up reply actions
great summary, maimster !!!! please note the right-side-up punctuation….. huge congrats to higgins. <3
also, um, has anyone else noticed that ottawa is tied with edmonton at ones after two ??? oh how the mighty have fallen…
Geez. Even we can beat Edmonton!
Go Flames Go
Goals? Where we're going, we don't need goals.
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 10, 2010 2:00 AM PST up reply actions
Just a great post-game Maimster, I dig your detailed analysis.
I spent most of the game cooking so what I saw of the game was at an angle to the TV but a ton of the action seemed to end up in our zone for the first 30. And the opposite for the last 30.
I did read through the game thread and noticed that RCleave mentioned that Stajan played well :-) which is awesome of course, I would rather really be wrong about him. From Maimster’s post-game it seems like Iggy and co. were being put in primo offensive situations? Not a bad way to go at all.
I just threw that in to see if you were paying attention, R O ;-) He did have a terrific shift on the Bourque goal which won’t be reflected on the score sheet. That line really was in a bad way in the first part of the game, but they were cash money in the third, so your surmise certainly describes their night to a tee.
by Robert Cleave on Mar 9, 2010 9:07 PM PST up reply actions
Oh yeah two things I did see were Staois with that post plus Staois on that odd-man getting behind the opposing defence.
Again! That’s twice in three games!
I don’t watch too many Oilers games but I’m pretty sure this is a record for him.
When he had better legs in the early part of his Oiler tenure, my memory seems to be that he made a few more of those forays.
by Robert Cleave on Mar 9, 2010 9:12 PM PST up reply actions
I can’t get too down against Staios since he’s been on for a whack of chances against but also a whack of chances for. Plus he’s playing tough comp behind our defacto first line (or whatever you want to call it, it’s not quite a PVP line) and is still managing to chip in on some glorious chances too.
Damn the other game he looked 25 again the way he joined the rush with Iggy. But he’s got 40 year old hands, probably why he became a defenseman in the first place :-)
i will freely admitthat i prefer staios on the “top pairing” over sarich. so i guess that’s good.
by walkinvisible on Mar 9, 2010 9:38 PM PST up reply actions
He had another rush like that last night.
~ Maybe we don’t give Sutter enough credit sometimes. ~
Go Flames Go
Goals? Where we're going, we don't need goals.
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 10, 2010 2:02 AM PST up reply actions
Azevedo giving credit to Kotalik now Sutter, what a turnaround from a week or two ago
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 10, 2010 7:04 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Only 5 points back of Colorado now!
Stat of the week: on their current road trip, the Vancouver Canucks are 8-5, even though they have been outscored 25-6 in the first period of said roadtrip. (!!!)
Go Flames Go
Goals? Where we're going, we don't need goals.
Yeah they have the Mariano Riviera of hockey. The Copenhagen Closer Jannik Hansen, always clutching up late in the 3rd
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 10, 2010 7:05 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
That was good
Now to repeat it against Ottawa on Thursday (otherwise my co-workers will be all over me… again). Living in Ottawa sucks as a Flames fan, especially when Ottawa is rolling your team.
staios
brings a lot of intangibles to the table with his leadership. Unfortunately, this is seemingly at the cost of any tangibles he possesses.
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 10, 2010 7:03 AM PST via mobile reply actions
Pretty damn obvious that the Wings are not the Wings of old anymore. They weren’t that special all night long – playing for their playoff lives no less. Even when we went down 2-1, it felt that if we were going to lose, it wouldn’t have been because of anything great that Detroit did. Glad to see the Flames come back hard in the third.
Confidence is picking up at the right time – though later than I would have liked – and we’re starting to get friendly bounces again. Top line is scoring, and a lot of guys who were in the doldrums for so long are coming out of it. Thank effing god!
Target has to be 6th place – Vancouver/Colorado will, as usual, be the easiest opponent for the teams in the bottom half of the bracket, but San Jose is vulnerable too. Chicago would probably kill us, but part of me would be happy with an 8th place finish and a chance to knock them off.
Was at the game last night, what a game! Really happy with the performance from most of the guys, Kotalik was shaky out there. Conroy was good one shift, horrible the next. Sarich didn’t take any stupid penalties so that was a plus. Gio took a shot off the leg, limped off, but was back out a few minutes later, was scared for a minute, LOVE that he owned Berts. The way I saw it, it was a pretty defensive battle and the first half of the game the Flames were trying to be too pretty, any shift when they cycled and got the puck to the net was when they were having success, hard work pays off as they got the two somewhat chip in/garbage goals at the end. We’ll take em however we can get em!
just watched the last two periods.
lidström is such an intelligent player. computerlike.
4-28 and 22-21 is just the unit you want out on the ice in the end.
old man conroy looked better than vs the wild.
28-3 had a good game, 6-5 can really shut down bottom 6 opposition. love 4.
11 looks a bit slower than usual, maybe a leg/foot injury?
first unit looks good, good thing sutter finally elevated 17 to it.
Scoring chances. Iginla’s been on the ice for 19 scoring chances for in the last 2 games.
That’s more like it, folks.
Big third period there. Comsidering that the bulk of the Flames EV chances in that period landed when they were tied/leading… and considering that we ended the game in the black… huge game.
by R O on Mar 11, 2010 11:09 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
He’s been noticeably better for several weeks now. You could see his play rebounding back in a positive direction before the Olympics.
why are bloggers not coaches ? or, more specifically, why do coaches not consult the blogs ?
by walkinvisible on Mar 11, 2010 3:21 PM PST up reply actions
Because they don’t want to be associated with recluses who live in their parents collective basements.
Go Flames Go
Goals? Where we're going, we don't need goals.
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 11, 2010 6:21 PM PST up reply actions

by 




























