Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Josh Hamilton's Unique Public Statement On His Addiction

Flames/Devils Post-Game - 5 Goals, 25 Feet

H2H Ice

Corsi

Face-offs

Scoring Chances



Alright, raise your hand if you thought the game was over at the end of the first period.  Come on now, raise it up - don't pretend you weren't skeptical the Flames would ever score a goal again.  Hell, I missed the first period and wasn't sure I wanted to kill the rest of my Friday night watching periods two and three.  Fortunately, I recalled that I rarely have anything better to do on a Friday night, and thus watched Daymond Langkow open the heavens. 

And it is fitting that Langkow got the goal (his first in 22 games - wow!), if only because he's been one of the stars of the comments here on M&G lately - should he be traded, is he valuable, with whom he should play.  It's also fitting the goal covered five feet or so from stick to goal-line, because that was the theme of the night (and not coincidentally, the subject of coach Sutter's discussion with the media after the game on Wednesday night against the Wild.

Star-divide

Let's start with that point.  Clearly the Flames were sending more guys at the net and trying to get into the dirty areas.  Langkow's goal came after a minute plus of zone pressure (punctuated by two separate icings by the Devils and Sutter stopping himself from putting out the 4th line for the advantageous faceoff).  Chris Higgins did a lot of the dirty work.  He continues to show the fans heart and effort and puck-driving results.  Hopefully he is also showing the rest of the league that he needs a pay cut because he can't score.

Eric Nystrom had his second strong game in a row - perhaps he just needs 2-3 week breaks every 20 games or so, because he looked like this at the beginning of the year two.  And he was rewarded with a great goal (that also traveled five feet - note the pattern).  David Moss popped in a rebound (one of the many which a pretty shaky Martin Brodeur gave up), as did Matt Stajan.  Even Curtis Glencross' goal was from relatively close-in (never mind he skated 140 feet with the puck first to get there).   That man is nails on a breakaway - ironically his only shootout attempt this year was in Anaheim after Iggy tied it up late (he scored a breakaway goal that game as well) and the story the next day was "why was Glencross shooting instead of Jarome Iginla". 

Does this mean that the Flames are finally buying into "the system"?  Of course it doesn't.  It was just one game. There is no point in trying to reach some overriding conclusion after this effort, coming as it does on the heels of that depressing game on Wednesday.  It is certainly a positive that every forward but one got on the scoresheet, and I suppose Jamal Mayers made up for that with the two scraps.  It is absolutely a positive that the Flames didn't go into a defensive shell in the third period, even if the four or five straight shifts they were stuck in their end early in the third made it look that way. 

However, more evidence is required, which is life as a fan. Coming out of the break, a reasonable estimate was they need 13 wins in 20 games.  Two games later they need 12 in 18.  Onwards to Minnesota!

Random Notes:  Jarome Iginla stickhandles a lot, doesn't he.  When he's carrying the puck through the neutral zone, he is chopping up the ice like nobody's business.  Has he always done that?  Or is it just more noticable now that he loses it in the offensive zone much more regularly...Rene Bourque playing with Iggy seems like the best thing for the team on paper, but he always looks like a better player to my eye playing with others.  Perhaps the solution is putting instant chemistry (Langkow) between Iggy and Bourque.  Hmmm, wonder if anyone has considered that before...Discussion disparaging Langkow's defensive coverage are ridiculous.  I stopped counting the number of times he was first to the puck in the defensive end and he's nearly always in the right place. However, I wish he was a little stronger on the puck once he has gained possession, sometimes he's a little bit cute with it...It's probably too late now but clearly the coaching staff hasn't evaluated their defensemen enough to have figured out a true shutdown D pairing.  I thought all the D pairs were a bit shaky...I could write a whole column on my frustrations with the Flame's breakout, but we'll leave that for another day.

Comment 17 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

shutdown d

Yeah hard to say who those guys are. I hope that’s not why staios was brought in for.. My god

by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 6, 2010 8:55 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

Good stuff Maimster. On Langkow being too cute with the puck, the only thing that really sticks out in my mind is this one instance, don’t remember the game though, where he mishandled an easy clear on a PK right at the blueline and it ended up in the back of our net. I think we lost that game too.

Higgins is a beast, what can I say. If he keeps playing like this we have another Bourque. He is so strong on the boards and so fast to get off of them into open ice that I can’t imagine that he won’t score 20 playing tough minutes next season, should we keep him.

by R O on Mar 6, 2010 10:13 AM PST reply actions  

Agreed on Higgins, I really like watching him play. I’ve generally not been as hard on Daz as most, but I am really perplexed at how he’s gone from locking up a small core and giving himself flexibility around that core to locking up nearly a whole roster for next year. And Higgins is one guy who is not locked up, yet right now I’d prefer him to Stajan, Hagman, or Kotalik amongst forwards.

by maimster on Mar 6, 2010 10:33 AM PST up reply actions  

By the way, the Langkow play I was thinking about last night, he was the first guy back getting a puck on the defensive boards after a NJ dump in, and he started to take it around the net but then tried a backhand chip past the persuing Devil to a teammate, probably thinking it was a bit of deception. However, it seemed obvious to me as a viewer that he was going to do that, and in fact it was intercepted and caused a bit of pressure in the zone. He does that from time to time.

Also, I love Langkow but you have to admit that he’s an easy target if he’s not scoring. And that isn’t completely unfair, either. At the end of the day, he does need goals and points to justify his salary and though there is a lot of luck/matchups/teammates involved, he has been deficient on the scoresheet this season.

by maimster on Mar 6, 2010 11:18 AM PST up reply actions  

re: Iginla, I think he’s always been a frequent stickhandler, but when he was more explosive, you didn’t notice as much because while he was stickhandling he was also plowing through three guys and scoring a goal so it got lost in the awesomeness a bit.

by SmellOfVictory on Mar 6, 2010 11:01 AM PST reply actions  

I don’t know how Nystrom’s goal wasn’t a HON Candidate oh that’s right he’s not Alex Ovechkin or Luca Cuputi.

What you see is, What you get.

GO FLAMES GO!!!

by CofRed on Mar 6, 2010 11:34 AM PST reply actions  

the dude scored whilst on his ass. that should def count for something, methinks. i also thought glenX might get a nod simply for the way he totally undressed two of the league’s elite guys.

by walkinvisible on Mar 6, 2010 11:53 AM PST up reply actions  

Just finished tallying the scoring chances.

The Flames got lucky on this one. They’re owed one, so that’s okay, but there was no real step forward here. They managed all of 12 scoring chances and almost half of them (!) went in.

Also – Iginla was stunningly ineffective for the second straight night.

by Kent Wilson on Mar 6, 2010 12:32 PM PST reply actions  

Getting exactly 1 minute of PP time will do that to you.

I don’t think it was a step forward either. But, as I said in the previous thread I thought they played a good game against Minny so treading in place when your forwards are already doing good things is okay by me.

That said, what a terrible first period. I thought we were better than 1-4 at EVs but I guess not.

by R O on Mar 6, 2010 1:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Everything the Flames did in the first was from the outside, unfortunately. They dominated the second, but again it’s mostly the bottom end of the roster doing it. If we had the first line managing more than 2 chances in 18 minutes minutes of ice, we’d have something here.

by Kent Wilson on Mar 6, 2010 1:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Maybe if the centre on the first line wasn’t being paid $4.5M to be poor defensively.

Wait what, you mean we aren’t playing Langkow on that first line??

Stajan on that first line is abominable. Iggy isn’t much better but half the time he’s carrying the puck in without support in the middle.

by R O on Mar 6, 2010 1:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Jarome is part of the problem for me. He loses the puck all over the ice these days. He’s not bad defensively, but he’s certainly “lax” at times.

He can’t be deployed against other teams top lines, or he’ll lose. I don’t even know at this point if the addition of Langkow would fix things.

by Kent Wilson on Mar 6, 2010 1:54 PM PST up reply actions  

Thanks, Kent. Added to the front page…

by maimster on Mar 6, 2010 4:05 PM PST up reply actions  

I think that describes everyone in here.

What you see is, What you get.

GO FLAMES GO!!!

by CofRed on Mar 6, 2010 1:33 PM PST up reply actions  

i think that describes everyone OUTSIDE of here. ;)

by walkinvisible on Mar 6, 2010 2:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh yeah I get ya, The Spring of 2004 fans.

What you see is, What you get.

GO FLAMES GO!!!

by CofRed on Mar 6, 2010 2:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Calgary Flames.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Funny-pictures-chippy-the-attack-gopher-1hv_small
20 wins required
Necks_small
Dave Shoalts says ridiculous stuff about goaltending
Needles_small
New Team, for me anyway...
Necks_small
Are the Flames the team where Shooting Percentage comes to die?
Lax-xl_small
Flames and Roughnecks
Funny-pictures-chippy-the-attack-gopher-1hv_small
Defensive imbalance

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 51 31 15 5 67
Minnesota 51 25 19 7 57
Calgary 52 24 22 6 54
Colorado 53 26 25 2 54
Edmonton 51 20 26 5 45

(updated 2.4.2012 at 12:36 AM PST)

24 - 22 - 6

Won 1


Certified Executives of the Office of Management

52987_1302804284_tb_small ArikJames

Photo_71_small Hayley

Officiants of the Bureau of Editing

Ryan_small SO_RyanP

Dsc03339_small Mitch Smith

Bureaucrats

E571c235251f6540d35494b73d613163_small Justin Azevedo

Luongo_small DownGoesLuongo

Redfordnewmanbutchcassidy19_small Scott Lepp

Mcinnismonday_small BookoflooB