Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Madonna Promises No Wardrobe Malfunctions

The Staios deal is a mess. Whatever "intangibles" he adds to the roster are likely to fall well short of his relatively expensive contract. Unless he regains the sort of on-ice form he showed years ago, Staios is a bad bet to provide value for his contract and is a toxic asset - one which was happily expunged by the rather hapless organization up north.

It's a move that smacks of a man either lost in the past or completely out of ideas.

My look at the Steve Staois acquisition.

almost 2 years ago Photo_34_tiny Kent Wilson 19 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I have liked a total of one moves by Sutter in the past two years, and it came yesterday when we got rid of MacBackup. That’s really sad.

Go Flames Go
Goals? Where we're going, we don't need goals.

by Justin Azevedo on Mar 4, 2010 11:51 AM PST reply actions  

Yeah despite the fact that he’s Toskalol he’s still better then McE (although if I was ownership I’d really question why management is going to be spending so much money of my money on a guy whose principle job will be opening the door).

by Parallex on Mar 4, 2010 12:02 PM PST up reply actions  

I liked the Primeau trade personally (Which Daz then ruined by trading Stralman).

by Parallex on Mar 5, 2010 12:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Have we really acquired another Cory Sarich? I more get the impression that it’s another Jim Vandermeer.

Really thou… I cast my vote with the “Lost in the Past” option. Honestly, I’m not to far away from thinking D. Sutter should just be given his gold watch, thanked for his years of service and then shown (and pushed through if need be) the door. Preferably before the draft and before he can hand out any more contracts with NTC (modified or otherwise).

by Parallex on Mar 4, 2010 11:58 AM PST reply actions  

I think it’s more of a Sarich because of his salary, although he performs about as well as him too.

Go Flames Go
Goals? Where we're going, we don't need goals.

by Justin Azevedo on Mar 4, 2010 12:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Vandermeer and Warrener are good comparables too. I only compared to Sarich in that sentence because, rhetorically, I was talking about the Flames getting rid of him in favor of cap space…

by Kent Wilson on Mar 4, 2010 12:16 PM PST reply actions  

Kent, I’m convinced Sutter will be given the green light to bury Staios next season. He’s making only $700k than Eriksson did.

In fact, I don’t think a trade for an extra $2M or so in real money paid happens without approval from ownership, whether implicit (“Darryl, you’re in charge of the hockey decisions”) or explicit (“Darryl, you can trade for Staios”).

Myself I hate the deal but that’s with my owner’s hat on. Who in their right mind would pay $2M more than they have to for 20 regular season games and one to two postseasons of Staios? But it’s not my money and RCleave points out often that the Flames are pretty easy going with the purse strings.

I’m pretty sure that Staios is probably at least equivalent if not better than Johnson (I think Johnson wasn’t that good). That’s not something I pay $2M for but with my fan hat on I’m not nearly as panicked as I was yesterday.

The real kick in the nuts is that we have to wait yet again (and maybe forever) to see if Sutter will make any real impact moves.

by R O on Mar 4, 2010 12:40 PM PST reply actions  

Then the owners, to put it bluntly, are dupes and pawns. Aaron Ward, a similar player, could have been had yesterday and his contract expires next season. Paying $2.7M next year and whatever he’s owed this year for a 19 game stretch run (where he’s mostly certainly guaranteed not to be any kind of difference maker one way or the other) is just this side of insanity.

by Kent Wilson on Mar 4, 2010 12:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Then the owners, to put it bluntly, are dupes and pawns.

Yup. They’ll pay more than I’ll ever see in my lifetime to give the Heat veteran leadership next year. Rich people, I tell ya.

by R O on Mar 4, 2010 1:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Rich and old. Thats a bit of the problem. They want to win before they die, so Sutter gets more leeway then he should re: the owners money, in my opinion.

So…Domebeers.com would look cool on the blogroll.

Furthermore, I think Peter Loubardias should be fired.

by Domebeers.com on Mar 4, 2010 2:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Some food for thought…

This past offseason Sutter fixed some mistakes he made overpaying for depth (with Vandermeer & Primeau… costing us draft position in the process for Primeau) and instead made a new mistake (overspending on blueliners, underspending on forwards) so he went out and dealt one of the big ticket d-men for quality forwards but in the process brought in an overpaid depth forward (Jamal Mayers) and later an overpaid d-man (Steve Staois).

So we’re basically back where we were pre-deadline last year except that we have different acters playing the same role.

by Parallex on Mar 4, 2010 1:34 PM PST reply actions  

If he’s still in office by the offseason watch him sign Kovalchuk and Marleau to outrageous contracts. He has yet to go the severely-overpaid-elite-forward route yet, and I think that’s his next project.

by SmellOfVictory on Mar 4, 2010 4:12 PM PST up reply actions  

He’d to expunge a huge amount of cash to do that. The Flames have a pretty set roster in terms of contracts next (17 players at $53M+)

by Kent Wilson on Mar 4, 2010 4:50 PM PST up reply actions  

He will find a way. I believe in him.

by SmellOfVictory on Mar 4, 2010 7:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Of course, it would make far more sense to not take on useless contracts in the first place (Eirksson, Primeau, Vandermeer, Zyuzin, Nilson, Kotalik, Staios, Warrener…)

by Kent Wilson on Mar 4, 2010 7:52 PM PST up reply actions  

I’m sure if he pairs them with a bunch more picks he can dump them all. :D

by SmellOfVictory on Mar 4, 2010 9:26 PM PST up reply actions  

That feels like a shot at Domebeers, you know how we love us some Ilya.

I’ve been thinking, and maybe I’ll write a post on it, but there has to be some number that no one is worth. Like how many points do you gotta get to be worth 10 million in cap for X years, ect.

by Domebeers.com on Mar 5, 2010 1:45 PM PST reply actions  

I’ve been thinking, and maybe I’ll write a post on it, but there has to be some number that no one is worth.

The 20% salary max renders this a bit moot. For instance, this was looked at here and here, the conclusion being that if you’re looking at marginal points per marginal dollar, some players (Ovechkin, Crosby) can’t be paid enough. You could give them $11M over a reasonable term (5-7 years let’s say) and they would still be value contracts.

by R O on Mar 5, 2010 2:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Calgary Flames.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Funny-pictures-chippy-the-attack-gopher-1hv_small
20 wins required
Necks_small
Dave Shoalts says ridiculous stuff about goaltending
Needles_small
New Team, for me anyway...
Necks_small
Are the Flames the team where Shooting Percentage comes to die?
Lax-xl_small
Flames and Roughnecks
Funny-pictures-chippy-the-attack-gopher-1hv_small
Defensive imbalance

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 51 31 15 5 67
Minnesota 51 25 19 7 57
Calgary 52 24 22 6 54
Colorado 53 26 25 2 54
Edmonton 51 20 26 5 45

(updated 2.4.2012 at 12:36 AM PST)

24 - 22 - 6

Won 1


Certified Executives of the Office of Management

52987_1302804284_tb_small ArikJames

Photo_71_small Hayley

Officiants of the Bureau of Editing

Ryan_small SO_RyanP

Dsc03339_small Mitch Smith

Bureaucrats

E571c235251f6540d35494b73d613163_small Justin Azevedo

Luongo_small DownGoesLuongo

Redfordnewmanbutchcassidy19_small Scott Lepp

Mcinnismonday_small BookoflooB