Flames vs. Avalanche Game Thread
Calgary Flames at Colorado Avalanche, Mar 17, 2010 6:00 PM PDT
The Flames' first line, following a signature effort at the Joe, has fallen off a cliff in terms of performance. I'm at the point, again, where I don't care who Jarome Iginla plays with, as long as it isn't against the top line from the opposition. He and his mates weren't openly terrible against Detroit, but they have to drive the team's offence, and it didn't happen, just like it didn't happen against the Canucks. Iginla and Stajan look particularly inept when the Flames are up a man, which seems like an intractable problem for the Flames this year, just as it was late last year with a different set of personnel and coaches. Iginla doesn't choose who he matches up against, of course, which is a matter I'll reserve comment on until the end of this piece.
Daymond Langkow missed his new running buddy Christopher Higgins last time out, as he, Hagman and Kotalik struggled to keep up with Henrik Zetterberg. Shutting down those sorts of players isn't always a simple thing, so losing a line mate that seems so adept at controlling the puck was always going to be a bother. As well, Ales Kotalik's continued presence on a line that the Flames rely on to play versus good comp is a particular irritant at the moment. If there's any worthwhile evidence in support of his rating that sort of ice time, I'm having a bear of a time finding it. He also has a history performing in another role that requires further discussion in a smidge.
Craig Conroy's play has steadily improved since his return from injury, and he, Nigel Dawes and David Moss were pretty decent against the Wings. Their play would normally fill me with some optimism for better things if there was a bit more season left to play out. Further down the roster, Curtis Glencross' missed penalty shot certainly fit the turning point narrative to a tee, but my greater concern is that he, Mayers, and Nystrom spent about 10 minutes at EV accomplishing nothing. I don't expect bottom sixers to run good players off the road, but if the Flames have any hope of salvaging things, the Flames require the bottom end to out-duel their opposition. It isn't like the top guys are going to.
I thought Jay Bouwmeester, with limited assistance, was pretty good the other night, and Giordano and Sarich didn't look too bad. One thing that is noticeable is that footspeed is a serious concern for Sarich and Staios at the moment. There's no chance that problem gets solved since they aren't going turn back the calendar for those two gents, so that matter is insoluble this year. Sitting Adam Pardy for Steve Staios doesn't strike me as an upgrade, and it will be less so next year. Sigh.
Kipper was solid on Monday, and with his two periods off the other night, I'd suspect he'll go in Denver. He's virtually the only Flame who's season to date has been worthy of elite status. Thank goodness too, because this team's standings spot would be damned sickly had he not operated at Vezina level this year.
The Avalanche, after a brief blip coming out of the Olympics, are right back to their normal regime. That is, being out-shot by a million, scoring a pile anyway, and ending the night in front. They beat St. Louis in that fashion last night, winning 5-3 with Peter Budaj in net. It appears that the voodoo that Colorado working has applies to newcomers as well. Peter Mueller was going nowhere in Phoenix, heading towards the "bust" label at warp speed. Two weeks into his Denver residency has turned him completely, with the Minnesotan tallying 4 goals and 7 assists in 7 games, in stark contrast to the 17 points he managed in 54 games with the Coyotes. You'll also be utterly surprised to note that he's gone from shooting about 4.5% in the desert to 25% with the 'Lanche. Hmm. Craig Anderson, after taking last night off, will start in the nets. He stopped approximately 23 million 48 shots in his last outing against the Stars, where Colorado posted another 5-3 win.
As for tonight, this seems a good spot for a few words about Brent Sutter. I've tried, with declining levels of patience, not to spend every pre-game of late filleting his performance, but he's taken a healthy team with elite goaltending absolutely nowhere. As maimster mentioned in the Detroit post-game, the admittedly good work the club has done in suppressing offence has only permitted the treading of water. Back in the fall, I couldn't imagine that reducing shots against by about 1 a game would result in the team averaging 4 fewer shots for. The passiveness that the Flames show on virtually every night has been maddening, and the line matching choices that we've seen (4th line after an opposition icing), suggest someone not quite in touch with the action on the ice. Sutter has certainly been hamstrung by the presence of a diminishing Jarome Iginla this year, with the team no longer able to count on the regular leaping of tall buildings by number 12. That happens to all sorts of teams, however, and the inability to get Iginla easier match-ups is at the feet of the coach, particularly since Higgins and Langkow paired up to provide a viable hard-minutes duo.
Equally odd is the recent insistence in acting as if Ales Kotalik is a tough-minutes grinder who has no pedigree as a point man on the PP. Kotalik's one extra skill is a plus shot, so not allowing him chances to use it is just another questionable decision in a litany of them. A team that regularly features either Steve Staios or Robyn Regehr on the second PP might be many things, but dangerous likely isn't any of them, and the Flames, with few exceptions, have gone that route all year.
Tonight, then, is quite possibly the last chance to grab some oxygen in a place where that is literally in short supply most days. Colorado, as always, can be had, but the Flames have looked clueless against the Avalanche, and we can complain about bad luck all we might wish, but the Flame forwards, for all the zone time and possession they pile up, never seem to get a clean look at the net against these dudes. If I had to make one tactical request of the team as a whole, a shot-fake to take a Avalanche defender out of position once in a while shouldn't be too much to ask, should it?
Game time is 7 MT. I genuinely hope that by the end of this evening, I'll wish I could have watched instead of waiting for Broken Bells to come on stage at Stubbs. I'm off doing fun stuff all day, so with that in mind, I've posted this early, so if there are any line-up changes, like Higgins being declared fit, please drop them in comments.
340 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hello to all Flames fans
Just introducing myself from MHH. Whatever happens tonight, I think it will be an exciting, close game.
He stopped approximately 23 million48 shots
Fixed. Craig Anderson has certainly kept us in more games than I care to remember.
It's hard to be a saint in this city
Got to hand it to the Avs
The have made the most (and then some) from their opportunities given to them by their goalie. Too bad the resurgence Kipper had this year has been utterly wasted.
Looking at what a disaster this whole Brent Sutter thing is, what was so bad about Mike Keenan anyways? I know he liked to play favorites but was that it? Also, a ton of players on the Flames regressed from last year (iggy, conroy, langkow, moss, bouwmeester, sarich) and very few actually improved (gio, kipper, borque?). Yuck
by M F on Mar 17, 2010 10:37 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
That’s a mighty good question. I think a lot of people blamed him for the Flames’ drop off the face of the planet at the end of last season despite it being more the fault of the injuries than anything else. Keenan Flames hockey was certainly more enjoyable to watch.
Then again, it’s tough to make a direct comparison, because Cammaleri has not been replaced by any player/group of players this year. Whatever people may say about him, he absolutely was an impact forward on a team that has never been rife with them, and I don’t think the 5 mil he got from Mtl was an overpay, all things considered. The Flames started off with Joker instead of Cammaleri, which is like replacing your car with a tricycle, and now they have Kotalik/Higgins (I’m going to designate Stajan as replacement+ for Lombardi), and as good as Higgins has played, he wasn’t doing much aside from driving possession on a line that specialized in driving possession (and little else) until the couple of games prior to his injury.
by SmellOfVictory on Mar 17, 2010 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions
Well tonight could be the beginning of the end or the beginning of maybe something great.
Tonight I will just watch nothing else. Corsi & Scoring Chances can shove it haha.
GO FLAMES GO!!!
I think in a superstitious sense this is what must be done. The Flames will begin their 100% winning streak playing the team that has haunted them all season with their backup in net. They will acquire so much confidence from this win that they will all suddenly begin playing to potential for the rest of the season/post season.
by SmellOfVictory on Mar 17, 2010 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions
I actually think they should call up some the AHL guys – not even the best ones for that matter. Insert Chuckos and Cunnings throughout the line-up.
The, if they beat the Avs with that roster, their increased confidence will grow to such epic proportions that the universe will collapse in on itself and the Flames will be granted the Stanley Cup from that point on, extending forward forever in perpetuity.
by Kent Wilson on Mar 17, 2010 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Oh my god. We will have the new Red Wings
by SmellOfVictory on Mar 17, 2010 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Maybe it’s AVs secret to success this year. Wins + terrible line-up = undefeatable CONFIDENCE.
by Kent Wilson on Mar 17, 2010 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions
So I guess Sutter is completely out of touch. He realizes that a loss tonight will effectively put his team down 5 points with 12 games to go. That’s a 25% swing you have to pull off there, Brent. And especially against Detroit, that is not very likely. It’s almost like he’s treating the playoffs like a forgone conclusion-resting Kipper for the stretch run.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions
Or he’s trying to change things up in the hopes it inspires the rest of the team?
I know we’re all used to working Kipper to death, but three games in four nights usually sees the backup play one, and of the Avs, Canucks and Red Wings, I can tell you which of the three I’d be playing Toskala against too.
I would hope that there would be other things he could do to inspire the team rather then put in Toskala. Hell, I have a bunch of them right here if he needed some.
-Sit Sarich and Staios and move Kotalik down tot he 4th line.
-Go apeshit insane in the room for your pre game talk.
-Double and Triple shift the “good” players (and I’m using that loosely, seeing as the amount of “good” players from the last couple games is equal to 1.)
I could keep going, but it would just be things that everyone already (except, seemingly, for him) knows.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions
No one in their wrong mind would do the things of which you speak.
by SmellOfVictory on Mar 17, 2010 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions
No one in their wrong mind would do the things of which you speak.
If you think really hard of what that means, your brain goes into convulsions. Well, at least mine does. Sounds so simple, yet is so complex. It is a lot like Sutters thought process he used when he determined Toskala was the goalie tonight
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions
I’ll tell you what it means: it means victory for the Flaming C tonight! Do not question why. Do not question how.
by SmellOfVictory on Mar 17, 2010 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions
I’m not entirely convinced double and triple shifting Kipper will make any difference.
Or, well, it wouldn’t if he was actually starting….
I’d like to see Kipper center the Iginla line while Toskala is in net. I think we will finally have the 1st line center with Big Body Presence we need.
by SmellOfVictory on Mar 17, 2010 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Hey, yeah! Kipper can be our Holmstrom!
by Avalain on Mar 17, 2010 4:36 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Great!
That’s all we need.
Hell, you know, why the eff not dismantle the team completely during the last year or so, and then when things don’t go well dismantle it again with 20 games to go.
Sure completely change the defense,
Sure add five new players up front
Sure try to re-invent yourself with little to no time left.
All of this makes perfect sense to me, that’s why the next most obvious thing to do is start a goaltending battle with 14 games to go. That must be what’s going on.
Sheeesh. shoot me now.
I am tasked with chaperoning a bunch of hormonal teachers at a school dance tonight instead of watching the game. Let’s all hope that my night is more painful than those of yours who are watching, and that I return to a plethora of celebratory haikus in the post-game thread :D
I was going to say…hormonal teachers at a dance? Recipe for disaster.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 4:14 PM PDT up reply actions
i was WONDERING….. ;) my guess is that freud would suggest YOU’RE a hormonal teacher. :P also ? i though haikus were reserved for losses…. but i guess we’ll see.
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 4:15 PM PDT up reply actions
Am not yet a teacher, so I avoid Freud on a technicality!
I hope the haikus can be celebratory. I love a good haiku (do these qualify? Hmmm, maybe I just love any haiku), and I, eternal optimist that I am, am also hoping for a win.
Eric Francis a writer i usually disagree with wrote a line today in the Sun that pretty much sums everything.
“Glencross’ missed penalty shot attempt a microcosm of season full of failed opportunities”
I know he just wrote the obvious but it really makes you think back.
Also in today’s Sun the Flames writers discuss the chances of the Flames making the playoffs and it’s not cupcakes and rainbows.
GO FLAMES GO!!!
My prediction for the night:
Calgary 4 (Iggy,Langks,Hagman,Dawes), Colorado 3 (Mueller,Hejduk,Duchenne). Calgary up 4-0 by end 2nd, turtle and almost drop the game in 3rd period, but squeak through.
I will be lauded as a hero when the Flames do win, against all odds/shinpads.
by SmellOfVictory on Mar 17, 2010 5:15 PM PDT up reply actions
Hey Kent, you posted a link on the Nation earlier suggested that Steve Staios was the 7th Least Valuable Player in the league to date. I would ask Dirk over at his place, but there’s a policy on that website where you can’t post comments until you have been a member of their blog for a day (and I just joined). Anyways, when Dirk is doing his analysis, does he use Staios’s season totals with both the Flames and Oilers and compare them with only the Flames players relative totals, or does he use Staios’s totals from both teams and compare them to the relative totals of the two teams. Because if he did the latter, that means we acquired the LVP on the 30th ranked team pretty much (since he has played around 90% of his season with the Oilers so far)! Somehow, he can’t be that bad.
He is that bad. If I had to guess, I would suppose that he took the season’s totals with both teams and compare them with both teams. It wouldn’t make much sense to have his Oilers stats effect the way he was portrayed as a Flame and vice versa. Of course, it doesn’t really matter because he is so bad.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 5:27 PM PDT up reply actions
99% of Staios results would be from Edmonton and, Im guessing, relative to the Oilers.
He’s been that bad in EDM this year. Really.
is it POSSIBLE that staios is actually just the first in a couple of trades with the oil (read: vandermeer) that couldn’t be done due to cap or who-knows-what ? i really have a hard time believing that even darryl sutter (who’s made some questionable deals) could have gone for this one.
unless, this is an ownership deal which i say over at mine.
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 6:06 PM PDT up reply actions
I was just browsing at the qualcomp over @ BTN, and I was surprised by a couple things.
FIrst, Iggy and Bork are in front by a wide margin, at .073 and .070, respectively. The next closest player, at .056, is Reggie. Lanks is .011, which is surprisingly low. Somehow Staios is higher then JBo, at .007 to -.007. Gio is -.076.
This just reinforces my belief that Brent has no idea what he’s doing.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
The rest of the list is here if you want to browse.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 5:43 PM PDT up reply actions
The corsi Qual comp might actually be more accurate.
Conroy
Bourque
Regehr
Langkow
Iginla
Problem is, Sutter hasn’t been hard matching anyone since the failed Jokinen/Iginla thing at the start of the season. It’s been horribly muddled since about the end of Dec.
I’m not really a fan of the whole Qcomp and Qteammates stats since it negatively reflects players who are often put in defensive situations. Someone like Langkow appears like easier opposistion then he really is since his high zone start negatively reflects on his corsi (or +/-).
I think it would be more accuratev to track the Flames Q-Comp by taking a quick peak at the time on ice charts every night to see what players are playing who and then record some numerical value as their QComp (for example, if Langkow played Thorton all night, his Qcomp would be 9/10). That way, if Iggy lined up against Shawn Horcoff, his QComp wouldn’t suffer as badly since we all know Horcoff is a better player then his counting numbers suggest.
that was the dumbest play by 88 on colorado. Going for the change on the dump in
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 6:14 PM PDT reply actions
BORK!
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 6:15 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Kotalik doing his part creating shorthanded goal oppourtunities. Cant say that guy never does what he needs to do to get the boys in position to score
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 6:15 PM PDT reply actions
man the flames are getting molested out there
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 6:20 PM PDT reply actions
For a moment I thought we were playing the colorado michael jacksons. Was the Pepsi centre renamed Neverland Ranch? I dont like to use the word molestation but this first period hits it to a tee
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 6:23 PM PDT up reply actions
Flames playing some Avalanche hockey. Just getting whooped but its 2-0 somehow
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 6:24 PM PDT reply actions
Nyzerman! Woo!
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 6:24 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
If you cant beat your opponent, BE your opponent
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 6:25 PM PDT reply actions
I would rec this if I could.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 6:27 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Dump n Change hockey. Flames just need to keep the Avs pinned in the Flames zone for three periods and rely on our stout goaltending.
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 6:29 PM PDT up reply actions
Fuck yeah Kotalik rubbin out adam foote
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 6:33 PM PDT reply actions
Iggy looks like he is modelling his play like Alex Semin. Perimeter, avoiding corners
A lethal PP threat
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 6:36 PM PDT reply actions
Sounded like they had a good PP. True or False?
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 6:38 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Great power play they almost had a couple chances. Brent is pulling out some of the trademark PP techniques he made up in red deer
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 6:38 PM PDT reply actions
i’m gonna give that one to mayers.
fyi: good thing we traded wilson for leopold to lace his skates up uselessly for 20 games last year.
Flames win the chance count 7-5 in that one. And, for a change, they have the lead for their troubles.
They had more chances? damn I thought they were getting skullfucked
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 6:50 PM PDT up reply actions
wow. turning it around after only ten ? weird….
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 6:53 PM PDT up reply actions
tedious.
i’m starting to find that watching the 09/10 flames is tedious…. i mean, it’s been tedious for a long time but i just figured out what the right word was to describe it.
because it took me three months to figure out the right word ?
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 7:16 PM PDT up reply actions
Holy shit! That’s a PPG!
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions
Oh never mind that was Bork. I like the tactics. Simple GioPhysics- get the puck to the net
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 7:17 PM PDT reply actions
keep em coming !!! there can never be too many gio references
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions
speaking of which: i forgot this in my monday randoms --i was lamenting the loss of the johnson pardy the other night and then sarich took a puck off the foot. i mused about the return of the gio-pardy pairing and my buddy goes “i sure like that alex trebek”
:)
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 7:19 PM PDT up reply actions
actually giophysics suits big hits better. what with seismic/earthquakes and all that
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions
Plus you know he is resorting to GioPhysics to protect his turf. His part of the ice. His GioGraphy
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions
I liked that pairing of WHite and Giordano on the point there. instant Giochemistry
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 7:25 PM PDT up reply actions
i have no doubts he will comply with that request
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 7:24 PM PDT up reply actions
I hope he doesn’t.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 7:24 PM PDT up reply actions
LOL.
i can’t believe you’re in class. what kind of class ???
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 7:26 PM PDT up reply actions
just some history option class its a write off like 10% of the mark is attendance, i am a geology student
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 7:29 PM PDT up reply actions
i think you mean GIOlogy. and if it wasn’t your major ten minutes ago, you should change.
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 7:30 PM PDT up reply actions
well if you ever want gio references i am chock full of them. But i better focus ive been dicking around on this site instead of paying attention
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 7:32 PM PDT up reply actions
I wonder why Toskala sucked so much in TO?
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 7:27 PM PDT up reply actions
How exactly is it not GI when he is kicked by the douche in the crease?
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 7:30 PM PDT up reply actions
A PP goal and a cabable back up, must have had too many green beers!
by Guti on Mar 17, 2010 7:30 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Clearly too many green beer should read capable :)
by Guti on Mar 17, 2010 7:32 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Are we Vancouver in this situation?
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 7:33 PM PDT up reply actions
when our goalie is getting blitzkrieged ? um…. no.
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 7:34 PM PDT up reply actions
I thought you were talking in the 2nd period in Van? 6 minutes left and we were doing the same thing.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions
i wasn’t suggesting i was glad a guy got boarded. clearly i was only glad that SINCE a guy got boarded, it wasn’t an “important” guy. still somewhat cold, yes. but not totally brutal (which is what you suggest).
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 7:41 PM PDT up reply actions
I would rather it be Staios then anyone else.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 7:42 PM PDT up reply actions
Phew! Good thing they didn’t.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 7:41 PM PDT up reply actions
I’m sure we’ll get a couple too.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 7:42 PM PDT up reply actions
LOL. you’re cute when you’re optimistic.
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 7:45 PM PDT up reply actions
I’m optimistic in in anything except sports. They just make me quite angry, as the amount of profanity I use clearly shows.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 7:49 PM PDT up reply actions
Welcome to the site, Fuzzie.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 7:48 PM PDT up reply actions
Im glad we’re winning, but that period was an embarrassment as far as Im concerned. The Flames went up by one and then lost their heads completely. thee Avs went on a 6-2 chance run after the second Bourque goal.
This might be one of the worst Flames teams in recent memory in terms of playing with the lead.
in my monday randoms i likened him to a crystal deoderant rock: totally and completely useless.
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 7:48 PM PDT up reply actions
i have never met anyone who smelled good who used one.
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 7:52 PM PDT up reply actions
I’d never heard of it till you mentioned it.
Lemme guess…some sort of bogus naturopath “alternative”?
yep.
was kindof a big deal about ten years ago. super fad.
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 7:56 PM PDT up reply actions
it was the most useless item i could think of.
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 7:57 PM PDT up reply actions
….ohhhhh i know who you’re talking about…. does he still play for the flames ?
(tildes galore)
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 7:46 PM PDT up reply actions
And that’s why you’re out of a job, MacT. You moron, you do not “ride the hot hand” when you have Miikka fucking Kipprusoff on the bench.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
I’m really glad Toskala has been good so far. But the amount of shots we’re talking about is tiny.
Basically, you’re playing with fire the more you play the guy. His current performance is unsustainable for a very good goalie. For him, it’s completely impossible.
As a starter, he sucks. I think he can be a good backup, as long as he only plays ~15 games.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 7:51 PM PDT up reply actions
i don’t know if i believe that’s a very good judge of a goaltender’s ability. there have been some decent goalies who can’t take the scrutiny in hogtown and crumble. toskala is just one of many.
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 7:59 PM PDT up reply actions
Very good point, sir.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 7:50 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah but why would he bother putting in a solid effort for that franchise. Burke wanted his head before he left anaheim. Just wasn’t meant to be.
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 7:58 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
An aside…Im stunned with how ineffectual Jarome is tonight. I should be used to him being a non-entity every now and then, but this is a team he should be eating for breakfast.
So for you stats guys… what is the true effect of back to back nights? it seems that MSM talk about how teams are vulnerable, but it doesn’t seem to me to be that much of a factor.
Hopefully.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 8:05 PM PDT up reply actions
Hopefully. Avs fans are dicks.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 8:05 PM PDT up reply actions
And that’s too bad. There has been a lot less suckage from him since Gio and him were together
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 8:06 PM PDT up reply actions
people say this alot. i think it has less to do with gio and more to do with him not facing the big guns and playing the hard minutes.
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 8:07 PM PDT up reply actions
Hey, the point of commenting is to talk. I don’t mind it when people triple or quadruple post.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 8:07 PM PDT up reply actions
i prefer “fast typist” but either/or ;)
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 8:11 PM PDT up reply actions
hunh ? i totally don’t twitter unless john shannon is spouting bullshit.
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 8:15 PM PDT up reply actions
how did u do that french e with the thing on top of it
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 8:18 PM PDT up reply actions
what are you agreeing with ? that the flames are just awful ? like, what you said above ?
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 8:08 PM PDT up reply actions
wi has Tedium/Tedious, I have this.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 8:20 PM PDT up reply actions
if my name was ted i would have probably come up with it twelve games ago.
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 8:21 PM PDT up reply actions
is this game still on ? i started watching america’s next top model. i was looking for some excitement. ;)
PP. 645 left. Some guy named Jordano is on the ice.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 8:21 PM PDT up reply actions
better than giordonno. we got that once.
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 8:22 PM PDT up reply actions
We could use Lawrence S for the stretch drive that guy can save anything blindfolded
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 8:26 PM PDT up reply actions
or testing the alt key ?
fyi alt+u then o is how you properly accent sjöström
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 8:28 PM PDT up reply actions
I was holding down the alt key.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 8:28 PM PDT up reply actions
Wow, that’s not right.
“Wow, does Kotalik Suck.”
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 8:27 PM PDT up reply actions
at least we know how to say that in greek
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 8:28 PM PDT up reply actions
I think thats like math-ese theres the greater or equal sign at the end
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 8:29 PM PDT up reply actions
Man Toskala looks like fuckin Dominik Hasek MVP days
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 8:28 PM PDT reply actions
oddly the best trade of the year was for vesa toskala. i’d actually like to see him resigned as a back up if they can get him at a reasonable price.
with the higgins money or the ian white money ?
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 8:30 PM PDT up reply actions
With the “Staios get the fuck out of town” money.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 8:31 PM PDT up reply actions
I can wish.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 8:32 PM PDT up reply actions
<1 million plz.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 8:30 PM PDT up reply actions
I can wish.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 8:32 PM PDT up reply actions
So, we like to make the end of games (and periods) interesting by not getting the g-d puck out of the zone when everyone is pushing up and out of Defensive position.
Whatever you were trying to talk about at niners nation today
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 8:32 PM PDT up reply actions
Bullshit Ferarro, Toskala gets my Rayzers Edge
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 8:30 PM PDT reply actions
Agreed.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 8:31 PM PDT up reply actions
Lookin forward to the postgame on the 4th Line bro
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 8:33 PM PDT up reply actions
yep. i’m a chick who loves hockey, but i’m still a chick. :P
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 8:35 PM PDT up reply actions
That is almost as bad as losing Boyd
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 8:37 PM PDT up reply actions
backlund draws in next if higgy’s still out. no way mcG gets the nod….
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 8:38 PM PDT up reply actions
Dutch postulating the Flames miss Dion’s Boom Boom from the shot
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 8:36 PM PDT reply actions
High and Wide!
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 8:39 PM PDT up reply actions
Dude that is a classic Haiku. Loving the ‘Mickis’ as well
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 17, 2010 8:44 PM PDT up reply actions
I try.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 8:45 PM PDT up reply actions
that’s what he calls himself, so why not !!!
shep explained that mickis is usally a girl’s nickname (like for “mikaela”) but who the eff knows.
;)
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 8:50 PM PDT up reply actions
I was going to put in in Svvveeedish, but I got lazy.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 8:54 PM PDT up reply actions
it would be hilarious to post in swedish.
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 8:59 PM PDT up reply actions
Thanks for the support.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 17, 2010 8:47 PM PDT up reply actions
Anybody see the hit on the Hawks Seebrook . Seems the Hawks are having a badtime with Dmen getting hurt .
Show me the CUP
one down….nine to go.
Wi. start a wins until the Flames make the playoffs clock.
(I actually know I could do this, cause it’s just numbers, but your’s seem more professional)
are you meaning one that’s akin to the sutter(s) dismissal countdown ?
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 9:21 PM PDT up reply actions
but… but…. what if i have to count to like 389 ?
by walkinvisible on Mar 17, 2010 9:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Blog Beef Alert. Looks like some of the ’Lanche fans have a bit of a problem with us, whining that all we care about is CORSI. I would welcome any of them to read our conversations here and they will realize that their season they are enjoying is a huge outlier. BUT THEY HAVE CHARACTER AND SKILL.
The thing that kills me this year and i see the Flames have it also is falling asleep in games that are almost must wins . Take the Wings v Flames the other night both teams should have been playing like it was a game 7 .
But they played like it was nothing . Sure the Flames played the night before but come on when you play the team you need to beat for a playoff spot you find a way . The Wings played like the game didn’t mean much .
That is way i worry if any of our teams get it if it will be the same old same old who cares style of play we both have seen this year
Show me the CUP
Wow that did not come out right > That is why i worry if any of our teams get in it . Will be the same old same old who cares style of play we both have seen this year
Show me the CUP
With you guys, it seems it was more injuries then anything. The Flames don’t have that excuse.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Mar 18, 2010 12:20 AM PDT up reply actions

by 


























