Good, Bad and now Indifferent
The first 10 games were pretty good.
The second 10 were very bad.
The third 10 have been an indifferent set.
Suffice it to say at least 4 of the final five 10 games stretches need to be good, maybe there's room for one indifferent stretch, but it can't be the next stretch.
Schedule analysis after the jump.
When the Flames woke up on October 27 with a 6-3 record, things looked pretty good since one loss was on the road against a very good Detroit squad. With 15 goals in the previous 3 games it looked as though the struggling offence that contributed to early season shut out losses against Florida and Edmonton was fixed and the Flames were ready to roll.
The Flames would go on to lose 10 of the next 12,scoring only one goal in 5 of those losses. Mimimal consolation was earned with the loser point twice in that stretch.
The good news, as previously reported was that the schedule was somewhat weighted to the heavy hitters through 20 and the Flames were halfway through their big Eastern swing.
The past 10 games have done nothing to enlighten us as to whether this team will stay in the hunt or fall out early. A win in Philly, a pair of wins vs the Wild and competitive losses on the road to Pittsburgh, Chicago and LA have showed promise, but the 7-2 Canuck drubbing was depressing. The competive losses are frustrating, just not quite good enough on those nights. A dominant performance in Anaheim - only to see the Ducks move another point ahead of Calgary is equally depressing
As of game 30,or 36.6 % of the schedule, the Flames have played 17 of 36 of their "tougher" games or 47.2 % of that schedule. In the next 7 games before the New Year's eve tilt vs Colorado - the Flames will play zero games against the teams I designated as tough - so this is the time to make a move back up the standings.
At the beginning of the year we projected 96 points as required to make the playoffs, owing to last years 95. This year however, it may take fewer points to do with no one team falling off the back of the bus just yet. It looks to be a logjam for sure with 3 points currently seperating 3 from 12th, so 91 or 92 might do it. Since the lockout, the league average is 92.7; 91.8 in the East and 93.6 in the West, so I will say 93.
To make that target, Calgary will need to play at .635 clip which is alot better than the .450 put in so far, which pretty sounds daunting.
Breaking it down further, with 12 pts in 17 games against Tier one teams (.353), in order to get to the .444 needed against this group, Calgary needs to play .526 hockey from here on out against Vancouver, Colorado, San Jose, Detroit, Chicago, LA, Montreal and Boston.
In the mid range a .500 record so far is short of the .625 needed, so a .656 pace in 16 games is required against St Louis, Nashville, Dallas, Phoenix, Toronto and Carolina.
A win in Anaheim would have been huge, as the Flames now have only 11 points in 9 games vs potential cellar dwellers. This .611 pace stil falls a fair ways short of the .692 required to generate 36 points in 26 games. Consequently the Flames need to play .735 hockey in the 17 games left vs Anaheim, Minnesota, Edmonton, Columbus, Atlanta, Ottawa, Buffalo and the Islanders. 8 of the next 11 games are in this category and that takes us to game 41 and the mid point of the season January 5. If the Flames are not in a playoff position by then, they are not going to be.
| Games | Games to date | Points | |||||
| Detroit | 4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| San Jose | 4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Chicago | 4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Vancouver | 6 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| Colorado | 6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Los Angeles | 4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Pittsburgh | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| NY Rangers | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| Philadelphia | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||
| New Jersey | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Montreal | 2 | ||||||
| Boston | 1 | ||||||
| Washington | 1 | Pts Req | 1 | 0 | Projected PTS | % played | Pace req |
| Total Tough | 36 | 32 | 17 | 12 | 25.4 | 47.2% | 0.526 |
| St Louis | 4 | ||||||
| Nashville | 4 | 1 | 2 | ||||
| Phoenix | 4 | 2 | 0 | ||||
| Dallas | 4 | ||||||
| Toronto | 2 | ||||||
| Carolina | 1 | ||||||
| Tampa | 1 | Pts Req | 1 | 2 | |||
| total Mid Range | 20 | 25 | 4 | 4 | 20 | 20.0% | 0.656 |
| Anaheim | 4 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Minnesota | 6 | 3 | 4 | ||||
| Edmonton | 6 | 3 | 4 | ||||
| Columbus | 4 | 1 | 2 | ||||
| Florida | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| Atlanta | 1 | ||||||
| Ottawa | 2 | ||||||
| Buffalo | 1 | ||||||
| NY Islanders | 1 | Pts Req | |||||
| Total Cellar dwellers | 26 | 36 | 9 | 11 | 31.78 | 34.6% | 0.735 |
| 93 | 77.19 |
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thanks for the info! Becoming more and more pessimistic by the game.
Is it just me or is this site dead? Really like the format, but not a lot of discussion happening.
No, I just think we are all on the same page. There doesn’t really need to be discussion when everyone agrees.
Now, when people disagree, the post count gets up there.
Plus, game threads.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Dec 12, 2010 12:24 AM PST up reply actions
Also, we are a lot smarter then 89% of the people on FN. So there’s that.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Dec 12, 2010 12:32 AM PST up reply actions
I do find that the vast majority of people who have something to contribute at FN are people who also comment here.
by SmellOfVictory on Dec 12, 2010 9:52 PM PST up reply actions
You mean proposing a trade like Bork to LA for a 1st isn’t contribution? Reading comments like that make my head hurt. They just ooze stupidity.
Thankfully, like you say, the ones that actually add to the conversation do stop over here from time to time.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Dec 13, 2010 12:51 AM PST up reply actions
Sorry, I realized that sounds like a personal attack. Wasn’t meant that way.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Dec 13, 2010 12:52 AM PST up reply actions
Indifference...
Exactly how I feel about this team. Just waiting for the eventual late season push to fall just short of a playoff berth.
Like sacrificial virgins, we all burn in different ways. You are a fast explosion and I am the embers.
I think most of them followed Kent over from here – at least that’s the reason I partially transitioned over. I like this site a lot more overall, but it’s nigh impossible to find someone as good with advanced stats as he is (particularly people who are interested in the Flames).
by SmellOfVictory on Dec 13, 2010 9:00 PM PST up reply actions
pessimistic
@dotfras
You can become pessimistic if they are still on a 74 point pace on January 1. For now, lets hope that they make some hay with the easier sched over the next couple of weeks.
This team would need to 180
to get on a prolonged good showing like that. Would something like 5-3-2 average be enough to get them in at this point?
Very close
5-3-2 generates 12 pts per 10 games, times 5 is 60, plus 27 now is 87 with 2 games remaining. Hanging by a thread.

by 

















