Pre-season Primer, Part 1: That hole in the top six ain't gonna fix itself, sunshine.
With training camp in the offing, it seems as good a time as any to have a look at some of the potential story lines for the Flames during the pre-season. First up, a look at some scenarios for filling the hole in the top six left by Mike Cammalleri.
Replacing 39 goals is no easy task for any team, and when a cap-challenged team chooses to use most of its free space on Jay Bouwmeester, the options are circumscribed further. If I had to guess at the Flames' first six forwards, there are five players that seem most likely to be part of the first two lines and they fall into two categories:
Jarome Iginla, Daymond Langkow and Olli Jokinen are locks barring a major trade. Which one of the Flames' first two centers plays with Iginla is a post for another time, but those three guys will almost certainly end up as the team's top three forwards in terms of TOI and points.
The other two gentlemen that showed enough last year to likely rate top-six ice time were Rene Bourque and David Moss. I'd be seriously surprised if the two of them weren't part of the first two lines. Rene Bourque might have had the gods on his side last year in terms of percentages, but he's shown enough other things, both in Calgary and during his injury-riddled tenure in Chicago, that suggest he can be a useful player in a second line role. David Moss didn't ride the percentages at all last year(7.2 EV SH%) and still ended up with 20 goals. They will be hard to dislodge from the top groupings if healthy.
A careful reader might have deduced by this time that I think the Flames are one guy short for the top six ;-) That would be a fair summation, but given the players available, let's look at some of the options for Brent Sutter.
1) Boyd or Dawes?
My two fellow Winnipeggers have been presented an opportunity that has been rare for young Flame forwards since the lockout. Darryl Sutter has brought in help from outside the organization to bolster the scoring lines, whether from the scrap heap (Huselius), free agency (Amonte, Nolan, Bertuzzi) or via a major deal (Tanguay, Cammalleri). This season, Darryl Sutter seems to be willing to let the current members of the organization have a go at winning a job along side his elite players. Of all the potential aspirants, Nigel Dawes and Dustin Boyd, in my opinion, have an edge over the others. Both have proven themselves at the AHL level as PPG-ish scorers, which is likely the line in the sand if you hope to be a top-sixer of any note in the NHL. They've also managed double figure seasons in goals in less than favourable circumstances, and without a lot of help in terms of linemates.
Dawes' 07/08 with the Rangers is of particular interest to me.
GP TOI QC QT Cor. P/60 GF GA +/-
61 11.32 0.01 -0.05 11.1 2.17 33 20 13
He ended the season with 14 goals (11 EV) while playing with less than stellar teamates. His Corsi (4th best amongst regulars) and +/- (team best) were also very good, although he was likely sheltered to a degree in terms of Offensive/Defensive faceoffs. His 08/09 numbers weren't as good, and his finish with Phoenix was poor, but let's face it, if he'd been great, he wouldn't have been a waiver wire pickup. He does have some potential as a project. Like many players before him, his small stature always seems like a strike against him, fair or not.
Boyd doesn't have anything like that sort of NHL season on the resume, but he's a year and a half younger and did score 11 goals last year while playing with the Nystroms and Roys of the world. If he'd been better in terms of EV +/-, I might consider him even with Dawes, but the Flames are almost certainly going to be a team that emphasizes defence first, and that -11 EV he finished with is a poor number irrespective of teammates. Dustin Boyd is a skilled guy, but he's got a ways to go in his own end. Given the experience factor, and the fact that the management has talked him up this summer, I wouldn't be shocked if Nigel Dawes gets a serious look at a scoring role on this team.
2) Why not Glencross?
Not a bad question at all. If a team is going to put its top six forwards on its top two lines, Curtis Glencross should be one of those guys for Calgary. Along with David Moss and Craig Conroy, he was a part of an excellent third line last season, and his addition, along with Bourque, gave the Flames some decent depth until the injury bug overwhelmed the team in March and April. If anyone wants to make the case that Glencross should be in the top group based on merit, it's a valid argument. I just have a suspicion that the Flames don't want a team that resembles its 07/08 edition, i.e. 2 lines and bugger-all else. Glencross, Conroy and one of the Stroms have a chance to be a solid two-way line that can get some traction versus other bottom-sixers. Put Dawes or Boyd in that spot, or both Stroms with Conroy, and things begin to look a bit thin on the last two lines. Curtis Glencross is a very important member of the Calgary Flames, no matter what line he's on. The team just seems more balanced to me if he and Conroy are two-thirds of a good third line, but differing opinions are certainly welcome on this point.
3) Backlund, perhaps?
I'll deal with my expectations for the Flames' most skilled prospect in much more detail later this week, but here's the short form: unless he absolutely, positively kills it in camp, he needs a year in Abbotsford. The AHL is no pushover league. Smoke the grown-ups down there, and then maybe we'll talk about Mikael Backlund as a full time NHLer.
4) Is there a dark horse?
Players like Kyle Greentree, Jason Jaffray, Kris Chucko or Jamie Lundmark could fall under this category. Greentree had 39 goals last season on an offensively challenged QC squad, but he'll be 26 this year and his skating has always been the question mark about him. I also look with a bit of caution at older guys that run up big totals in the AHL, and I'm not alone. Alexandre Giroux scored 60 goals for Hershey last year, had a terrific AHL playoff run culminating in a Calder Cup, and got a 500,000 two way deal from the Caps for all that. Why? 28 years old, is why. He's found his level, and it isn't quite the NHL. That's no sin, but unless any of these gents have another level that they haven't shown yet, they're much more likely to be top-six in Abbotsford than to make the Flames in any role of any sort. I don't see any of the other roster playes on one-way deals being anything but bottom-sixers.
There may be other options that reveal themselves over the course of the next month, or maybe a trade of a defenceman for a forward that shakes things up. Absent that, these appear to be the options at hand, and I'll confess that they don't fill me with a lot of confidence. The best hope is for Dawes or Boyd to break out, because it allows the team to leave Glencross with Conroy, giving the team some stability on the bottom end.
In the next installment, I'll have a look at some of the options for 7th defenceman.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’m definitely with you on the Conroy/GlenX/??? 3rd line, the forward crew feels a lot more competent up and down that way.
I suspect that Dawes is going to get a legit shot in the top 6. I’m not sure that he’s good enough, but I am pretty sure that he’s a better player than Bertuzzi… so we got that going for us, which is nice.
Depth?
Certainly there are opportunities for players to step up, another worth noting is Frederik Sjostrom. However, depth is a problem for the Flames especially if players sent to Abbottsford do not clear waivers. If we lost two players then what? I think the Flames aren’t finished dealing and there could be important additions as other teams also trim their roster, perhaps a waiver grab here and there.
Personally I’d like to see another bonafied winger, even on the level of Heatley. Jokinen is going to be a free-agent after this season, lots of expectations for him, I hope he can live up to it and I’d hate to see over dependence on his line. Injuries could spell doom for the Flames due to a lack of depth. The flip-side is the excitement of seeing prospects step in or Farmhands earning a permanent spot.
Related: I sincerely hope that with the myriad 4th-line-types signed up this offseason, there’s legit competition for those spots, i.e. the org has an open mind about who will be in the Opening Night lineup. I can’t get too jazzed about any given 4th-line trio, but I CAN get jazzed about the idea that the three best performers thru camp/preseason — out of 8 or 9 competitors — get the gig. Depth, in that sense, could be a strength. And the team probably needs it to be one.
(Goddamn, McGrattan getting a one-way deal.)
My biggest fear is that Boyd gets sat in favor of the Prusts or McGrattan’s of the world.
(Goddamn, McGrattan getting a one-way deal.)
Yes and yes. If Dustin Boyd get sat, it’ll be for McGrattan, most likely, and that would be a damned shame. Toughness doesn’t do jack if your tough guys are marginal NHLers on their best nights. Dustin Boyd is a National Hockey League- level player on the merits, with potential to be a useful top nine guy if he can continue to improve in his own end. He needs to play, and he needs a coach that will give him an honest chance. He wasn’t great last year, but I’m not exactly convinced that he got the fairest shake from the organization.
Likewise, if David Van Der Gulik or Jason Jaffray or Kyle Greentree earn a spot, I sincerely hope the fact that McGrattan or Stuart having one way deals doesn’t scupper things. You’re quite right, Matt. The loss of Cammalleri means that the team needs to score a bit more by committee, so they need the best 12 forwards out there. If Derek Boogaard causes a ruckus, I guess I could see having to react to it, but until it happens, run with your best, period.
by Robert Cleave on Sep 7, 2009 10:52 AM PDT up reply actions
Lineup depth
I don’t see Dustin Boyd having a problem being a second line winger, I think he’s secure. We may see Eric Nystrom, Colin Stuart, and Kris Chucko being scooped if they are sent down to the farm. Kyle Greentree should be third line no problems. We are going to lose a couple of players to teams with space in the salary cap. The Sutters are smart, you may see a trade from now till two or three weeks into the season. I think something will happen to free up some cap space. I’d like to see a rookie line with three of either, Backlund, Nemisz, Jaffray, Armstrong, or Chucko. Might as well mix them in. Get rid of some veterans for cap space if you can or let them get scooped and then keep one or two on injured reserve for the start of the season for insurance and depth. (Is that possible?) Rhett Warner sat on injured reserve all of last season.
No way does the organization give up on Nystrom. The guy was clutch late last year. He needs a better look as well as Boyd. We need to Sh#t or get off the pot with Chucko.
Yeah, Nystrom won’t be going anywhere. Colin Stuart getting scooped on waivers would be a boon to the organization. Chucko will start the year on the farm and will have to do something extraordinary to get called up. Even then, I don’t see any teams bothering to claim him on waivers – heck, there’s a dozen viable NHLers still looking for work right now.
There really are no concerns about the 4th line this year. Sutter has a double-fistful of capable 4th liners in the org. The only issue is finding someone to competently play in the top 6. Luckily, there’s more than one candidate for that as well.
Fourth liners O'plenty
Dustin Boyd and Eric Nystrom are in, I would rather see space made on the roster for these two and a third call-up like Nemisz. If our injured reserve is empty then we could lose some depth if players are claimed off waivers-I think its time to look at trading a veteran or two to free up cap-space and to make a little room on the roster for players developed by the system. So the question is realistically do the Flames have a team presently that could reach the cup and win the tarnished bowl? Perhaps we will get lucky and all players sent to Abottsford will clear waivers and our depth will remain. Which veterans are untouchable?
Any trade ideas, a veteran for a first round pick? I don’t envy Darryl Sutter he’s in dire need of breathing room with the Salary Cap-which I also believe is great, it really has evened the playing field for smaller market teams-unless your players are like Heatley and demand a trade-you can assemble a decent roster and not worry that NYR will scoop up all the available talent.
Nemisz
Nemisz will be going back to junior. He is not ready based on what I saw at the Memorial Cup, and he has another year of junior. Nystrom and Glencross are your 3rd line energy guys with Conroy. The 4th line is centred by Boyd if Dawes beats him for the #2 LW There is an outside shot that Jamie Lundmark is #4 at centre. Sjostrom is on the 4th line and is your first penalty killer. Chucko/Prust/ MCGrattan/Jaffray/Stuart/Greentree all fighting for one spot and two reserve positions.
Nemisz has future potential, Backlund now?
Nemisz has excellent stats but is a year away at least then-what about Backlund? Is he ready? My thinking is that we need a suprise in camp to stir things up and earn a spot making it feasible to trade a veteran to gain cap-space. We need young players like Boyd and Nystrom to step up for sure. Lundmark looked good when he played last year, not sure why he hasn’t established himself but he could center the fourth line and third line if Conroy needs a rest. Unless we are Cup bound with our roster its time to trade and deal. I suppose training camp and naming the active roster determines the teams direction ultimately. I have confidence in the Sutters. Anyone keeping an eye on Fleury-has he been invited to a teams training camp?
#1 or #2 only !
If I was running things – the only way Backlund makes the team is as the #1 or #2 centre. If that happens – then either Langkow or Jokinen is expendable, bcause you can’t have $4.5 +m players on the third line. Langkow has a no trade and Sutter will want to give Jokinen some more time to establish himself here so barring an injury don’ t count on it.
Agreed – either Boyd or Dawes must grab the 2nd line winger with Moss, and either Nystrom or Sjostrom must be solid 3rd line 15 goal guys.
Theo in Toronto ? NY ? Philly ?

by 






























