Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: How A Letter From Tom Coughlin Helped One Fan's Recovery

Evaluating the Flames Pre-season


I started the exhibition season off by saying that team-wide results weren't all that important and that the real focus was on individual efforts, especially for those players on the bubble. With that in mind, here are some of my player "grades" based on my own observations over the last couple of weeks.

Star-divide

The Hopefuls

Jason Jaffray - B - Acquitted himself well and could be pushing for the 13th forward position. Saw a lot of ice time, scored a couple of goals and generally held his own. A decent utlity forward, there's no one area of his game that looks either outstanding or weak.

Jamie Lundmark - B - Similar to Jaffray, Lundmark continues to hang around the edges of the Flames roster. Sniped a couple of nice markers and combined to form a nice little unit with Glencross and Fleury during the Oilers game. Lundmark proved useful to Calgary last season when the injuries came down and would probably be a full time NHLer on a club with less depth.

Colin Stuart - C - Stuart made an impression on me in the first pre-season tilt by making one of the most ill-advised cross-ice passes I've ever seen in an NHL game. He had a couple of other gaffes in the same match that convinced me he'd be on the next flight out of town. He's settled down since then and showed some speed and tenacity which would probably be a boon on the 4th line. He, Jaffray and Prust were pretty effective against the Oilers as well.

Mikael Backlund - C - Some very apparent steps forward over his previous training camp couldn't mask the fact that the Flames top rated prospect isn't ready for prime time. Didn't score a point (as far as I can recall) despite some decent line mates, but did manage to create some chances in the offensive zone as well as control the puck at times. Still needs some work in the defensive end, he'll need at least a full year of seasoning in the AHL before he can be a regular at the NHL level.

Anton Stralman - B - A mobile defender with good puck skills, it looks more and more like Stralman will be staying with the big team. Somewhat smaller and weaker on his skates, Stralman will have to improve his boardwork and balance in order to become a regular on the blueline, but the offensive skills are apparent, especially along the offensive blueline.

Staffan Kronwall - C - I didn't see a lot of the big Swede, but the few times I saw him the only impression I got was his foot speed is an issue. At 28, he has a lower ceiling than Stralman and is less likely to be picked up on the waiver wire should he be shuttled to the farm. Look for him to be the veteran on Abbotsford's blueline this year.

Leland Irving - C - Wasn't bad or outstanding during his limited time in net, Irving was certainly better than Keetley and will probably be heading to BC as the assured starter on the farm.

Matt Keetley - D - A disastrous camp for a guy who was looking to bounce back after being usurped by Leland Irving last season, Keetley let in a number of groaners before being shipped to the farm. Didn't even last as long as un-signed camp invitee David Shantz and may be fighting for his job in Abbotsford with same.

The Regulars

Curtis Glencross - A - A bad final game against the Canucks doesn't change the fact that Glencross was lights out for most of camp, leading the team in scoring and frequently being one of the best forwards on the ice. Has speed, grit, smarts, tenacity and even a bit of a scoring touch.

David Moss - A - Missed a chunk of camp due to a minor injury, the games he did play in were all good. Auditioned on the top line against the Canucks and made an impression by holding his own and even scoring a goal. The Bertuzzi is good news for Flames fans, but great news for Moss who quietly excellent all over the ice.

Daymond Langkow - B - Played the roll of emulsifier alongside a rotating carousel of disparate line mates, Langkow didn't get primo minutes at either ES or on the PP, but still managed to be effective most of the time. I stil think he'll end up playing with Iginla at some point this year.

Olli Jokinen - B - Also one of the team leaders in points this pre-season, Jokinen did almost all of his damage with the man advantage which fits with his M/O. Dangerous as anyone down low and coming off the half boards, his lack of savvy in the face-off circle and in the bad end of the rink are still concerns and sometimes led to the Flames top line being hemmed in their own zone. Him and Iginla seemed to work a little better together relative to last season, however.

Nigel Dawes - B - Off and on, Dawes was at times one of the best forwards on the ice for Calgary. When he wasn't, however, he was totally invisible. Fast and willing to go into the corners, Dawes also has a quick release and will probably be a boon to the power play. Playing with Langkow and Bourque, who were his line mates last night, would probably help iron out his consistency issues.

Brandon Prust - B - Ever since I bad-mouthed him in a game thread, Prust has done nothing but impress me. A willing combatant, Prust can also skate, forecheck and handle the puck fairly well. Cemented his spot on the club with a number of solid efforts.

Jarome Iginla - C - Got a couple of PP points, but didn't do much at ES besides rifle a lot of pucks over the net. Still a lot of gliding around in the defensive zone from Jarome and, considering the level of competition he faced for most of the pre-season, he didn't exactly beat anyone up.

Rene Bourque - C - Didn't make much noise until the final game, when he was perhaps one of the more effective Flames at ES against Vancouver. Doesn't look comfortable on the PP yet and may still be trying to get up to game speed after spending much of the summer off of skates.

Craig Conroy - C - Missed most of camp as well, Conroy was quiet aside from winning a lot of face-offs.

Freddy Sjostrom - C - Obviously has some wheels, Sjostrom got an opportunity to play with Iginla and Jokinen for a night, but didn't do much with it. Looks to be a capable utlity forward.

Eric Nystrom - C - Is what he is. Good skating, eager to hit and willing to block shots (and fists) with his face if he has to.

Dustin Boyd - C - Didn't get much of chance to do anything, first being relegated to the Flames all-prospect 'B' squad earlier in pre-season and then spend almost the rest of it nursing a groin pull. Played on the 4th line in the last game and only got about 10 minutes of ice. Looks like Boyd's Job-like trials on this club are going to continue indefinitely.

Brian McGrattan - N/A -  Didn't play and still isn't cleared for contact, McGrattan will likely start the year on IR. His signing looks more and more useless by the day.

Mark Giordano - A - Dispelled all concerns that his job was in jeopardy, Giordano was solidly amongst the Flames best defenders in most of the games he played. Smart, mean and with the unique ability to stick handle out of trouble in tight places, it looks like Gio is penciled into the club's top 4 heading into the regular season. Might end up being the best value contract on the roster this year.

Dion Phaneuf - B -Started the camp out by running around the ice like a chicken with it's head cut off, Dion gradually began to settle down and ended the pre-season with what may be his best game in a long time. Still has all the tools, just has to continue to think the game at the same manic pace he tries to play it at all the time. 

Jay Bouwmeester - B - Struggled during his first couple of contests, which included a number of ill-advised pinches. Managed to showcase his silky smooth skating and good own zone positioning alongside Robyn Regehr, Bouwmeester looked more comfortable by the end of camp. Was fairly dangerous in the offensive zone as well.

Robyn Regehr - B - Solid as a rock, as usual.

Cory Sarich - C - Struggled visibly to keep up in the first pre-season game, Sarich missed the end of the exhibition period due to some unknown ailment. Will need to return and put together some strong outings in order not to lose his spot outright. He may become trade bait sooner rather than later.

Adam Pardy - D - Was a liability during the first few games and managed to take a lot of penalties over the course of the pre-season to boot. Pardy settled down as the things progressed and is no doubt considered Calgary's #6 defender for now. Still, he'll have to progress in order to keep the likes of Stralman et al at bay.

Miikka Kiprusoff - C - Dreadful in his first outing and mediocre in his second, Kipper allowed at least one stinker per start but was also brilliant at times against the Canucks last night. If he could cut back on pucks sneaking through him once a game, he'd be a lot closer to the goalie we once knew. Unfortunately, that was also true last year...

Curtis McElhinney - C - Didn't get much action and didn't wow anyone when he was in net. Got stronger in the first match against Vancouver, but still allowed a couple of pucks to slide underneath him (albeit, they were shots by the Canucks most dangerous player).

The Flames as a team did a couple of things well during training camp: they scored a bunch on the power play and they also drew more penalties than they took. The bottom end of the roster was rarely a liability which is always a bonus. Who knows if that will continue into the regular season, but the trends are there.

On the other hand, the goaltending on the whole was mediocre and the team didn't score all that much at ES. The number one line was a concern when it wasn't on the PP, which is disconcerting for me personally - having more than $12M locked up in two players who are played to even at ES is a bad investment. Either the Jokinen/Iginla pairing will have to start consistently outplaying their opponents 5on5, or Brent will have to find a new combination that can do damage without giving it all back at the other end.

Comment 26 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good grading

These are really how it played out and for most of these players their performance in the preseason wasn’t really assuring, lets hope we get off to a good start on Thursday and never look back.

Home of the NHL's Best Defense.

by CofRed on Sep 27, 2009 10:43 PM PDT reply actions  

Soooo...

Where are the roster numbers at, and when will they be down to 23?

"It's a great day for hockey" - BBJ

by jealous broadcaster on Sep 27, 2009 10:54 PM PDT reply actions  

After Shantz was sent down, they have 2 G, 8 D, and 16 F. They need to be down before the first game, so I guess no later than after Wednesday’s practice. They might keep all the D in town for a short period, since Sarich may or may not be nicked. If they go with 23, they’ll need to run off two forwards this week.

by Robert Cleave on Sep 28, 2009 4:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, not sure why the team would send down just Shantz, but they have a couple more gusy they need to cut. They make keep an extra forward is McGrattan starts the year on IR though.

by Kent Wilson on Sep 28, 2009 5:08 AM PDT reply actions  

I guess they could run with 21 if they think both of Sarich and McGrattan are only hurt in the very short term. Good catch on McGrattan, I’d forgotten about him. I hope he doesn’t get enough chances to reach his goal.

by Robert Cleave on Sep 28, 2009 5:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

"I can’t wait," McGrattan says, "for the first guy who runs one of these guys.

"That will give me the green light to go get ’em."

The ultimate enforcer myth: that they exact retribution for supposed ills. It almost never happens that way because – guess what!? – guys never choose to drop the gloves with them (aside from other goons).

I think the game that changed my perspective on this issue forever was one against Dallas a couple of years ago. Eric Godard was dressed and Steve Ott was absolutely running amok. He was all over Jarome any chance he got, face-washing him after whistles and cross-checking him in the back during scrums. Not only was Ott obviously not deterred, Godard was never able to catch Ott and convince him to drop the gloves (I think they were on the ice once together and Ott laughed at him).

That was about it for me. I’d watched Eric Godard be useless all season in terms of actually playing hockey, but here was some snide turd running around delivering cheap shots to the Flames best player every chance he got and our supposed enforcer was impotent to do anything about it.

by Kent Wilson on Sep 28, 2009 6:02 AM PDT reply actions  

I realized the issue became settled for me when, although I like rough/tough hockey, I’d get up and refill the water glass whenever two ‘enforcers’ started fighting.

by maimster on Sep 28, 2009 7:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

Toss out the two games staffed by Abbotsford, and the (mostly) NHL Flames won two games and tied three. Not bad for a team learning a new system.

by Resolute on Sep 28, 2009 9:53 AM PDT reply actions  

I have a question

Brian McGrattan – N/A – Didn’t play and still isn’t cleared for contact, McGrattan will likely start the year on IR. His signing looks more and more useless by the day.

How can you get more useless than “COMPLETELY”?

by brisulph on Sep 28, 2009 12:17 PM PDT reply actions  

How can you get more useless than "COMPLETELY"?

You’re very wise.

by Robert Cleave on Sep 28, 2009 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

hey hey hey…. cut the guy some slack: maybe he’s a good presence in the press box…. or maybe he makes a mean tuna sandwich.

by walkinvisible on Sep 28, 2009 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

stuart, jaffray, lundmark on waivers.

so we’re down to 2g, 8d, 13f . thats 23 guys, wich also is the limit.

25-21-12
15-22-17
20-24-11
23-16-33
28-4
3-5
6-7 //kronwall & strålman

34
mcelhinney

i would waive kronwall.

by shep_ on Sep 28, 2009 12:31 PM PDT reply actions  

interesting.

If sarich is injured then kronwall must stay.
or is something else coming?

by shep_ on Sep 28, 2009 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

they won’t waive kronwall because of the leopold fiasco last season. the more available nhl-ready defenders the better…. same reason i don’t see any heat-level defensemen getting dealt in the near future (though i definitely see darryl easing up the logjam by trading any of pelech, negrin, kronwall, erixon, brodie, palin etc.etc.etc. before next summer).

not aulie, imo.

by walkinvisible on Sep 28, 2009 12:44 PM PDT reply actions  

If Sarich was healthy, Kronwall would be on waivers, IMO.

Here’s the link to the waiver info shep_ referenced.

by Robert Cleave on Sep 28, 2009 12:55 PM PDT reply actions  

i would totally agree with this estimation…. no team would carry 8 defenders unless (at least) one’s injured.

by walkinvisible on Sep 28, 2009 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

According to the fan 960 Kronwall was placed on waivers with the other 3.

Not sure which news source is correct, but it does make more sense that they would send down Kronwall as well (assuming the Sarich injury is not serious).

by chw on Sep 28, 2009 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’ve been away on Vacation, and I came back today to Fleury being cut, retiring and am just catching up. I must say, that I was slightly disappointed in seeing Fleury cut, especially with a 4pt, +4 and shootout winner. However, I quickly realized that was just old memories talking and know that this is a good outcome. I am happy with his performance and it was a nice story while it lasted.

Now to the grades. I missed almost all the game-feeds to watch and am just going off the highlights and numbers, so I could be way off base, but I think the C-Kipper, C-McL, and C-Irving is slightly unfair. I would grade as this:

C+: Kiprusoff – As he did get better each game and finished with a .910 sv%. The “one-soft goal per game” comments are perplexing because there is an inherent contradiction with shot-quality in that. If shot-quality fails to really exist, then every goal is bad, or at least unfavorable, (which is what a goalie will tell you) and a one-goal game is pretty damn good -especially vs. 36 shots. I don’t think a C+ is particularily impressive btw, as I expect an “A” performance from the goaltender whho plays…be it who it may.

C- : McL – I’m still waiting for him to even be a .900 sv% backup. I am becoming more firmly confident that this will be Curtis’s last year in the NHL. I want to like the guy, but a goalie who is always with an “L” beside his name is hard to like. The keeper’s may not win the games (it’s a valid argument) but they can lose them.

B: Irving. He didn’t play much, but he only allowed two goals on 25 shots, correct? = .920%. Everything in pre-season is small sample size, which applies to all the grades, but at least the kid gave a reason to be optimistic within this sample size. I see little reason to be more confident in McElhinney than Irving to be honest. I’m not opposed to giving Curtis the green light over Leland this year, because it’ll be good for both of them, but if Irving takes a step forward in Abbotsford and Curtis doesn’t in Calgary, the switch of the two demands to be made.

I still think that Goaltending depth is not a point of confidence with this team. But, then again….has it really ever been with the Flames?

Vancouver’s Luongo, Schneider, Raycroft is open to being the butt of many jokes, but it looks just great to me, as Raycroft today could be Conklin from the 05/06 years ago. sigh.

D for 3 and now goal for 21 years, of course I'm a goaltender apologist.

by LawrenceS on Sep 28, 2009 1:39 PM PDT reply actions  

Nice write-up Kent

My two cents, Keetley needs to go…he can take McBackup with him as well.

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Sep 28, 2009 2:11 PM PDT reply actions  

Good job Kent.
I never got to see any games (I live in Singapore and they are not yet on Centre Ice) but I listened to a couple. I am a little leery of this line-up. They certainly didn’t blow the doors off any competition. I know it is preseason but the last game against the Canucks we iced our NHL ready lines against a lot of AHL players and still lost. Let’s hope the preseason will have no bearing on actual results!

by 44stampede on Sep 28, 2009 8:18 PM PDT reply actions  

dude !!! i watched em on justin.tv or you can catch em on atdhe.com

by walkinvisible on Sep 28, 2009 9:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Goaltending ...

Is anyone on here concerned that the Flames have never made a concerted effort to address the obvious weak link back between the pipes? No one really established themselves in the ps … I agree with LawrenceS on the whole situation. Still scratching my head as to why Sutter signed McElbackup after last season ….
I’m a Calgarian living here in SJ (FYI: the media-darling Sharks are overrated) … Nabokov is not what he used to be, quickness is eroding. Sound familiar?

by Calgarian in SJ on Sep 29, 2009 2:38 AM PDT reply actions  

I consider goaltending to be the Flames biggest question mark, personally. I think it was Calgary’s most glaring weakness last season and nothing has happened to change my mind in the meantime.

by Kent Wilson on Sep 29, 2009 5:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Calgary Flames.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Funny-pictures-chippy-the-attack-gopher-1hv_small
20 wins required
Necks_small
Dave Shoalts says ridiculous stuff about goaltending
Needles_small
New Team, for me anyway...
Necks_small
Are the Flames the team where Shooting Percentage comes to die?
Lax-xl_small
Flames and Roughnecks
Funny-pictures-chippy-the-attack-gopher-1hv_small
Defensive imbalance

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 51 31 15 5 67
Minnesota 51 25 19 7 57
Colorado 53 26 25 2 54
Calgary 51 23 22 6 52
Edmonton 51 20 26 5 45

(updated 2.3.2012 at 6:29 AM PST)

24 - 22 - 6

Won 1


Certified Executives of the Office of Management

52987_1302804284_tb_small ArikJames

Photo_71_small Hayley

Officiants of the Bureau of Editing

Ryan_small SO_RyanP

Dsc03339_small Mitch Smith

Bureaucrats

E571c235251f6540d35494b73d613163_small Justin Azevedo

Luongo_small DownGoesLuongo

Redfordnewmanbutchcassidy19_small Scott Lepp

Mcinnismonday_small BookoflooB