Pre-season Post-mortem: Half a game
Last night's relatively easy encounter with Florida might have left people with a surfeit of good feelings towards the Flames, relative to the actual achievement. Tonight's shoot-out loss to the Canucks was a sharp reminder that not everything will come easily, and it should serve as a useful reality check, even if it was just a practice game. Getting your head handed to you for the first 30 minutes and the last 10 will have that effect.
The first half of tonight's proceedings brought back some memories of recent Flames' ineptitude against Vancouver, with the Canucks gaining an early 3-0 lead against token resistance. The opening goal was caused in large part by a poor change and a poor Jay Bouwmeester read, leading to a Kyle Wellwood breakaway. A penalty shot ensued, with Wellwood making short work of it to give the Canucks the lead. Curtis McElhinney struggled early on, allowing a shaky five-hole counter to Daniel Sedin. By the midway mark of the second, it was 3-0 and I mentioned to Kent in the game thread it reminded me of last year's season opening 6-0 game, not only in score but in tone.
Pre-season games are never quite as tight as their regular season counterparts, of course, with every team trying new combinations and looking at different players, some of whom might not play in an actual NHL game any time soon. Possibly because of that inevitable disjointedness, tonight's game took a turn, really out of nowhere. The Flames never seemed to dominate play at any length, and Cory Schneider never gave up a bad goal and yet the Flames ended the second period only down a goal, and took the lead in the third. Curtis Glencross and Brandon Prust were part of the effort to get back even, and Prust acquitted himself well, with two very good passes to set up goals by Lundmark and Bouwmeester.
Unfortunately, as so often happens against the Canucks, the denouement centered around the work of a Sedin. The Canucks overcame a disallowed goal and a neutral zone face-off to score at the death, with Daniel Sedin making Cory Sarich look a bit foolish. Sedin then closed the books with the shoot-out winner.
Result aside, it shouldn't be forgotten that these are still nights largely meant for players to get the attention of the management and coaches. Curtis McElhinney, after a slow opening frame, played better as the game progressed, and he wasn't really at fault for the last two goals against. The 3-0 goal by Raymond had the whiff of goaltender interference about it, and the tying goal by Sedin was a scramble situation and a good bit of business by the Swede, who showed admirable patience with the clock winding down.
There weren't many other Flames of note. Nigel Dawes and Olli Jokinen both struggled early on, with Jokinen being rested, or benched, however you choose to view things, for much of the second frame. The two did combine on the PP goal that gave the Flames a 4-3 lead. Jay Bouwmeester was +2 with a goal, and really only gets partial blame for hauling down Wellwood on the penalty shot play, because of the poor change.
Mikael Backlund had a difficult night. His shoot-out fumbling was unfortunate, but beyond that he only played 8 minutes, and looks like he's ready to head to the Fraser Valley for some remedial work. There's no shame in not being ready at this point, and playing center every night will work in his favour down the line.
The other player of interest in training camp, Theoren Fleury, was not much better, to be frank. He made a good play taking a hit to start the sequence leading to Bouwmeester's goal, but he saw some ice time vs. the Sedins tonight, and he was found as wanting as one might expect. He wasn't alone in being second best when the twins are on the ice, but he can't quite keep up. Tonight was a much more rigorous test than what Fleury had faced in his first two games, so the good times were likely always to be tempered. He got only a few seconds of PP time, which might lead one to believe that the die might be cast at this point, at least. There's no point in giving significant PP time to a guy headed for the AHL, and being realistic, that's the next stop for Theoren Fleury.
The Flames play in Edmonton on Wednesday night. The roster should be down to a manageable size by that point, and it might be time to work on defensive coverage, because the Flames aren't there quite yet in their own zone. The opportunities for the fringe players should end after tonight. Time to cull the herd. If there's more than about 28 guys left by the time they play the Oilers, that will be too many.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't have the benefit of making it to the Dome for these games.
I’m only listening to the feed on the Fan 960 and reading the box scores. What’s the deal with Backlund? Is he being somewhat effective or do his numbers speak the truth? Looks like Abbotsford?
Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.
By my eye, Backlund has taken a few steps forward relative to where he was last year. That said, he isn’t doing enough consistently to stay on the team and there’s occasions where he looks overmatched, especially in his own end still.
As predicted, he belongs on the farm. I think he’ll put up some numbers there though.
In the end, neither team put out much more than a half game’s worth of effort, and the 4-4 tie is indicative of that. I expect both coaches will have reminded their teams that half efforts give their opponents free points.
and those free points are the only reason why the canucks won the division last year :P
seriously, they had a little article about this in the recent THN Yearbook, showing how the standings would have changed if there wasn’t a free point for making it to overtime. it’s quite interesting.
http://canuckpuckbunny.blogspot.com
GO CANUCKS GO!
ahhh a Canucks fan...
…reminding us of the Flames meltdown last season. Much appreciated. :)
Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.
The Oilers run to the finals in 05-06 is the prime example of how the league rewarding failure can pay off. Go back to the old 2-0-1 point system with no shootout, and Vancouver finishes 8th that year with Edmonton 9th.
I hate the idea of rewarding failure, which is what both the OTL and the shootout are. That said, knowing that the shootout isn’t going anywhere, I would just as soon go to a straight win-loss format. If the league is going to argue that a shootout win is a real win, then have the stones to argue a shootout loss is a real loss.
Meh…it is what it is, you know? Have good shootout players on your team.
Edmonton last year had as many shootout chances it seemed last year, and didn’t win the shootout.
Missed the playoffs too.
Great synopsis of the game. Nice to see it through another’s eyes.
The Sedins do seem to like playing the Flames, that is for sure.
They have been flying all preseason though.
I was wondering, watching from afar…is it down to Fleury vs Backlund for like that 3-4 line energy guy?
Fluery was more noticeable in this game…taking that hit to make the pass was a vintage Theo play.
I hope he does well, just as a fellow old fellow…
vancitydan
Rookies stepping up
With the salary cap looming over-head needed is a couple of rookies or developing players to step in. Without that talent, you have all the money going to your first line and four defencemen. After that you have third and fourth line players and no second line. Hard to compete in the league that way. Exceptional rookies have to figure in the line-up to up the talent level without busting the salary-cap. Lundmark is earning a regular spot, and David Shantz is a good choice for back-up goalie-other than that hope for some call-ups from Abbottsford during the season to earn a spot. We have top heavy salaries on one line, and no rookies clearly ready to step up.

by 



























