Musings of Interest: Anton Stralman
One of the "throw-in" guys in the Primeau swap, Stralman is actually a fairly interesting player - one who might make life interesting for any number of Calgary defenders on the big club's perimeter. The 23 year old already has 88 NHL games under his belt and has put up points in some good leagues this far in his career.
Stralman was a 7th round pick by the Maple Leafs back in 2005. The next year, he made the leap to the Swedish Elite League as a teenager, managing 9 points in 45 games. He stayed in Sweden for one more season, this time garnering more ice and better results:
Stralman played for Sweden in the 2005 and 2006 world junior championships before graduating to the Swedish Elite League and national team this season. He scored 10 goals and 11 assists in 53 games for Timra IK of the Swedish Elite League, earned a first team all-star berth, and was named one of the top three players for his country at the world championships last week in Moscow.
Those are some nice results for a youngster in high level surroundings.
From there, Stralman made the leap directly to the NHL, playing in 50 games and scoring 9 points. He was completely sheltered during his rookie season, averaging less than 13 minutes of ice per game, which isn't terribly unusal for really young, inexperienced defenders. It's notable that Stralman was prefered over the much older Staffan Kronwall who was also on the Leafs at the time - Kronwall appeared in just 18 games for Toronto that year.
This past season, the Leafs added Jeff Finger, Luke Schenn, Mike Van Ryn and 28 year old rookie Jonas Frogren. Stralman was pushed down the depth chart a bit as a result and only saw 38 games in the show. Nevertheless, his ES and PP ice time climbed a tad to 12:13 and 2:38 respectively. On the farm, Stralman tied for the highest scoring defenseman on the Marlies (with...Staffan Kronwall!) in terms of goals with 7, despite only playing in 36 games.
Stralman's advanced stats from last season are limited in their power given the small sample of games, but worth looking at anyways:
QofC: -0.05 (2nd easiest amongst defensemen)
QofT: 0.00 (middling)
corsi: +6.6 (best amongst defensemen, tied with Kaberle)
ESP/60: 0.94 (best)
GA/60: 2.69 (3rd best)
Some encouraging numbers for a 22 year old. His circumstances look similar to Frogren (who put up mostly inferior rates) at behindthenet, but the truth is the older and bigger player was deployed in less offense rich situations, including 19 more defensive zone than offensive zone draws. Stralman was the opposite - he got the Phaneuf/Giordano treatment with 49 more face-offs at the good end of the ice.
The immediate future for Stralman is murky, at best. The word on Stralman is he has good offensive abilities and instincts, but is still something of a liability in his own end of the ice. He's probably a step ahead of guys like Palin and Pelech due to his 88 games of NHL experience, but he's clearly behind a guy like Mark Giordano who is older, more tested and put up better advanced stats at ES last season. Adam Pardy is probably also ahead of Stralman on the Flams depth chart, although the latter might be the superior prospect owing to their relative difference in age, past results, potential ceilings, etc. Their difference in styles and the fact that Stralman's abilities are already replicated on the roster by guys like Gio and Dion Phaneuf may also swing the coaching staff's preference in favor of Pardy.
Although he may be waiver eligible according to capgeek, Stralman is also behind the aforementioned Kronwall owing to Staffan's one-way NHL contract. That said, I can't see the team balking at sending Kronwall's 500k to the farm should Stralman prove to be the superior player. Either way, the organization risks losing one (or both) of these guys to the waiver wire should the club start shuttling them between the farm and parent teams this season. That will no doubt make for a competitive pre-season between the two as well as an intricate dance when the year gets going and the first injury comes down the pipe.
0 recs |
13 comments
|
Comments
Just a general thank you...
…for these Musings of Interest. They were my favorite item last summer, when I first discovered FHF and once again you really help shed light on the large mass of “who are those guys” that make up a large portion of the Flames roster.
I’m really curious if Sutter’s end game in gathering so many potential 6th D is to give him flexibility in trading Sarich for potential top 6 forward sooner rather than later.
Defensive Depth Rant
Recall 2004 when unknowns Ference, Montador, and Commodore were forced into key playoff action due to injuries on the back-end. While the call-ups all made names for themselves and are established players in the show now, it was a healthier, fresher Tampa club that claimed hockey’s greatest prize.
Since the ’04 Sutter has always placed a premium on depth on defense. Defensive insurance, essentially.
The only downside of the glut of D-men that I can see is that of the development of Pelech, Negrin, Aulie & Co. (and even Erixson once he crosses the pond) as minutes with the big club and even in Abbotsford will be more scarce for the next few years due the volume of competent defenders.
Keep in mind each player in the Flames projected top 7 NHL D-men (assuming Kronwall’s 1-way gets him the 7th spot for the sake of this argument) is under contract for this year and next year.
Not great news if your name is TJ, or Keith (Aulie or Seabrook, I suppose). Think of Kevin Lalande who was lost in the Flames system last year before jumping up the ladder with the Blue Jackets.
Certainly this is an organizational position of strength from which Sutter can move assets from – to address other needs (read: scoring). I imagine one of Phaneuf or Sarich will be moved once the organization is comfy with a youngster is ready to make the jump. No room for underwhelming veteran play especially vets with big price tags.
That being said, I’m still not sure why the club felt the need to add Erixson rather than a forward where the club is lacking young prospects. Perhaps he was simply the safest bet/best player available.
Rant Over.
"It's a great day for hockey" - BBJ
by jealous broadcaster on Aug 8, 2009 5:21 PM PDT reply actions
Interesting how little respect Giordano gets in the comments to that thread. I guess that’s a good thing, I think he’s under-appreciated.
It’s similar in Flames circles. Take a gander at Calgarypuck and you’ll see threads suggesting that Stralman makes Gio redundant.
I’d go check out calgarypuck, but then I’d have to do that eyebleach thing again, and it hurt a lot last time.
gio is totally underrated. you have to really see the guy live to understand how good he actually is —off the puck (and therefore off the tv screen), he makes some really sound decisions pretty much all the time. if he gets further shafted in calgary (which would not surprise me in the least), he will end up in the middle pairing somewhere else and will end up being one of those guys that never “happened” in calgary, and who will excel elsewhere (read: hull, st. louis, savard, giguere --though realistically not THAT good). i think lombardi may be a good example here.
by walkinvisible on Aug 9, 2009 5:12 PM PDT up reply actions
im a bit worried about the tanguay to minnesota rumours. signing both havlat and tanguay in one summer = goooood.
potential lineup would look something like
tanguay-koivu-havlat
miettinen-bouchard-nolan
brunette-belanger-clutterbuck
sheppard-brodziak-boogard/gillies/weller
johnsson-schultz
zanon-burns
zidlicky-hnidy
bäckström
harding
pretty good… :-/

by 


























