Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Eternal Unpredictability of the 2011-12 Boston Celtics

Flames season review - the players (part 2)


 

I had a fear heading into this season that the Flames would lack high value contracts (ie; outperformers). I saw the raises to Kiprusoff, Regehr and Phaneuf, as well as the departure of Huselius, and lamented. 

That fear, it seems, was overblown. Or perhaps, misdirected: the team did manage to get solid, above value contributions from many of the guys mentioned in the previous post, as well as Mark Giordano and Rene Bourque. Mike Cammalleri, whom I would argue was probably superior to Jarome Iginla this year, also belongs in this category.

With that in mind, I think the club suffered the inverse problem it went through last season, where the roster was almost a total black hole beyond the top end of the rotation. This season, the org's biggest underachievers were arguably it's biggest money players (resulting in a lot of inefficient investment of cap dollars):

No need to get into Mikka Kiprusoff here, I think. His issues have been well documented at this point. Aside from a run in February and his curiously decent PK SV%, Kipper was probably one of the club's primary chink in the armor. Price - $5.83M

Ditto Jarome Iginla, who by decline or by circumstance had one of his worst seasons in years. While none of his results were alarmingly below average (like Kipper), Iginla was the Flames version of the $5 shake: still quite good, but probably overpriced for what you get. Price - $7M

Daymond Langkow falls into this category for me, although to some degree unfairly -  Mr. consistent had a long year of babysitting the sore thumb and played the final quarter of the season with a buggered-up hand. He did manage the best corsi rate of any of the top 6 forwards (+14.4), so I don't think we have too much to worry about with Langkow going forward (assuming his hand heals and Bert isn't re-signed, of course.) Price - $4.5M

Dion Phaneuf fell well short of delivering on his big new contract, albeit apparently due to chronic injury concerns. His output rates at both ES and PP were the worst of his career thus far and he was also on the ice for the most goals against in the entire NHL this season. Now, that obviously has to do with his large amount of ice time, but it's not like he was seeing the big guns like, say, Bouwmeester or Chara (or Reggie). Also, playing in front of Kiprusoff obviously didn't help things. Price - $6.5M

Todd Bertuzzi (aka: sore thumb) wasn't a big money guy (thank god) but he was deployed by Keenan as if he was. Bert averaged 18 minutes a night during the regular season, including a full 4 minutes with the man advantage (only Iginla and Jokinen were in the same realm in terms of forwards). He played with some of the best players on the team, often against lesser lights, and he put up mediocre or worse results: 1.64 ESP/60, +5.9 corsi, 3.14 GAON/60. It will be addition by subtraction once Bertuzzi goes, because it's a good bet his minutes will be soaked up by a far more capable player (*cough* Moss *cough*) when he's gone. Price - $1.9M

Olli Jokinen wasn't around for the full season, but the Flames did bear a significant cost for acquiring his dollars at the deadline (resulting in the injury/cap fiasco to end the season). Jokinen burst out of the gates as a Flame and then stepped into an elevator shaft: he went goalless in his final 13 games and the PP fell into a pit of despair after his acquisition. He was also a minus player. 

His advanced stats are sullied by his days in Phoenix, so they can't necessarily be taken as truly indicative of his performance as a Flame. That said, they speak poorly of him: marginal ES production (1.84 ESP/60) plus a negative corsi rating (-3) aren't comensurate with his cap dollars, or what the club gave up to acquire him (Lombardi, Prust and a first round draft pick). Price (this season) - $1.129M, $5.3M (going forward).

All told, the Flames had three forwards in their top 6 that produced less than 2 ESP/60 (which I consider the a sort of "cut-off" point for forwards at the top of the rotation): Bertuzzi, Langkow and Jokinen. If not for Bourque's step forward and "touch of god" run of bounces (PDO = 103.9), I shudder to think how much worse the Flames top end could have been.

In addition, only Mike Cammalleri performed at a level that justified his special teams ice time (5.97 PPP/60): of the other regulars, only Iginla managed greater than 4 points/60 minutes of ice on the man advantage. To put the numbers in perspective, guys like Alex Semin, Pavel Datsyuk and Bobby Ryan scored more than 7 PPP/60 this year. Getzlaf, Thornton and Frolov were all above 6.

Basically, besides perhaps Cammalleri, none of the Flames players who were paid or played like elite players performed at an elite level this season. Some were pretty good (Iginla), some were merely average (Phaneuf, Langkow) while others were poor to abysmal (Bertuzzi, Kiprusoff). Total price of the parts listed = $24.959M.

Calgary's biggest weaknesses this season was it's defense (GA), it's special teams (more accurately, the PP) and it's inability to perform consistently against the stronger clubs in the league. I'd say all three deficiencies fall sqarely at the feet of the big money boys and is what kept the Flames firmly below the league's upper echelon.  

This issue will obviously be of vital importance to the club going forward and one I plan to address in the Sutter portion of my season review (upcoming...).

Comment 10 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

More high cost guys

Good summary Kent – pretty clearly matches what we could all see.

I was wondering about your leaving a couple of other high-price guys out of the discussion. Using Cammalleri and his $3.6M as a cutoff for “players who were paid as elite players”, we also have Reggie, Aucoin and (almost) Sarich above this line. And of these three, I’d say you got one who played to his contract (Reggie) and two more who didn’t (although more in the Langkow group than the Kipper group). A very poor batting average on big money contracts…

In fact, quite frankly (and I’d have to go look at other rosters to confirm) but this seems like a lot of guys paid at a pretty high level. OK, I will look…Boston, for example, had 6 players at more than $3.5M (one of whom was Marco Sturm!), San Jose had 5 (all numbers from nhlnumbers.com). I may have to take some evening to do a chart showing typical salary distributions among teams, see if there is any correlation of salary distribution to success.

by maimster on May 8, 2009 9:19 AM PDT reply actions  

I might have to dispute that Sarich didn’t give value on his contract. BehindTheNet shows him in a 3 way tie with Aucoin and Giordano for second in terms of opponents faced, but among the 3 he had the worst teammates. His Corsi/60 is +10.9 which is below Aucoin’s +13.3. However he was on the ice for almost a full goal per hour less than Aucoin – yikes. I certainly saw Sarich good this season too.

by R O on May 8, 2009 10:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

Part of the reason I excluded those guys is there contributions were arguable either way. I mean, Sarich had a good underlying year, but he played against a lot of nobodies. Is that worth $3M+? Im not sure.

by Kent Wilson on May 8, 2009 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

Echoing Kent – I’m torn on Sarich. For the most part, I do think he is valuable and I don’t find myself cursing at the screen very much on his behalf. The question is not only whether he is worth $3M+ this year, but for the next three years still. I know that’s not the specific question addressed here, but it factors into my thinking about his worth. I probably fall into the middle – he was worth his contract this year (or at least close), but I worry that won’t be the case in 2011.

by maimster on May 8, 2009 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

I wonder when we’ll see Sarich where he likely belongs, as part of the second pairing at evens. He didn’t click last year with Regher, and he got shuttled to the third group this year because he and Phaneuf both play the right side. If Phaneuf doesn’t go to the first pair at some point in the near future, as in next season, you almost have to move the guy. They’re wasting him on the third pair at 3.6 million a year otherwise. I suspect he’d be very effective in that 3-4 slot, but the way the Flames are set up has left that as a matter of conjecture.

by Robert Cleave on May 8, 2009 5:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good plan, I would like to see that.

by Kent Wilson on May 8, 2009 9:41 AM PDT reply actions  

Maimster’s more than welcome to do a full takeout on this, but I took a look at the number of cap hits at or above Cammalleri’s 3.35 million on the playoff rosters at seasons end:

ANA – 2F, 3D, 1G
BOS – 4F, 2D, 1G
CAR – 4F, 1D, 0G
CGY – 4F, 4D, 1G
CHI – 3F, 2D, 2G
CLB – 3F, 1D, 0G
DET – 2F, 3D, 0G
MTL – 5F, 3D, 0G
NJD – 4F, 1D, 1G
NYR – 3F, 3D, 1G
PHI – 5F, 4D, 1G
PIT – 5F, 2D, 1G
SJS – 3F, 2D, 1G
STL – 4F, 4D, 0G
VAN – 4F, 4D, 1G
WAS – 4F, 2D, 1G

There are a few notes to add. Philadelphia’s total includes Rathje and Hatcher, and St. Louis’ includes Erik Johnson.

Of teams that actually had every one available, the Flames were tied with Vancouver for the most players, at 9.

The Canucks and Flames were the only teams that had four more or less healthy bodies on defence commanding that sort of contract. Vancouver’s 4 guys (Bieksa, Ohlund, Salo, Mitchell) made 14.25 million. Calgary’s made 18.1 million. Not exactly a lot of bang for the buck there.

ANA, BOS, CHI (X2), PIT, VAN and WAS are still alive with at least 1 goaltender making that much money, but only 3 of those 7 (Khabibulin, Luongo, Fleury) are actually playing. I wonder if GMs will take note.

How losers deploy their resources holds no interest for me, so I didn’t look at the non-playoff teams.

by Robert Cleave on May 8, 2009 6:24 PM PDT reply actions  

Completely off-topic, but did the Flames convince Backlund to go to Kelowna after the Worlds, or was that his call? Either way, it earned them a WHL title and a shot at the Memorial Cup, ironically against the Flames-owned Hitmen.

SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there)

by Doogie2K on May 9, 2009 10:08 PM PDT reply actions  

I think it was a mutual thing. Backlund didn’t like his treatment in Sweden and the Flames didn’t like how his development was going. Good to see him get back on track here in North America (even if it cost the Hitmen the title).

by Kent Wilson on May 10, 2009 9:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t know, man, it seemed like the Hitmen cost the Hitmen the title. The game 2 third period meltdown was eerily similar to the meltdowns in the Flames’ games 1 and 2.

by R O on May 10, 2009 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Calgary Flames.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Dsc03339_small
Sven, Sven, Sven Baertschi
Small
Roman Cervenka's Contract Structure and Why He's Worth Every Penny
Small
Erixon and Schultz.. The two bastards
Small
Go Flames

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

37 - 29 - 16

Won 2


Certified Executives of the Office of Management

Photo_71_small Hayley

Officiants of the Bureau of Editing

E571c235251f6540d35494b73d613163_small Justin Azevedo

Ryan_small SO_RyanP

Dsc03339_small Mitch Smith

Bureaucrats

Luongo_small DownGoesLuongo

Redfordnewmanbutchcassidy19_small Scott Lepp

Mcinnismonday_small BookoflooB

381858_721102932987_120603131_37270080_1092957201_n_small LaToya12