In defense of Curtis McElhinney

During my Score liveblog, I spent a lot of time warding off comments by people lining up to toss the rookie goaltender under the bus - "loser", "can't win", "Kipper wodda had that!" was the common refrain.
I take extreme issue with the emerging fan-sensus that McElhinney isn't an NHL caliber goaltender. I'm certainly not saying he is - the truth of the matter is we don't have any idea if he can indeed play at this level. For a couple of reasons:
1.) Not enough information
Also known as "small sample size". McElhinney has started 5 whole games this season. FIVE. I personally don't feel comfortable evaluating an NHL hockey player (especially a goalie) after a single season, let alone the equivalent of a week and a half worth of work. In my opinion, a good number of starts to really get a feel for a 'tender's floor and ceiling is about 100. That's a hell of a lot more than five. The guy plays every other month for Chrissakes.
Because McElhinney hasn't won yet in his career, the emerging perception is that he'll never win - as in, there must be something about him causing the inevitable defeat. Meaning, while there isn't a lot of information, the data we do have all points in one direction, which is leading to the torches and pitchforks. But, like flipping a coin 5 times and getting all "heads", there simply isn't enough info to make any decisions here. Chance can have a significant effect on outcomes and perceptions when the sample size is so small; imagine, for instance, deciding what kind of goalie Kiprusoff was after his first 5 games of the year.
To illustrate, here are the stats from the each Calgary tender's last 4 starts. Guess who is who:
Goalie #1
SV% - 0.824, 0.920, 0.846, 0.897 = 0.872 average
Goalie #2
SV% - 0.750, 0.972, 0.880, 0.737 = 0.835 average
The difference being, this is almost the entire body of one guys work and just a miniscule slice of the other's.
2.) Bad information
Or, in stats terms, "non-representative sample". Here are CuMac's 5 opponents this year:
CBJ, DET, COL, ANA, CAR
- Of the five games, three (DET, COL, CAR) were on the second night of a b2b (anathema to the Flames this year for whatever reason). The Flames were visitiors in 4 of those contests as well (CBJ, DET, COL, CAR).
- Over those five games, the Flames averaged 33 shots against, but just 29 for (-4 SD. Calgary's overall average this season is 31.8 SF, 30 SA for a +1.8 SD).
- Calgary's skaters managed just 8 GF in those 5 games, or a putrid 1.6 goals/game. Yuck.
As you can see, McElhinney has been dealt shit cards so far: rare starts, bad circumstances and zero offensive support. Besides my stastistical objections, the fact that he's thrust into the most difficult position in sports at the highest level in the world once every 5 weeks or so is also a recipe for FAIL - any hockey player will tell you that practicing isn't enough to keep you game ready.
So give the kid a break. He may or may not be a viable NHL goalie and it'll take a lot more information before we can come to any sort of conclusion about him. The only things we know right now is: he was an AHL all-star at 24 years old and he's been screwed over in the NHL thus far.
0 recs |
5 comments
|
Comments
Thank you for making this post, I think its extremely unfair to judge the kid at this point. I will admit it doesnt seem Mcelhinny seems to be a world beater or anything when you consider how some goalies careers began but I do think hes at worst a very good back up. My fear is that with all of these other goalies in the sytem all it will take is a very good preseason by Keetley and Mcelhinny is gone; ultimately I see him going to another team where he will grow fluorish and develop into a pretty good goalie. I cant explain why but the team plays soooo poorly in front of the guy. Im sorry I dont care how tired u are you should never lose such a one sided battle to Carolina EVER!!! Mcelhinny let in a few softies in the game, when the game was already out of reach and the team showed no signs of life or caring to try and make a come back. I feel bad for Cumac because he really shows signs up making incredible saves and such but ultimately is overwhelmed when the team refuses to play in front of him; DEFENSIVE COVERAGE try it. They seem to have less of a focus when Mc is in net as opposed to Kips and it should be the oppostie.
For the record Kipper is goalie 2 right? Im thinking it because he played soo poorly against Atlanta and really was the reason they lost, that and Leopolds terrible own goal; a 73.7% Sv wouldnt be surprising.
I specifically remember the Colorado game, the first 15 minutes or so he stood on his head, with a ridiculous amount of shots, a lot in tight. I remember thinking how we were lucky to have a decent backup who could play that well with almost no action the previous month. Then the dam broke, the rest of the team continued to play terrible and he started letting in goals, one or two of which weren’t great. Really hard to judge him from that game, though; with any decent effort up front and I think he’d been fine.
That game is pretty much a metaphor for his entire season…
Great post!
It’s about time for somebody wrote this… props to Kent.
Calling McElhinney a bust would be like proclaiming Olli Jokinen would get 6 each game as a Flame after watching his first period in Philadelphia.
"It's a great day for hockey" - BBJ
by jealous broadcaster on Mar 9, 2009 2:12 PM PDT reply actions

by 




















