Flames/Preds Post Game: Sometimes, the bear eats you...
Well, there are games that just don't work out, and this afternoon Calgary was on the wrong end of one where they might have deserved better. The Flames were pretty decent after the 12 minute mark of the first, really. If you check the scoring chances, Nashville got 6 of the first 7, and Calgary was solid from there, but this afternoon was a rare occasion where Miikka Kiprusoff didn't quite play up to his standard. After what I wrote about his play in the pre-game, I can only conclude that I jinxed him;-)
Because of the way that Barry Trotz organizes his forwards, this was an opportunity for Jarome Iginla to work against third line types like Ward and Smithson, and he took advantage of the rare chance, scoring two goals and having the lion's share of possession when he was out there. In contrast, the Langkow line didn't have it's usual snap, running at a collective -8 at EV. Ouch. Jay Bouwmeester and Mark Giordano went down the hole with them as well, even though they had a day in the black in terms of Corsi.
As I said, there just those days where it doesn't come together, and Kipper had one of those days. He whiffed on the Erat goal, and the others were mostly the residue of a few bounces going the wrong way, but most games this year, he makes an extra stop or two. Since the Flames would be in the ditch without his play this year, there's no point in getting too broken up about it until it becomes a habit.
I'm never happy watching a loss, but the Preds are living through one of those runs where everything is going in at the moment, with the Cody Franson game winner serving as Exhibit A. The fact that Calgary couldn't halt that roll is unfortunate, but I'm a lot happier with the overall level of play, even if the outcome isn't ideal. They've played worse and won more than a few times this season, so l'll just chalk this one up to "shit happens", and move on.
0 recs |
14 comments
|
Comments
It seems like the Borque/Langkow line had a really rough day today. Borque -4 and Langkow -3 (not to mention Bouwmeester at -3 as well). That’s very unsusual for those guys to get that many scored against their line. And about Kipper, he was bound to have an “off” game one of these times, and today seemed to be that time. That’s not to say he played terribly, but its very unusual to see him allow 4 goals on only 19 shots these days. I was impressed with what I saw from the Flames for the most part, its just a shame they couldn’t quite get over the hump in late going of the third period and bury one of those good chances they had.
The minuses themselves seem a bit un-earned even if the Lanks unit looked decidedly un-dominant. One minus was the NSH second goal which came exactly 1 second after Moss’ penalty expired, and another minus was the empty netter. The fourth NSH goal was also just a bad bounce. I don’t stare too close at the bad bounces, the noise evens out eventually. But two minuses on the afternoon came on decidedly non-even-strength situations.
In a fairer world the Lanks unit would have earned its goals against in more standard fashion (i.e. actually at even strength).
The first goal was a bit of a cluster, so -1 would have been a pretty good reflection, IMO, although Phaneuf was a bit lax on that play as well. I think the fairest way to describe their work would to be say they weren’t what we’ve become accustomed to, and acknowledge that more nights than not, they aren’t a problem.
by Robert Cleave on Dec 19, 2009 11:26 PM PST up reply actions
Yeah yesterdays game was a tough loss big time. Would have the flames won had bouques unit had been better? I don’t know? Just like does R O go by richard or Dick? I don’t know? Or if RO were to wildly beat his chest at a bloggers roundtable featuring Robert Cleave and Kent Wilson, would they giggle? I don’t know?
by M F on Dec 20, 2009 3:19 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Was I drinking at the time of that comment Mr. Wilson? I don’t know? Am I the man? Yes.
by M F on Dec 20, 2009 7:23 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
So much for all those games in hand.
Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.
I think they miss a healthy Sarich more than we might think. He was obviously poor when he played, but if he’s healthy, he’s a solid 17-20 minute option against decent comp. Without him, they’ve used Johnson 10-11 minutes a game, and I think that the Flames aren’t really built to run 1/2 a d-man short. Bouwmeester in particular doesn’t look like he has the same legs that he showed earlier on. If they snap back with the light schedule over the next week, we might just chalk some of this up to the grind. It happens, and with the lousy schedule that most Western Conference teams have this year, I wonder if we won’t see some strange swings.
Oh, and I watched The U on Saturday. Terrific documentary, and the Luther Campbell stuff made me laugh. “No, I would never do that.”
by Robert Cleave on Dec 21, 2009 8:51 AM PST up reply actions
I don’t know. The Flames issues in my mind aren’t defensive – they’re moving the puck forward consistently (plus, you know…that terrible PP). The insertion of Sarich might take some of the load off of Bouwmeester, but I don’t think it helps the Flames progress in terms of their lackluster possession game and ti does little to nothing to advance their offensive weaknesses. Calgary is one of the worst teams in the league in terms of generating shots on net currently and the lack of a legitimate first line option becomes more glaring with each passing game.
Given what we saw in October and some of November (and now all of December) the Flames are sinking to where they probably belong in the standings. I can’t imagine a healthy Sarich moving the needle very far.
I don’t know many good teams that can propser with 5 1/2 D over the long run, but I’d be about the last person to dismiss the need for another, or different forwards. I’m just seeing some coverage issues creep into the Flames’ work down low that aren’t just because of the forwards, and I think they’d be better with another legit body playing full minutes. I think there’s some energy conservation going on by a couple of the D in order for them to manage their minutes.
If that’s not so, a healthy Sarich should be moved if the difference between him and Johnson isn’t really that significant, and if the Flames can manage to acquire a top six forward for Sarich, that’s a no-brainer.
by Robert Cleave on Dec 22, 2009 9:40 AM PST up reply actions
Just noticed an excellent writer wilting away with people like TLP and Ross Creek at Flames Nation: Jean Lefebvre. Any way to get him at this blog?
by Ken Williams on Dec 22, 2009 7:48 AM PST via mobile reply actions
Just noticed an excellent writer wilting away with people like TLP and Ross Creek at Flames Nation: Jean Lefebvre. Any way to get him at this blog?
by Ken Williams on Dec 22, 2009 7:48 AM PST via mobile reply actions

by 




















