Take The Money And Run: G13, Flames @ Stars Post-Game
The puck and player were both in the neutral zone. Let's get that straight right now, it was a BS call.
And the game was fu-ugly. The scoring chance count is shocking - check it out yourself but prepare to lose your lunch.
But as the adage goes, "we'll take the two points". Because if we're not getting points in these games while the forwards get their biznaz together, then we're hooped.
Breakdown:
First:
EV Shots On Goal: 4-6
EV Shots Toward Net: 7-11
EV Faceoff Starts: 2-2
Second:
EV Shots On Goal: 8-11
EV Shots Toward Net: 18-18
EV Faceoff Starts: 6-3
Third:
EV Shots On Goal: 4-10
EV Shots Toward Net: 14-16
EV Faceoff Starts: 2-4
OT:
EV Shots On Goal: 0-0
EV Shots Toward Net: 0-0
EV Faceoff Starts: 1-0
Overall:
EV Shots On Goal: 16-27
EV Shots Toward Net: 39-45
EV Faceoff Starts: 11-9
In the practice prior to last night Sutter was trying some wacky line combos involving Iginla and Jokinen. Looking at the Dallas roster and from prior experience, I figured Richards would be their primary difference maker, so the game would probably be won and lost in the matchup vs. Richards.
And that was almost how it turned out (but for the late-minute heroics of one Daymond Langkow). Early on Richards was playing mostly against Iginla's unit (although Iggy got double-shifted away from that gig a few times) with smatterings against Glencross and then Langkow. In the third I noticed a shift towards Langkow and Bourque's unit. I haven't checked the shift charts but that's how it shook out in my mind. And the results were disastrous. Not a single unit looked like they mustered any traction against Richards (who was +6 Corsi and +1 for the night). Yikes.
Iginla had an alright game. He had a fine hit against Robidas (granted the dude is a dwarf) and the first goal he scored was fantastic. Also just a lovely shift in the third where he took the puck from behind the Calgary net and safely moved it to behind the Dallas net, where some pressure ensued. Granted that must have been against lesser opposition. Still, he ended up 3-9 in EV chances and made a few bad decisions in his own zone. But he looked willing to battle, perhaps for the first time all season.
Jokinen... ugh. What else is there to say?
Regehr and Bouwmeester had fine games:
- Bouwmeester is so patient defensively, his stick checks perfectly timed. And his defensive awareness is uncanny - on the Eriksson goal, he switched from chasing Richards to covering the pass 2-on-1 style the moment he realized that Eriksson was uncovered. Eyes in the back of his head, that one.
- Regehr did what he does best in the defensive zone - muscle players out of the play. He was a force, esp. on the PK where he prevented sure bang-bang plays with sheer strength.
And McElhinney. What a night for him. He still has stylistic aspects to his game that just scare the shit out of me (ill-placed rebounds, awkward save recovery) but tonight he was full value and then some. The penalty shot save, all of the saves on the PK, and a couple in-tight chances that he just played safe by closing the five-hole. Huge win for young Curtis, even though (once again) the team didn't give him nearly enough support.
On the subject of McElhinney: the nickname "BackElhinney" popped up in last night's thread. A fine nickname, but I prefer the CP creation "McElWinney" myself.
The delay-of-game penalty was clearly a missed call. The Stars did have several instances of non-called interference - which kind of evens things out, but kind of doesn't really - 4-on-3's have much higher scoring rates iirc. We caught a break folks.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Curtis was good, very very good, last night. In fact, I think that he should go again tonight unless Kipper is feeling 90%+. He earned it. I will say, however, one win doesn’t make you a great backup goalie, so the kid has to keep it going. I saw many of the same things as RO, especially in the first, but it didn’t strike me as being too nerve-wracking. McL looked like a goalie trying to overcome his nerves with composure (which worked for the most part. He still has a strike against him in my books about untimely goals. I’m sure Curtis feels this too, and any goal is untimely, but the two last night were not reflective of his otherwise excellent performance. He called the bluff on the first and got worked, and the second was just one of those….well, now the game is over backbreakers. Again, not so much to ‘blame’ ….anyway, we got the win and he did play very well.
Iggy…yeah he looked better. Lanks.. the guys who have been there before. There was a whole slew of guys along for the ride IMO (Dawes, Boyd, Nystrom…etc.) Jokinen looks batter and better to me almost each and every game, but in the sense that getting hit by a car is better than falling out of an airplane.
So, Sutter. Give the kid another go. At some point he has to prove that Leland doesn’t deserve his spot next year and this game was a step in that direction.
.926 ev sv%….pretty sharp.
Can’t we ever be happy about a win haha :) no the Stars should have never got that many shots and CuMac was in the zone last night and if Kipper is anything but 100% give him another start and save Kips for Saturday night. Iggy looked like pre 08/09 Iginla last night he was a monster, Jokinen looked much better and Bourque just like Iginla very strong on the puck and was playing like he has all year.
As for the game the penalty kill keeps getting better that’s three straight games without allowing a goal but we have to be more disciplined in our own end, 36 hits last night by the Flames and Iginla led the charge with 5 of those, and that delay of game penalty in OT I personally thought if someone shot in to the crowd without it the puck being tipped was always a penalty no matter where it goes out well I’ll take it.
Where the Lead is never safe, Ahead or Behind.
Great game by the kid. Don’t expect to see the penalty kill be so effective tonight though, St. Louis is pretty dangerous on the power play.
I loved what I saw from Regehr, Iginla, Bourque, and Langkow. I want to see Prust and the ‘Stroms back together, however. A strong 4th line that you don’t have to worry about is a nice thing. Also good to see Pardy back in the line up, I much prefer him over Johnson.
As a side note, Stralman looks to be getting better and better. Maybe the flames should’ve dumped Kronwall instead?
apparently the blues are gonna try out the kid line: berglund with new call-up eller & recently healed from his appendectomy oshie. they could cause some trouble, and could provide some opportunity.
in other news, i expect a mcgrattan start cause someone should be earmarked to pummel cam janssen for the prust-jaw incident last year.

by 


























