Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Madonna Promises No Wardrobe Malfunctions

Flames @ Ducks Gamethread

Calgary Flames at Anaheim Ducks, Nov 23, 2009 7:00 PM PST



It's been a tough go for the Ducks. Doesn't mean the Flames can take them lightly though. Anaheim has one hell of a first line with Getzlaf and Perry and Calgary hasn't won in Anaheim since...well I can't remember.

Stuff to watch for:

- With Iginla and Jokinen having perhaps their best single game together this season LA, I'm guessing Sutter will match them against Getzlaf's trio (which is how Carlyle has been doing things this year anyways). Even with Iginla's turn around in full effect, that's not a match-up that fills me with confidence.

- Jamie Lundmark filled in well enough on the wing with the aforementioned big guns. Imagine, then, what another legitimate top 6 forward could mean for this club.

- McGrattan versus George "porn-stache" Parros this evening. Who wins? Who cares?

- With Iginla likely facing the big boys all night, perhaps guys like Langkow, Dawes, Moss, Glencross and Boyd will be able to feast on the Ducks rather dreadful forward depth.

- SNET showed a Brent Sutter interview where he praised the work of Mark Giordano, who's scoring chances and corsi numbers have gone through the roof since he moved to the third pairing.

- Kipper in net tonight. Flames will face the suddenly ineffectual JS Giguere. There was a time that would have been bad news, but no longer.

Let's get it on.

Comment 391 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Hey they had the lines including Sjostrom…. are they full of Shit?

I saw them:
1-Dawes-Lanks-Moss
2-Lundmark-Olli-Iggy
3-Prustrom2
4-GlenX-Connie-Boyd

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 6:58 PM PST reply actions  

With two quick goals? I’ve washed the Chicago game from my memory, but likely so.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 7:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Shots : Toronto 61 (!!!!), NYI 21

Score: NYI 4 TOR 3

LoLeafs.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 6:59 PM PST reply actions  

Holy crap….that’s the kinda shots the flames need.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 7:01 PM PST up reply actions  

wow. eerie in hindsight, hey ?
 ;)

by walkinvisible on Nov 23, 2009 10:52 PM PST up reply actions  

It’s almost getting eerie in TOR. I mean…really? Almost makes you believe in curses.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 7:03 PM PST up reply actions  

LOL. is it eerie that i wrote eerie right before the comment where you did ? i meant it in the way that the flames got 43 shots (aka the kind they need)…

by walkinvisible on Nov 23, 2009 10:53 PM PST up reply actions  

sitting 14 rows up in the corner, attacking zone 1st and 3rd. lots of flames fans here as always,although duck fans are as loud as any I’ve heard. a guy with a Phaneuf jersey, just in front of me, so I guess i’ll have try not to watch Phaneuf so as not to get pissed and say something bad!

good to see a couple selanne jet’s jerseys in the crowd…

by maimster on Nov 23, 2009 7:01 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

How did Nick Boynton move himself up onto a pairing with Niedermayer?

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 7:10 PM PST reply actions  

Hmm…over/under on how many shots the Flames get this period? I say 5.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 7:13 PM PST reply actions  

i’ll take the over

by maimster on Nov 23, 2009 7:17 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

that didn’t take long, probably it for the night

by maimster on Nov 23, 2009 7:14 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

The power vs power match-up is not what we want.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 7:14 PM PST reply actions  

No. Lundmark already looks like he’s messing his shorts.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 7:15 PM PST up reply actions  

never a good sign when it looks like your on the pk 5on5

by Jeshko on Nov 23, 2009 7:16 PM PST reply actions  

Not sure what Iginla was thinking on that play close to the net.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 7:17 PM PST reply actions  

Yeah, both not enough possession and what they do have is of low quality.

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 7:18 PM PST reply actions  

A lot more movement on the PP tonight.

Jokinen blew that play at the side of the net though.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 7:23 PM PST reply actions  

I think Sarich took the Getzlaf shot off the face.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 7:25 PM PST reply actions  

Sarich take a puck in the face or something?

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 7:25 PM PST reply actions  

flames playing well, moving their feet. ducks are truly a one line team

by maimster on Nov 23, 2009 7:27 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

But that’s a pretty frakkin’ good line.

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 7:28 PM PST up reply actions  

 Right in the ear hole, by the looks of it.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 7:27 PM PST reply actions  

Hell of play by Pardy, and drew the penalty to boot.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 7:28 PM PST reply actions  

nice play by reggie

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 7:29 PM PST reply actions  

post for the mosser

by maimster on Nov 23, 2009 7:30 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Mice recovery by Jokinen on that give-away there.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 7:31 PM PST reply actions  

the 2nd unit looked a lot better on the pp

by Jeshko on Nov 23, 2009 7:32 PM PST reply actions  

Disagree on this by the way. Moss looks real good down low on the PP but I’d prefer the other two spots be from the 45-21-12 line

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 7:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Ah, that’s a nice break, and a good snipe.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 7:32 PM PST reply actions  

Why don’t they use him more in the shootout?

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 7:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Because Iginla who’s like 2 for 100 on shootout, has to be slotted in there somewhere.

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 7:34 PM PST up reply actions  

well, this glenX theory obviously doesn’t hold water anymore.

by walkinvisible on Nov 23, 2009 10:55 PM PST up reply actions  

They don’t use Sjostrom either and IIRC he’s pretty good at it too.

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 7:35 PM PST up reply actions  

they prefer guys who haven’t scored in 80 games

by Jeshko on Nov 23, 2009 7:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Nice pass, Jamie. Wrong team and all, but nice pass. Ouch.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 7:38 PM PST reply actions  

wow, was that ever terrible

by Jeshko on Nov 23, 2009 7:38 PM PST reply actions  

I can’t fathom what Lundmark is thinking there.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 7:39 PM PST reply actions  

that’s all panic

by Jeshko on Nov 23, 2009 7:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh Jaime, when your trying to stay in the NHL you don’t do shit like that.

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 7:39 PM PST reply actions  

agreed

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 7:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Let’s see now if they can avoid the typical post-goal meltdown…

by SarahM on Nov 23, 2009 7:39 PM PST reply actions  

haha, spoke too soon.

As expected, that match-up is bad, bad news for the Flames.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 7:40 PM PST up reply actions  

This line is a disaster against Getzlaf’s line.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 7:40 PM PST reply actions  

Seriously!! WTF is up with letting two goals within a minute. This has to be a joke.

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 7:40 PM PST reply actions  

is that 4 games in a row?

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 7:41 PM PST up reply actions  

More like two seasons in a row. Or is it just my imagination cause I remember it alot last year.

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 7:47 PM PST up reply actions  

ANA has 6 chances this period and I think all of them were by the Perry line against Iginla.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 7:41 PM PST reply actions  

Holy crap… that it just brutal. Lundmark with a stupid play, and then he’s out again…and the Flames crumble again. This sh*t does not happen this consistently to other teams.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 7:43 PM PST reply actions  

Because other good teams’ top lines don’t lose their shit in their own zone all the time, Lawrence.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 7:44 PM PST up reply actions  

“top lines”.

Nice shot differential, but that’s mostly the PP’s. Getzlaf et al. drank Iginla’s milkshake in that period.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 7:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, that should have been in quotation marks.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 7:47 PM PST up reply actions  

only 4 shots on pp. big territorial edge to flames (other than first line)

by maimster on Nov 23, 2009 7:56 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

For sure, the ice tilted away when Getzlef et al are not on the ice. They haven’t generate too many chances off of possession yet, but it will come.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 7:57 PM PST up reply actions  

So why put the worst defensive line out twice in a row. It can’t be coaching can it? Keenan did the same thing, so are f*cking Smegal and Iron Mike equally dumb.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 7:47 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree, Lawrence. I don’t understand matching those two lines. There’s absolutely no chance that works out for the Flames. I can’t understand that strategy at all.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 7:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Nor do I understand backing them with Regehr/Phaneuf.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 7:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Regehr is steady there, he’s got his man on the 2nd goal and is generally good. Phaneuf coudln’t take his man on the half-wall but that’s not a great place to commit for a D anyway, so no blame to him.

It’s the F’s, Kent, to a man. And Jokinen is leading the charge (off the cliff).

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 7:51 PM PST up reply actions  

I really miss the old Mighty Ducks uniforms and logo.

It’s not the Honda Center…it’s the Pond!!

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 7:44 PM PST reply actions  

find that hard to believe, but probably depends on your methodology.

by maimster on Nov 23, 2009 7:59 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

The Perry unit has had all sorts of close-in looks.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 8:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Iginla unit vs. Getzlaf unit is a shitkicking. Thank the Lord the Ducks have no depth because that’s the only way we are going to beat them by the looks of it.

And Iginla has played the least worst here I think. He at least has picked up his man. On that 2nd goal, Jokinen can’t decide whether he’s a centre or winger, and he ends up taking nobody.

And Lundmark shows his stripes against real first line comp. I bet the CP/sports talk radio crowd couldn’t stuff it in their pants quickly enough.

I think it’s time, Brent Sutter. Time for the organization to swallow its pride, and put Jokinen permanently on the third line (or lower).

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 7:47 PM PST reply actions  

Wow. Harsh. But well put and quite valid.

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 7:49 PM PST up reply actions  

That also means that Darryl Sutter has to do something about the lack of genuine top 6 forwards on this club. I mean, look at the hole that an injury to 1.4M Rene Bourque creates in this team.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 7:50 PM PST up reply actions  

I don’t know how you’re blaming Jokinen on those goals. Jokinen to me, was one of the best forwards out there. He made a good heads up pass on the glenX goal. You can’t defend the Lundmark flop…and he’s out again not blocking a shot. Iggy was playing centre on the second goal and Joker is covering the RD.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 7:50 PM PST up reply actions  

I don’t know if that’s by decision that Joker is covering the point or if he’s covering for Iginla being out of position, but Joker can’t cover two men…

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 7:52 PM PST up reply actions  

If anything it looks like Lundmark was out of position, he’s the deepest of the three F’s by the looks of it. So I suppose Jokinen could have been covering for him. Either way though, it was a terrible sequence for the two of them. That’s a low% play by Jokinen, he has so much space to cover to get to Boynton and his best bet is to block.

And I’m not apologizing for Iggy much either, he’s the least worst, far cry from good.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 7:55 PM PST up reply actions  

I’m not making a comment about Iggy, I just think putting that fiasco on Jokinen is brutal. I’m not saying he was Ovechkin, but I wouldn’t blame him at all for those goals. If I’m on the bench Lundmark sits/plays 4th line for the 2nd and is told if he doesn’t get his shit together he’s not coming up again. That is unacceptable.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 7:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Maybe I’m stupid or ignorant…but why was Lundmark playing with Joker and Iginla in the first place?

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 8:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Because the wing depth on the this team is frankly rather shabby.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:02 PM PST up reply actions  

yeah but Moss couldn’t do the trick?

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 8:03 PM PST up reply actions  

The error is playing Lundmark against good comp to begin with. Iggy and Joker have enough problems of their own, and would likely struggle against Getzlaf-Perry under ideal circumstances.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 8:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Re: Jokinen’s pass – that was all kinds of bounce. In a hundred parallel universes fully seventy of them don’t result in a sniff.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 7:59 PM PST up reply actions  

So what? It did happen. In nine parrallel universes Lundmark doesn’t fucking suck and we’re winning too. It still, at the very least is a high percentage get the puck out with no chance of icing play…flipping it high in the air. It’s a damn smart play regardless and I’m getting a little tired of hearing how every mistake is Jokers fault. Lundmark licked bag that period and he’s the reason we’re down 2-1. Plain and simple.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 8:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Well no I just don’t characterize it as a good pass when odds-on it doesn’t work. Y’know?

Just cuz you hit a straight with 2-6 offsuit against Aces, doesn’t make it a good bet on the flop.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 8:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Well, then we disagree. I don’t know shit about poker, but I know that in hockey flipping the puck high out of the zone is never a bad play and whether it’s lucky or not, doesn’t matter much to me. I just want a struggling defensive line to make smart plays getting it out without icing it…if it results in a play that leads to a goal, all the better. Either way, it’s certainly not a bad play.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 8:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh come now, at least wait till the end of the game before being all Apocalyptic like that. giv them a chance to make those back and all that

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 7:51 PM PST up reply actions  

yeah but come on…they’ve given up goals in less than a minute in the Hawks, Kings, and Ducks game. that’s baffling…and i guarantee you that not even the Hurricanes give up shit like that.

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 7:53 PM PST up reply actions  

1:08 or so I thought they said but point taken. Like I said earlier though that happened a ton last year too. Mental thing I think.

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 7:59 PM PST up reply actions  

I’m not apocalyptic, they can win this game and it’s still well within reach but it won’t be on the back of the Iggy-Getzlaf matchup. That’s all.

I just want Jokinen off tough comp. Have wanted this since the start of the season.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 7:56 PM PST up reply actions  

It’s not going to happen tonight If Jokinen sticks with Iginla. Carlyle will go for that hard match all game.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 7:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah and the sad thing is that Iginla was actually hard to push off the puck in the OFF zone in this period. So I think you put him beside Langkow and that line can go even with the Getzlaf line.

Maybe.

I might be a hopeless optimist.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 8:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Corsi.

Flames +4. Guess which 5 Flames are in the red?

Actually, that’s no skill tester, is it?

EV shots 11-6 CGY.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 7:59 PM PST reply actions  

because he used to play for the Blackhawks

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 8:06 PM PST up reply actions  

lol. i had a feeling you’d like that one.

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 8:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Also…why the hell is Nystrom playing with Conroy and Glencross?

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:05 PM PST reply actions  

Sutter was saving Boyd up for a McG shift, apparently.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 8:07 PM PST up reply actions  

because moss is playing with lanks and dawes and because Sutter thought it’d be a good idea to play McGrattan over Sjostrom?

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 8:07 PM PST up reply actions  

I don’t know. I didn’t see Boyd bad or anything in the first. Perplexing.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 8:07 PM PST up reply actions  

The only guess I can hazard is that Sutter wants an actual center on the 4th line so it’s not a total disaster.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:07 PM PST up reply actions  

for a moment there it looked like the 1st line would redeem themselves.

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 8:09 PM PST reply actions  

Good shift at any rate. And Joker did a good job on the cover when they went the other way. Now lets see how the PP does.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 8:11 PM PST up reply actions  

haha, poor ANA. Everything they do is a penalty.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:10 PM PST reply actions  

I’m not feeling sympathetic right now…so that’s ok.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 8:11 PM PST up reply actions  

Kyle Calder will be seeing Lundmark in the AHL very soon I wager.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:11 PM PST reply actions  

That was a cheap play by gio

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 8:12 PM PST reply actions  

Cheap? he was just swinging at the puck as far as I could see. Stupid maybe.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:12 PM PST up reply actions  

I dunno about cheap, but careless sure…I dunno, likely under pressure we all do the same.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 8:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, just careless, when I saw it I thought he hit him deliberately replay changed my mind

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 8:14 PM PST up reply actions  

moron hockey

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 8:13 PM PST reply actions  

Now the disaster starts.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 8:14 PM PST reply actions  

The Flames have a lot of guys who can win puck batltes against guys at their pay grade and higher.

That Perry play has to be interference. Has to be.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 8:14 PM PST reply actions  

And it’s not. Unbelievable.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 8:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Perry gets away with that a lot. He’s good at it, it’s not always interference, but it often is and it’s rarely called.

by SarahM on Nov 23, 2009 8:15 PM PST up reply actions  

I don’t know how you can even play defense these days. He …and that’s not a penalty? Fuck this.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 8:15 PM PST reply actions  

Ridiculous. Sometimes it stuns me how incompetent the reffing is in this league.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:16 PM PST up reply actions  

You guys must not watch the NBA much. Plenty of great players get away with stuff, on the basis that it’s “their move” Patrick Ewing traveled in the post every damn game for 15 years. Well, that’s Corey Perry’s move, just like it’s Holmstrom’s. He gets that call.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 8:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah…but if Glencross has a skate blade in the crease when a goal is scored…that’s interference.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Damn, Glenx could be at the point and get goalie interference

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 8:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Correct. If Joe Schmuck on the Indiana Pacers shuffles a foot an inch, it’s a travel. Same deal, unfortunately.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 8:22 PM PST up reply actions  

When will they build perfectly objective officiating robots!?

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Man that Perry character is assholish. He’s got that CSI criminal look.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 8:16 PM PST reply actions  

That said, he’s dangerous almost every time he’s on the ice.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Is that good or lucky decision by Kipper? Im leaning towards good.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 8:17 PM PST reply actions  

He’s freezing a lot of shots so that’s what’s important. No rebounds.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 8:18 PM PST up reply actions  

good when the team pays attention and gets the damn puck out of the zone

by d_p_h on Nov 23, 2009 8:18 PM PST up reply actions  

looked good to me, saw it coming.

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 8:18 PM PST up reply actions  

That was a little risky by Kipper… but it worked.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 8:17 PM PST reply actions  

I think this is one of the best games I’ve seen Jokinen play, at least defensively…
you can debate if he should be playing defensively focused… but maybe he’s decided do some good work on the D-side will lead to some good work on the O-side

by d_p_h on Nov 23, 2009 8:18 PM PST reply actions  

yeah, I dont think he’s been bad or anything. I just think the line is overmatched. They’re facing three of the best forwards in the west.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:18 PM PST up reply actions  

That was a decent sequence by Jokinen and the Flames got a good zone shift out of it.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:21 PM PST reply actions  

Iggy saw lots of kipper skate in his grille on that one…

by d_p_h on Nov 23, 2009 8:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Shouldn’t Phaneaf have taken away both those passes?

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 8:23 PM PST reply actions  

As is their custom, Flames aren’t doing anything in the 2nd period.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:23 PM PST reply actions  

The only really good one I can remember off the top of my head was against Montreal at home the first week of the season. The fact that it stands out is not good, is it?

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 8:24 PM PST up reply actions  

farkin’ penalties..

by d_p_h on Nov 23, 2009 8:23 PM PST reply actions  

Nasty looking hit – was that a stick trip? I thought it looked more like boarding. But they called it tripping clearly.

Idiots. Even when they get it right, they get it wrong.

(unless I’m wrong)

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 8:24 PM PST reply actions  

Never mind, I’m wrong. It happens.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 8:25 PM PST up reply actions  

I think the stick was sort of wedged against the skate.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:25 PM PST up reply actions  

We really cannot afford to lose this game so they better get their heads in it. The month doesn`t end very friendly for us, so what should be an easy two points better get a little more attainable IMO

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 8:25 PM PST reply actions  

Boy they are fraidy cats on the PK. This is the most collapsed box I’ve seen all season.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 8:26 PM PST reply actions  

Well Jokinen made a nice play there in the D-zone.

I still don’t think he plays well against tough comp. But credit is due.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 8:29 PM PST reply actions  

Right now, I’ll take progress and showing signs of improvement…

by d_p_h on Nov 23, 2009 8:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Pardy is showing some offensive progress I didn`t see last year.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 8:29 PM PST reply actions  

Agreed he’s made some good choices this year in that regard

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 8:31 PM PST up reply actions  

i also agree that pardy looks pretty effin’ solid, but i wonder how much of that is due to gio’s consistant positional abilities

by walkinvisible on Nov 23, 2009 11:03 PM PST up reply actions  

I thought that was Pardy’s best game last night. Yes, Gio probably deserves some credit.

by maimster on Nov 24, 2009 7:30 AM PST up reply actions  

Fire that!!!!!! agghhh

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 8:31 PM PST reply actions  

What a chance by Jay Bou,,,

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 8:32 PM PST reply actions  

Lanks is having a pretty good game tonight… just a couple inches a couple times and he has a couple goals, he’s making some great D plays as well

by d_p_h on Nov 23, 2009 8:32 PM PST reply actions  

Damn these Ducks are getting away with murder. Trip on Glencross on the last PK, and a surefire hold on Iginla by Nieds, and Peter Loubardias mentioned Sarich’s stick was held (though I didn’t see).

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 8:32 PM PST reply actions  

Well, they got some chincy ones called against them in the first, so now we have to even things up.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:33 PM PST up reply actions  

It just looked to me like he was doing the backstroke in the corner, waving his arms everywhere. I guess that was it.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 8:33 PM PST up reply actions  

the trip on glenX was blatant coming up the boards out of the zone. the sarich stick holding was behind the play but UNBELIEVABLY obvious: sarich was literally YANKING on his stick and could not get it away from the ducks player….

by walkinvisible on Nov 23, 2009 11:04 PM PST up reply actions  

(behind the net, though, and behind the play on the sarich penalty)

by walkinvisible on Nov 23, 2009 11:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Does Sutter know you don`t have to keep the same lines on the PP… Lundmark? Why not Boyd?…or many others.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 8:36 PM PST reply actions  

Sigh…

Is it to early to say that last years scapegoat on the PP (Keenan/Preston) might not have been to blame?

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 8:37 PM PST reply actions  

Nice shot by Gio at least (I guess). Why do the Flames look bored on the PP?

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:37 PM PST reply actions  

I never thought I would say this once iron mike left, but why can’t we decline penalties like football.

by d_p_h on Nov 23, 2009 8:38 PM PST reply actions  

but what do we get instead? five yards closer?

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 8:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Considering they were 34% or so on faceoffs last night, they may need to decline those to. Maybe just dump the puck in the corner like pickup hockey or the warmup!

by maimster on Nov 24, 2009 7:33 AM PST up reply actions  

Thankyou….Boyd out there on the first line. Man, ask and you shall receive.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 8:39 PM PST reply actions  

Meh, I don’t consider him an improvement. Get Moss or someone willing to take up shop in front of the net out there.

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 8:41 PM PST up reply actions  

He’s an improvement over Lundmark. I don’t think there’s a debate there.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:42 PM PST up reply actions  

If he scores a PP goal or contributes (assist or not) to one then I’ll say he’s an improvement. Until then I stand by my statement.

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 8:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Nine forwards for the third, I’d guess, maybe 10 if they spot Nystrom. Not much of Lundmark or McG., if I had my way.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 8:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Shows how badly the flames need a really good forward.

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 8:42 PM PST up reply actions  

They have all year, and Bourque being on the shelf just exacerbates the situation.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 8:43 PM PST up reply actions  

CRAAAAZY nice dodge by gio…. not only does he not take an elbow in the head but he actually takes bobby ryan out of the play.

by walkinvisible on Nov 23, 2009 11:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Iginla looked possessed on that shift, and vs. Getzlaf and co. too. Nice.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 8:40 PM PST reply actions  

Let’s hope he stays that way for the third.

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 8:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Flames outchanced 8-3 in that period thanks to all the Ducks PP’s.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:41 PM PST reply actions  

Ahh the Flames. We have an uncanny ability to make good goalies look shitty, and struggling goalies look great.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 8:44 PM PST reply actions  

These guys are idiots….yeah pound Perry cause the refs are blind and be down 5 on 3 for a century.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 8:46 PM PST reply actions  

Listening to between periods on SNET is bad for your brain.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:48 PM PST up reply actions  

I think so, at least Maclean was saying that Perry should have been penalized. I think blatent contact should be a suspendable offense after the fact. What if Kipper gets sliced open like Ward? (I know that wasn’t the same and wasn’t Nash’s fault) but the same injury could happen.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 8:51 PM PST up reply actions  

i honestly can’t watch john shannon.

by walkinvisible on Nov 23, 2009 11:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Corsi.

Flames +1, +5 overall. Boyd is +10. Just sayin’

EV shots 7-6 CGY, 18-12 overall.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 8:46 PM PST reply actions  

Great number for Boyd. He keeps trucking along.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:47 PM PST up reply actions  

It would be nice if that turned into a goal, because he, and the team, could use a boost when Bourque is out.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 8:48 PM PST up reply actions  

So keep him on the first line…he needs those points are was being unfairly hard on him earlier today for.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 8:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Looks like that last shift got Iginla and Jokinen out of the red as well. Plus they had a couple shifts against not-Getzlaf in that period.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:49 PM PST up reply actions  

They dug themselves out towards the end. The Flames were actually -1 with about 7 minutes left in the period.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 8:51 PM PST up reply actions  

He’s earned it somewhat with Nystrom on those 4 on 4 shifts. That said, I don’t know if I’ve seen him start much in the D-zone. A lot of Lanks and Iggy on those move-the-puck-north gigs to my eye.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 8:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah…mostly because he drew the McGrattan assignment. No way is Sutter starting that dude in the bad end of the ice.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:50 PM PST up reply actions  

There was a panic shift where I saw Prust get pinned in the D-zone, and I thought I heard Loub say McGrattan’s name as well. But I couldn’t spot 10 anywhere. Somehow I doubt it happened. But it could have.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 8:53 PM PST up reply actions  

These idiots are lucky not to be down by three or four though. This could have been Chicago-esque on the score clock with the way the Ducks PP is going.

And we’re not playing nearly half as well tonight at EV as we did on Thursday.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 8:49 PM PST reply actions  

And we’re not playing nearly half as well tonight at EV as we did on Thursday.

Considering the quality of the opposition, likely so.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 8:53 PM PST up reply actions  

comments so far match what i’m seeing. bright side is our net is winning the shot battle 30-14, so that could be good news for the third.

by maimster on Nov 23, 2009 8:49 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Getzlaf is just murdering us tonight.

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 8:50 PM PST reply actions  

So Leland Irving’s sv% is heading the wrong way….to .916% and dammit Brent Krahn is at 10-2 1.41 .958. Jeeezus.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 8:58 PM PST reply actions  

Abbotsford can’t kill a penalty for bugger-all, Lawrence. I’m not sure it’s on him.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 8:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh, for sure… it’s more that Krahn couldn’t save a puck for years until we trade him. Maybe the team is dominant.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 9:00 PM PST up reply actions  

uhhhh…. i’m pretty sure we just let him walk. ;)

by walkinvisible on Nov 23, 2009 11:09 PM PST up reply actions  

and it doesn’t help that the Farm is the most penalized team in the AHL.

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 9:01 PM PST up reply actions  

It’s amazing how unfortable Jokinen looks with the puck on his stick (when the option facing him isn’t SHOOOOT).

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 8:58 PM PST reply actions  

This period is looking better

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 9:03 PM PST reply actions  

Gio nice shift by Gio!

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 9:03 PM PST reply actions  

Yeah.

no need for phaneuf as gio gets better and better.

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:03 PM PST up reply actions  

don’t know about that. sometimes it looks like gio needs to hit the weightroom.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 9:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, but when you stand next to guys like Phaneaf, Bouwmeester, and Regehr all day who wouldn’t?

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 9:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, that’s for sure. Don’t forget Pardy. I dunno why the website has him listed at 6’2" he is very obviously taller than that.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 9:08 PM PST up reply actions  

I’m just saying Gio can play the power play well, so we can trade Phaneuf for that much needed forward.

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Stilol remember that game where he couldn’t handle Byfuglien I see.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 9:08 PM PST up reply actions  

There’s been a few, but I keep quite about it because of all his other assets…there is the screening Kipper issue too, but I’m seeing that less and less.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 9:11 PM PST up reply actions  

plus I think the extra 5 million bucks puts more weight in Phaneuf’s pockets

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 9:12 PM PST up reply actions  

i just logged in to suggest (and i’m sure it’s been suggested by others already tonight) that gio is ON FIRE. unbelievable game…. i presume he’ll play pretty much until we get a goal or the game ends, whichever comes first….

by walkinvisible on Nov 23, 2009 9:05 PM PST reply actions  

Dion’s looked… uninterested today.

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 9:08 PM PST up reply actions  

gio looks better than dion most nights. dion looks disinterested most nights.

by walkinvisible on Nov 23, 2009 11:11 PM PST up reply actions  

Good shifts all around

Flames are moving around well. Really winning the battles for possession.

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:06 PM PST reply actions  

Unbelievable rush by Boyd there.
I’m still nervous about his ability to play the tough minutes, but it starts tonight.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 9:07 PM PST reply actions  

Yeah, they look like the far better team this period.

Good see Boyd getting another chance on the Jokinen-Iginla line. I thought he acquitted himself well, failed centering pass notwithstanding.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 9:07 PM PST reply actions  

You know, its the same thing every game. I get my hopes up that they will score and make the game competitive but it never happens. Unlike us, our opponents never give up their lead.

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 9:10 PM PST reply actions  

Is that true? We never win from behind? What about last game?

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:11 PM PST up reply actions  

Or the several games this year where the flames tied it in the last minute and went on to win it.

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 9:12 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

True.

But those are few and far between.

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 9:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Maybe JS is just amazing. But GlenX damn!

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:13 PM PST reply actions  

he’s not amazing. he isn’t. the Flames have a way of pumping shots into goalies.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 9:14 PM PST up reply actions  

I was being a little facetious.

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:15 PM PST up reply actions  

But why can’t we score?

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Now we know why Glencross leads the team in chance differential. He’s been great tonight.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 9:14 PM PST reply actions  

He scored the only goal of the game for Calgary.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 9:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, I just saw the highlight… He’s a monster tonight.

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Btw, any word on what exactly is wrong with Bourque. Is he playing next game?

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 9:16 PM PST reply actions  

that totally freaked me out until I remembered it’s nov 23rd.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 9:19 PM PST up reply actions  

lol. well Yahoo! hasnt even updated his status. no injury note.

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 9:23 PM PST up reply actions  

What are the shots in this period like?

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:18 PM PST reply actions  

Maybe Joker could of passed there instead of that spin and fling. Come on!

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 9:19 PM PST reply actions  

Perry is a piece of shit.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 9:19 PM PST reply actions  

They’re all a bunch of pugnacious Brian Burke punks.

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 9:21 PM PST up reply actions  

After crushing Kipper all night, Kipper should of just that bitch with his stick.

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 9:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Wow, that’s bull.

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 9:19 PM PST reply actions  

I think we should start running into their goalie too.

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:20 PM PST reply actions  

Wow….hosed on calls all night (except the first period).

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 9:21 PM PST reply actions  

It’s been a good chase period by the Flames, but they aren’t getting any bounces.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 9:26 PM PST reply actions  

Awful pass by Dawes on that one sequence though.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 9:26 PM PST reply actions  

40 to 28!

Damn… we do make js look good.

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:27 PM PST reply actions  

Highest shot output of the year by the Flames.

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 9:27 PM PST up reply actions  

We dont’ got the luck tonight.

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah its too bad. As Kent just pointed out, no bounces for us.

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 9:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Come on Lanks… late game heroics.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 9:28 PM PST reply actions  

is it to much to ask for a clean win to the point, and a tip in front?

by Jeshko on Nov 23, 2009 9:29 PM PST reply actions  

i’ll take that in substituion :)

by Jeshko on Nov 23, 2009 9:30 PM PST up reply actions  

HOLY SHIT!!!!!

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 9:29 PM PST reply actions  

ggeezus

what a time to step up Iggy and Joker

by d_p_h on Nov 23, 2009 9:30 PM PST reply actions  

that was a hell of a pass if he meant to put it off the skate

by d_p_h on Nov 23, 2009 9:30 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

THE CARDIAC FLAMES

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 9:31 PM PST reply actions  

Honestly. I’m not complaining, but is it too much to ask for to score that last goal two minutes earlier?

by SarahM on Nov 23, 2009 9:32 PM PST up reply actions  

haha nice. Good play by Jokinen on that rush. Nice bounce on the shot too.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 9:31 PM PST reply actions  

Seriously, I think this has been Joker’s best game…in my eyes. he’s getter better…just at glacial speed.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 9:32 PM PST reply actions  

Joker is having a solid game.

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 9:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Well, it’s nothing less than they deserve, really. EV shots were 18-7 in the third.

As for Joker-Iggy, after about the middle of the second, they’ve been good.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 9:34 PM PST reply actions  

The Ducks can’t see the Blue line.

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:34 PM PST reply actions  

Or the several games this year where the flames tied it in the last minute and went on to win it.
by Parallex on Nov 24, 2009 12:12 AM EST

…what can I say, I was wrong.

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 9:35 PM PST reply actions  

That was an awful shift by Regehr

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 9:36 PM PST reply actions  

Yeah, why was he circling… GlenX alone in front again?!

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Jesus, that was like a two minute shift by that line.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 9:39 PM PST reply actions  

nice poke check by kipper

by Jeshko on Nov 23, 2009 9:39 PM PST reply actions  

so any bets glencross gets to shoot?

by Jeshko on Nov 23, 2009 9:40 PM PST reply actions  

So you think GlenX will get a chance at the shootout?

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 9:40 PM PST reply actions  

You mean in the initial three? Doubt it.

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 9:41 PM PST up reply actions  

I hate shootouts.

Why don’t they make it 2 on 1 drills.

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:40 PM PST reply actions  

Man three star selection is gonna be tough tonight.

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 9:40 PM PST reply actions  

Losing goalie third, game winning “goal” second, winning goalie first.

Giguere’s oversized pads have been phenomenal tonight.

by Resolute on Nov 23, 2009 9:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Pretty much we’ve just been shooting it into the pads.

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Like I said, his pads were phenomenal. ;)

by Resolute on Nov 23, 2009 9:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Shoot-out. That shift by Joker-Iggy-Phaneuf-Gio was as good as you can do without a goal.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 9:40 PM PST reply actions  

Well, then Gio was caught flatfooted in the neutral zone.

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:41 PM PST up reply actions  

You just gotta deke Giguere and put it up… goal every time.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 9:40 PM PST reply actions  

Well, aside from a terrible first, I was pretty happy with the Iginla/Jokinen duo tonight. That might be the first time I’ve said that this year.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 9:41 PM PST reply actions  

yeah they did a good job

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 9:42 PM PST up reply actions  

I think Jokinen had a stronger game than Iggy did..

by d_p_h on Nov 23, 2009 9:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Wow! That would be a first.

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Jokinen had a really good 3rd I thought.

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 9:43 PM PST up reply actions  

It should be Dawes, …umm…. dawes…… I dunno….guys who can deke.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 9:42 PM PST reply actions  

It doesn’t matter. we went from 0 points to 1 point. Shootouts are stupid anyway.

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Reverse psychology. I like it!

by Resolute on Nov 23, 2009 9:43 PM PST up reply actions  

yeah…it’s gonna be tough.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 9:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Perry is just going to jump on Kipper.

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 9:43 PM PST reply actions  

Gio… get Gio to shoot.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 9:43 PM PST reply actions  

Wait!

he lost possession. Doesn’t that mean he doesn’t get an opp!?

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:44 PM PST reply actions  

no puck was still moving forward

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 9:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Five hole, why do they go for JS’s five hole?

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:44 PM PST reply actions  

FUCK….don’t shoot low. dammit

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 9:44 PM PST reply actions  

nice pokecheck!

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 9:44 PM PST reply actions  

why aren’t they shooting up high?

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:45 PM PST reply actions  

That’s the elder Finn schooling the younger Finn.

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 9:46 PM PST reply actions  

that shouldn’t be allowed. he stopped.

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:46 PM PST reply actions  

Ah, Teemu. I can never hate you, you bastard.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 9:46 PM PST reply actions  

If anyone is going to beat us, I accept that it be Selanne.

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 9:47 PM PST up reply actions  

I’m a Jets fan from the dark ages, KJ. Just how it is. I was in the building the night he broke Bossy’s rookie record.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 9:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Ducks did not deserve that win, I thought. Their goalie won it for them.

That being said, why the hell is Dawes shooting before Iginla?

by Resolute on Nov 23, 2009 9:46 PM PST reply actions  

Iggy sucks on the SO

by tsukemonoki on Nov 23, 2009 9:47 PM PST up reply actions  

He wasn’t terrible last year.

by Resolute on Nov 23, 2009 9:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Ah well, we got a charity point at least.

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 9:47 PM PST reply actions  

Actually, they did. That was a tie game.

by Resolute on Nov 23, 2009 9:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Meh, we “lost” the game but still got a point so I call it a charity point. I’d rather go back to having tie games to be honest but that’s not how the powers that be want it done these days.

by Parallex on Nov 23, 2009 9:51 PM PST up reply actions  

If we lost in overtime, I’d agree. But since Anaheim did not win a hockey game last night, they were the ones receiving a charity point for succeeding in a gimmick that has absolutely nothing to do with hockey.

by Resolute on Nov 24, 2009 7:06 AM PST up reply actions  

At least they competed and got a point out of this one. Goodnight fellas.

Spreading that Calgary Flames, Montreal Expos, The U, and Orlando Magic love.

by KingJafi on Nov 23, 2009 9:48 PM PST reply actions  

Well, i was relatively pleased with that effort. The first had the trademark 2 minutes hate and the second was littered with penalties, but it was solid otherwise.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 9:48 PM PST reply actions  

Man, that freaking sucked. Why didn’t they deke on Giguere? Do they have no scouts? Even I know you don’t shoot on the guy. ARGHHH. I say….don’t shoot, what do all three do? Shoot.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 9:50 PM PST reply actions  

That’s when you wish you still had Huselius in the line-up.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 9:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah no kidding. JS has been in the league long enough that they should know this by now. On penalty shots his angles are impecable. You gotta get him moving, and you’ll almost never beat him low.

by LawrenceS on Nov 23, 2009 9:52 PM PST up reply actions  

Entertaining game, anyway. I didn’t think we played too well, we won the depth battle but our top guys were destroyed in the first thirty or so minutes. I think the ice was pretty evenly tilted through two at EV, but that’s not exactly a victory.

You wonder what happens if the Ducks PP even clicks with one goal. Surely they deserved it, they were dangerous on the man advantage allnnight and the Flames PK couldn’t handle them at all.

Full credit for the comeback though, and Iginla looked possessed in the latter half of the game. And Jokinen made me a liar, for the last half of this game at least – although you watch, he will stink at PVP again.

But the Ducks got shortchanged only being up 2-1 going in the third, and I have no qualms admitting that.

And I hate to be the lone contrarain voice. But that’s how I saw it.

P.S. the reffing was pretty even in the third I thought. The Ducks got away with a ton of obstruction, but so did the Flames D on the odd Ducks chance.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 9:56 PM PST reply actions  

Didn’t really look like that at the game. Ducks fans around us were generally thanking their lucky stars that they got a point, and I’d tend to agree.

by maimster on Nov 24, 2009 7:52 AM PST up reply actions  

That said, I think the Flames looked ok in OT, which is where you might see some pushback from the Ducks. It looked to me like they outchanced the Ducks there, but I’ll wait for Kent’s count for that.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 9:57 PM PST reply actions  

The Ducks did not deserve to win this game a gift from Jamie Lundmark won them this game. We dominated and they deserved the whole two points.

Why does Giggy have to wake up against us.

Not happy with the result but their are a lot of good things that can be taken from this game.

30 years of the NHL's Best Hockey, It got us through some tough times.

by CofRed on Nov 23, 2009 10:00 PM PST reply actions  

Jamie Lundmark is a player on this roster. Thus, his mistakes cannot be separated from our team’s mistakes. And his mistake completely reflects his calibre as a player, and the disparity between that skill level and that of our opposition.

If anything, one would look at Kent’s chance count and be glad he didn’t cost us more goals.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 10:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Scoring chances are up. I think the results will surprise people…because they actually surprise me.

Iginla and Jokinen still underwater. Glencross +7!

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 10:00 PM PST reply actions  

And Lundmark shows he really is an AHLer…-5 in this game.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 10:00 PM PST up reply actions  

5-5 at EV in the third is surprising as hell. Must have been the transition chances. It happens. But the first two periods are exactly in line imo.

I would have expected Iggy underwater, that first three or four Getslav vs. Iggy shifts were excrucatingly bad to watch. I mean, you expect a bit more from your leaders right? And that’s just the hockey fan in me speaking. The cold hearted bastard is even worse.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 10:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Must have been the transition chances.

Pretty much. The Ducks had two real stints in the zone and they resulted in shots and rebounds, which are scoring chance gold. The Flames spent way more time in the good end, but there was a lot of point shots, blocks and shots from the side.

Glencross is a freaking beast by this metric.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 10:06 PM PST up reply actions  

If you want to grant that Joker is a “good” player, having Lundmark out there is still three on two, R O. That’s a problem until the Flames reconfigure the lines. Bourque being out just adds to the problem.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 10:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Fair enough, and it was a good adjustment to put Boyd there in retrospect.

You still know my feelings on Jokinen. And the gamble paid off tonight (keeping him on Iggy’s line after the 30 minute mark) but we know it’s not going to last.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 10:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Sure. I don’t like him PvP at all, and haven’t. He has no history in his entire career that would suggest he’s capable of it. I can understand why it happens, but I don’t have to like it.

by Robert Cleave on Nov 23, 2009 10:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Well…it paid off with a tie, gained in the last minute of the game.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 10:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Ok I just checked out the +7 you were talking about. You ddin’t say it was 7-0!!!!

Damn. THAT is how you play in the NHL.

by R O on Nov 23, 2009 10:07 PM PST up reply actions  

I ahd a feeling it would be a big number as I counted the game, but I didn’t think it would be that lop-sided. He was outstanding this evening.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 23, 2009 10:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Surprised me – I was in the Flame offensive end and I thought there were way more than 5 scoring chances. Could be getting caught up in the crowd emotion.

Seriously, other than the first 5 minutes, a couple of random PvP shifts and the PP in the second, it never felt like Anaheim was in this game, and that crowd, which is usually very rowdy, was extremely subdued the entire game. I never noticed anyone for Anaheim except the first line (and Carter taking dumb penalties). Don’t think the numbers do this one justice (with the exception of GlenX, who was worth every penny).

by maimster on Nov 24, 2009 8:00 AM PST up reply actions  

The chance count would have been a totally different story if the Flames didn’t spend half the second period on the PK I think. Part of that was them and part of that was the officials going out of their way to “even up” the call tally after the Flames enjoyed a couple more PP’s in the first.

by Kent Wilson on Nov 24, 2009 9:01 AM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Calgary Flames.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Funny-pictures-chippy-the-attack-gopher-1hv_small
20 wins required
Necks_small
Dave Shoalts says ridiculous stuff about goaltending
Needles_small
New Team, for me anyway...
Necks_small
Are the Flames the team where Shooting Percentage comes to die?
Lax-xl_small
Flames and Roughnecks
Funny-pictures-chippy-the-attack-gopher-1hv_small
Defensive imbalance

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 51 31 15 5 67
Minnesota 51 25 19 7 57
Calgary 52 24 22 6 54
Colorado 53 26 25 2 54
Edmonton 51 20 26 5 45

(updated 2.4.2012 at 12:36 AM PST)

24 - 22 - 6

Won 1


Certified Executives of the Office of Management

52987_1302804284_tb_small ArikJames

Photo_71_small Hayley

Officiants of the Bureau of Editing

Ryan_small SO_RyanP

Dsc03339_small Mitch Smith

Bureaucrats

E571c235251f6540d35494b73d613163_small Justin Azevedo

Luongo_small DownGoesLuongo

Redfordnewmanbutchcassidy19_small Scott Lepp

Mcinnismonday_small BookoflooB