Flames Game Day: Era of Good Feeling
"Usually our line plays against the other team's top lines, or the No.-1 set of defencemen, so it's not anything extra," Bourque said.
That's also from the Sun story I linked. That matches my observation as well, and suggests that the coaching staff has seen what most of us have. That is, the Langkow-Bourque-Dawes line is the best on the team, and will get the P v P match-ups to go with it. The QComp numbers have tightened up since the early part of the year, which makes me wonder if we won't see a redux of 07/08, where a non-Iginla line took on the heavies. The flaw that season was a poor bottom part of the roster, which isn't really much of an issue anymore, so this may not be the worst thing.
The men on the blue have stabilized, with Lindy Ruff taking notice. If the forwards are merely decent in their own end, the defence should be good enough to keep the Flames in a fairly lofty spot. The Phaneuf-Regehr paring has been very good in particular, with the discomfort of past attempts to match them seemingly shed. They're still seeing second level comp most nights, but the QComp numbers on D are tightening as well, so the point where the Flames throw two pairs at the the other team's best without a lot of manipulation might be near. That's a hell of luxury for any team to have. The Flames are obviously paying full price for it, but that's still a very nice thing to have in your pocket.
Kipper's been good. McE might get a spin in T. O., but with two days off before and after this B2B, I could see the temptation to give Kiprusoff both starts being quite strong.
The Sabres survived a pretty inspired effort by the Edmonton Falcons on Wednesday, winning 3-1 despite being out-shot 29-26. They also fought off a long PP at the end of the game resulting from Clarke MacArthur's boarding penalty. Note to Curtis Glencross: to avoid suspension, run a guy from behind, show some contrition, and hope he gets up fairly promptly. And hope he isn't Chris Drury.
The Buffaslugs have had a good start, with quality work from Ryan Miller between the pipes and a general out-shooting performance at the heart of it all. The Sabres are breaking in the highly touted Tyler Myers on the blueline, but it's Butler and Rivet that have handled the heavy going thus far, with Pominville and MacArthur doing the same up front. The team as a whole is pretty quick, so I'd expect them to test the Flames on the counter.
In terms of expectations, this should be a good game to see if the improved play on Tuesday is a one-off. Buffalo is a solid group, with the sort of speed that gives most teams some trouble. They're very well coached, IMO, and I wouldn't expect them Flames to get many easy goals on Miller, so any sort of good result tonight will have to be on the merits. The Sabre special teams have been middling thus far, so that extra PP work might have been wise. Hopefully, Brent Sutter still feels like he can rest easy after the game as well.
Game time is 5:30 MT, with coverage on Sportsnet West.
0 recs |
11 comments
|
Comments
The Iggy goal in MTL may have looked especially like a top line shift because it was Bourque out there with Iggy and Joker rather than Sjostrom – not as a matter of design, I don’t think, just timing of a line change.
As for the D, you captured well what I was trying to say in the answer to Kent’s survey a few days ago – they are expensive, but appear to have reached the point where either of the top 2 pairs goes out against the heavies, and that’s a great luxury to have.
The Iggy goal in MTL may have looked especially like a top line shift because it was Bourque out there with Iggy and Joker rather than Sjostrom – not as a matter of design, I don’t think, just timing of a line change.
That is correct.
As for the ‘D’, I think there’s some evidence so far that Sarich is having trouble carrying the load with Bouwmeester. We’ll see how that continues – Sarich can go through phases of being terrible – but at least we have other options if he continues to falter there.
Note to Curtis Glencross: to avoid susupension, run a guy from behind, show some contrition, and hope he gets up fairly promptly. And hope he isn’t Chris Drury.
agreed. i didn’t think either were dirty hits; macarthur had the unfortunate timing of lining up a hit before checking to see that reddox was still standing, and glenX had the unfortunate luck of hitting the guy with the softest head in a blue shirt…
also ? i can’t remember where i heard it (so it easily could have been right here) but we should probably get as much use as possible out of the term “buffaslug” this season, since the word on the street is that they’ll go back to the bison with cross sabres logo fulltime in 10/11.
I should have noted this previously, but Glencross’ hit was a Redden decision from being a really good play. I can understand why folks are mad about it – they should be, I think – but I’m fairly certain that Glencross was anticipating a pass up to Drury and the resulting hit would have made for an offensive zone turn-over. Instead, Redden looked-off Drury and passed it to someone else cross-ice. Glencross should have let up when that happened (and the hit was too high anyways), but I don’t think the intent was malevolent.
That’s pretty much my feeling about the play as well, because until just before the pass occured, I thought Redden was passing it to Drury, and the replays haven’t made me feel any different. As I said on Tuesday, I try to take off the red goggles when things like that happen, so a suspension from the result of that play was never going to upset me. I just feel like MacArthur got a unduly lenient result from his spin of the Wheel of Justice.
by Robert Cleave on Nov 13, 2009 1:37 PM PST up reply actions
hmmm… i don’t know. debateably high, yes. no more debateable than the phaneuf hit on okposo, IMO. and i also think that if drury popped back up immediately following, this would not be a discussion.
as for the reddox/macarthur hit, to me it looked like it might’ve been a clean hit had reddox not slipped on a banana peel and ended up halfway to the ice when macarthur made contact. also, the league is getting tough on headshots, and apparently that’s the only part of reddox that wasn’t injured.
by walkinvisible on Nov 13, 2009 2:20 PM PST up reply actions
A Sabre fan I may be, but I don’t see how anybody can think MacArthur’s hit deserved a suspension or fine. The game misconduct might have even been too harsh (unless it’s automatic after a major penalty? Not sure on that one).
He clearly didn’t intend to hurt Reddox, and when the contact happened, they were both fighting for the puck while racing toward the boards. I’m not even sure Mac was trying to hit him, and after he realized Reddox was hurt, he clearly felt bad about it and was checking to see if Red was OK.
The funniest part was Strudwick trying to jump MacArthur when Mac was trying to see if his teammate was hurt. What a buffoon.
by HarryNeale'sGarden on Nov 13, 2009 2:32 PM PST up reply actions
Thought I would share this link … a very “Beane-ish” philosophy on scouting and evaluating players – yet an interesting read nonetheless. Now if Doug could only figure out the “proprietary” formula of how to win in the playoffs lol … when it really matters.
http://www.forbes.com/2009/11/11/nhl-hockey-sharks-business-sports-hockey-values-09-wilson.html
by Calgarian in SJ on Nov 13, 2009 2:32 PM PST reply actions

by 





















